u/Froggyjhon

Im confused on the reasoning behind the correct answer. If it says the researchers concluded that it applies to majority of companies how would we not eliminate C as an answer choice. "Several doctoral students in an underfunded psychology graduate program investigated social loafing in a company in San Francisco, California. The study included 51 women and 49 men. The researchers concluded that the study’s findings apply to the majority of companies in California. Which statement is accurate regarding the study?

• A. Since the researchers are doctoral students, their measure of social loafing is likely to be unreliable.
• B. Since the graduate program is underfunded, there is a conflict of interest for conducting the study.
• C. The findings cannot be generalized to most companies in California.
• D. The sample size is too small."