Is this the best way to report ANCOVA for a bachelor/honours thesis?
Hypothesis 1: Problem-focused news will elicit greater physiological arousal during exposure, as indicated by a higher task SCL after controlling for baseline SCL, than solution-focused news.
Baseline SCL was strongly positively correlated with task SCL, r(64) = .96, p < .001, justifying its inclusion as a covariate. Baseline SCL did not differ significantly between conditions, t(64) = -1.84, p = .071, confirming independence of the covariate from condition. Homogeneity of regression slopes was supported by a non-significant condition × baseline interaction, F(1, 62) = 1.50, p = .226. Residuals were normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk W = 0.98, p = .572) and variances were homogeneous (Levene's F = 0.18, p = .671).
An ANCOVA revealed no significant effect of condition on task SCL after covarying baseline SCL, F(1, 62) = 1.91, p = .172, η²p = .03. H1 was not supported.
Table 1
ANCOVA Results for Task SCL by Condition, Covarying Baseline SCL
| Source | SS | df | MS | F | p | η²p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Condition | 0.81 | 1 | 0.81 | 1.91 | .172 | .03 |
| Baseline SCL | 293.12 | 1 | 293.12 | 689.51 | <.001 | .92 |
| Condition × Baseline SCL | 0.64 | 1 | 0.64 | 1.50 | .226 | .02 |
| Residuals | 26.36 | 62 | 0.43 |
Note. SS = sum of squares; MS = mean square; η²p = partial eta squared. N = 66 (problem-focused: n = 33, solution-focused: n = 33).
Table 2
Unadjusted and Adjusted Means for Task SCL by Condition
| Condition | Unadjusted M | Adjusted M | SE | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Problem-focused | 2.43 | 2.95 | 0.12 | [2.71, 3.18] |
| Solution-focused | 3.52 | 3.05 | 0.12 | [2.82, 3.28] |
Note. Adjusted means control for baseline SCL. SCL = skin conductance level in μS.