u/Fukes_161

Let us envision a unified nation in which everyone is assigned his place according to his socialistic rank, his talent for voluntary self-discipline based on inner conviction, his organizational abilities, his work potential, consciousness, and energy, his intelligent willingness to serve the common cause. Let us plan for general work conscription, resulting in occupational guilds that will administrate and at the same time be guided by an administrative council, and not by a parliament. A fitting name for this administrative body, in a state were everyone has a job, be it army officer, civil servant, farmer, or miner, might well be "labor council."

China reminds me of America before it was taken over by gay race communists.

That doesn't actually mean i fully endorse it, this is a very low bar that most of the world unfortunately doesn't live up to now. Despite this, it sounds like a pleasant place to live in free from liberalism and democracy.

Makes a commie piss their pants 😂😂 I have many problems with the bourgeoisie but if the leftoids wanna consider us bourgeois and capitalist that's fine for me, whatever gets these people out of civil society is fine with me

That's literally what it's called, what else am I supposed to call it, I'm not a nazbol, I don't support any socialism at all, in fact I see property as a cornerstone of a thriving society. It means the exact same as "Socialism" in "National Socialism", just because we call ourselves syndicalists doesn't mean we oppose capitalism for the same reasons you do or are red-brownists. Actually it was Fascists who appealed the most to Socialists not Nazis or Third Positionists. "Socialism" in the context of German conservatism means something very different than normal socialism, which is in fact opposed to it as it is individualistic and materialistic.

Actual National syndicalism supports private property rights and economic freedom it simply believes that it should be reconciled with the interests of the national community and shouldn't be based on vapid materialism. National Syndicalists ideal society is similar to Corporatism except that we are not class collaborationists, we believe in a free society of producers working according to their natural function. Its called third positionism for a reason as it's against both capitalism and socialism, and we don't oppose capitalism for the same reasons socialists do, neither do normal fascists or natsocs. I would much rather be considered a bourgeois pig than a communist to be honest with you, we don't want any reconcilation with communists and anarchosyndicalism and national syndicalism has always been historically opposed tendencies.

Here are several clear historical cases where explicitly nationalist/fascist syndicalist movements and revolutionary or left-wing syndicalist organizations directly clashed or pursued opposing goals.

---

Italy (1919–1926): Fascist syndicalists vs revolutionary labor unions

After World War I, Italy experienced the Biennio Rosso (“Two Red Years”), marked by factory occupations, strikes, and worker militancy led by socialist and syndicalist unions.

Left-wing syndicalist side

• Unione Sindacale Italiana (USI)
• Socialist labor organizations
• Factory councils in Turin associated with Antonio Gramsci

They pushed for:

• worker control of industry
• class struggle
• anti-capitalist revolution
• international labor solidarity

National syndicalist / fascist side

Former revolutionary syndicalists aligned with Benito Mussolini and helped build fascist corporatism:

• Fasci Italiani di Combattimento
• later fascist labor structures incorporated into the regime

They pushed for:

• class collaboration
• suppression of socialist unions
• national unity above class conflict
• corporatist state control

Concrete conflict

Fascist squads violently attacked:

• union halls
• strike committees
• socialist newspapers
• labor organizers

By the mid-1920s, independent syndicalist unions were destroyed or absorbed by the fascist state. This was not merely theoretical disagreement — it involved assassinations, street fighting, strikebreaking, and state repression.

---

Spain (1936–1939): Falangist national syndicalism vs anarcho-syndicalism

This is probably the clearest example.

Left-wing syndicalist side

• Confederación Nacional del Trabajo (CNT)
• Federación Anarquista Ibérica (FAI)

They advocated:

• worker self-management
• collectivization
• anti-state anarchism
• proletarian revolution

In parts of Republican Spain, they collectivized factories, farms, and transport systems during the Spanish Civil War.

National syndicalist side

• Falange Española
• later the unified Falangist state movement under Francisco Franco

Falangists used “national syndicalism” to mean:

• hierarchical national organization
• corporatism
• anti-Marxism
• authoritarian nationalism

Concrete conflict

The CNT militias literally fought Falangist and Francoist forces in:

• Barcelona
• Aragon
• Madrid fronts
• Andalusia

Franco’s victory led to:

• executions of CNT activists
• destruction of anarchist unions
• banning independent labor organization

This was direct military, political, and ideological conflict.

---

France (early 20th century): revolutionary syndicalists vs nationalist syndicalist currents

Left-wing syndicalist side

• Confédération générale du travail (CGT, revolutionary wing)

Advocated:

• general strike
• anti-capitalism
• worker emancipation

Nationalist side

Certain thinkers influenced by Georges Sorel drifted toward nationalist and proto-fascist politics, interacting with circles around:

• Action Française

Concrete opposition

The divide sharpened around:

• nationalism vs internationalism
• militarism vs anti-militarism
• support for authoritarian nationalism vs labor revolution

During and after WWI, revolutionary syndicalists increasingly viewed nationalist syndicalist tendencies as defections to reactionary politics.

The conflict here was more ideological and organizational than paramilitary, but still involved real splits in labor politics.

---

Portugal (1930s): Estado Novo vs anarcho-syndicalists

Left-wing syndicalist side

• Confederação Geral do Trabalho

National syndicalist / corporatist side

• Regime of António de Oliveira Salazar
• corporatist labor institutions inspired partly by fascist and national-syndicalist ideas

Concrete conflict

The Estado Novo regime:

• outlawed independent unions
• jailed syndicalists
• suppressed strikes
• imposed state-controlled corporative unions

Again, opposing interests were concrete:

• autonomous labor power vs state-managed labor hierarchy.

---

Broader pattern

Across Europe in the interwar period, the relationship was usually:

Revolutionary syndicalism	National syndicalism
Class struggle	National unity
Worker autonomy	State/corporate coordination
Internationalism	Nationalism
Anti-authoritarian or socialist	Authoritarian/corporatist
Independent unions	State-controlled labor bodies

In practice, national-syndicalist and fascist movements frequently:

• dissolved independent unions
• criminalized strikes
• imprisoned syndicalists
• replaced labor organizations with corporatist structures tied to the state.

That recurring pattern is why historians generally treat them as rival traditions despite the shared vocabulary around “syndicates” and labor organization.

Say NO to red-brownism, reds are our sworn enemies

Actual National Syndicalists are most similar to Mutualism in my opinion, Mutualists also understand that Reds are an enemy of true Socialism, which isn't leftwing at all

More based or more cringe?

I've been getting significantly more romanticist, anti-urban and anti-industrial since recently

Personally I think "traditionalism" is more accurate as well. It's enough said. I think the rotten right is BS, I have no interest in maintaining the bourgeoisie world or its values, I'm not interested in all of the bullshit reactionary conservative or nationalist movements, and since Western modernity has achieved global dominance, there's no point in "conserving anything". I have more faith in the Third Position instead which insists on the preservation of the Volk as a concrete social unit. In my opinion, they are the only true traditionalists, in both the lowercase and capital T senses. The rest are just deliberately working against themselves in one way or another.

Jose Antonio said: [The Third Position] was born to inspire a faith not of the Right (which at bottom aspires to conserve everything, even injustice) or of the Left (which at bottom aspires to destroy everything, even goodness), but a collective, integral, national faith.

I agree with him. Both the Right and Left only serve to conserve injustice at the end of the day. I think this applies to the so called "alternative right" as well although they are closer to third position (and thus better) than mainstream conservatives.

The whole aim of our governance should be summarized in these 5 words: ‘To erase 1789 from history.’ Only the Third Position can sufficiently fulfill such objectives, by insisting on the preservation of the nation as a spiritual unit, based on organic hierarchy and national traditions, and being consistently revolutionary and against the modern world in spite of the abnormal bigotry of reactionaries, communists and liberals.

Understructure o algo

she is a cute girl

Made it more in line with my usual persona

Romanticism + National Syndicalism + Monarchism

Nazi-Maoism + Northwest Territorial Imperative

Factions

• Third-Worldism
• Nazi Accelerationism
• Dengism
• Left-KKKommunism / Left Communism
• Nazi Syndicalism
• Social Fascism
• Maoism
• Pol Potism
• White Juche
• ANTIFA

^ All listed from accounts I found on twitter

I'm pretty sure this is a really old trend, but I did it for fun anyways

I drew her because I think the drawing is cute. This is different from my usual art style but I have been devolving for a while, I'm much more lazy now, lol.

I'm not convinced that any genuine stransserists exist, most of them are unserious in the first place, and the few that exist are probably nazbol white supremacists, which isn't at all strasserism, they were national socialists who were anti-bourgeoisie, not nazbols. In fact most of the stuff that make people mistake it for nazbol, you could say the same about normal natsoc, it's just that you can't lie as easily about it since it was an actual regime.

They were also not leftwingers they believed in a workplace hierarchy and feudalism.
The few stransserists i found are just transgender communists who hate black people. I doubt they're smart enough to research strasserism in the first place.

New page https://www.pcbaristocracy.com/User:Fuki

I didn't want to keep making trendposts, but I made another one because the comments are always kino