u/GreenInvestigator817

Image 1 — 90 days. I stopped chasing the “perfect program” and finally started making real progress.
Image 2 — 90 days. I stopped chasing the “perfect program” and finally started making real progress.
Image 3 — 90 days. I stopped chasing the “perfect program” and finally started making real progress.
Image 4 — 90 days. I stopped chasing the “perfect program” and finally started making real progress.
Image 5 — 90 days. I stopped chasing the “perfect program” and finally started making real progress.

90 days. I stopped chasing the “perfect program” and finally started making real progress.

Just wrapped up a 90-day block and honestly… the data taught me more than any fitness video ever did.
**Results:**
Bodyweight: **84 → 79 kg**
Squat: **+12.5 kg**
Deadlift: **+12.5 kg**
Bench: **+5 kg**
Weighted pull-ups: **+20 kg estimated 1RM**
44 sessions
\~386 tons of training volume
But the interesting part isn’t the PRs.
It’s *why* some lifts blew up while others barely moved.

**1. Progress isn’t linear. Consistency is.**
For 90 days:
\~4 sessions/week
no crazy motivation
no “beast mode”
no magic program
Just showing up over and over again.
Honestly, my activity graph looks boring.
And I think that’s the point.
Most people massively underestimate what happens when you stack decent sessions for months without constantly restarting.

**2. My deadlift improved when I stopped training like an idiot.**
Before:
too heavy too often
constant grinders
ego lifting
fatigue piling up
This block:
controlled RPE
cleaner reps
slower progression
enough volume to actually practice the movement
Result:
**152.5 ×4 → 165 ×4** without feeling destroyed every week.
Turns out strength responds really well to consistency and fatigue management.
Not just hype and ammonia.

**3. My bench “problem” wasn’t technical at all.**
I kept thinking:
weak triceps
bad leverages
poor recovery
bad bench genetics
Reality?
I was benching exhausted every single time.
Bench was always:
after squats
after deadlifts
second or third movement
never done fresh
Then I looked at the numbers:
Squat and deadlift: +12.5 kg
Bench: only +5 kg
The data made it painfully obvious.
So now bench goes first on at least one upper session every week.
Sometimes the solution isn’t more volume.
It’s just stopping yourself from sabotaging the lift.

**4. I got leaner AND stronger.**
And honestly this broke a belief I had for years:
“You can’t gain strength while cutting.”
You probably won’t optimize both perfectly.
But if:
the deficit is reasonable
sleep is decent
fatigue is managed
technique improves
…you can absolutely recomp.
I’m lighter than I was 3 months ago and stronger on almost every major lift.

**5. Tracking changed everything.**
The most useful thing wasn’t the program.
It was the data.
Because data exposes the lies your ego tells you.
Without tracking, I would’ve kept believing:
my bench had “bad genetics”
my deadlift needed more intensity
I needed a new program
When really, I mostly needed better exercise order and better fatigue management.

**Biggest lesson from these 90 days?**
Most people overestimate:
advanced programming
optimal exercises
intensity techniques
And underestimate:
consistency
recovery
exercise order
managing fatigue
accumulating quality reps over time
Progress is usually less dramatic than we want it to be.
It’s mostly just:
doing simple things well for a very long time.

PS : sorry yes i used ai to help put into form my thoughts and making it look good . Really proud to share my progress for the first time :) Happy to discuss on your thoughts and what was the biggest game changer for you guys :)

u/GreenInvestigator817 — 2 days ago
▲ 1 r/Garmin

[Prepping for a heavy squat block] This is how my Training Readiness and Sleep metrics look when I try to map them directly to my weightlifting RPE targets

I’ve been wearing a Garmin for years, and while it’s incredible for cardio and overall recovery tracking, I’ve always found it frustratingly disconnected from heavy strength training. Garmin’s data structure might tell me I’m "Recovered," but my central nervous system and legs are absolutely fried from a heavy deadlift session 48 hours ago.

Over the last few months, I’ve been trying to build a manual bridge between my morning Garmin metrics and my lifting program (an Upper/Lower/Push/Pull split) to auto-regulate my weights instead of just blindly following a spreadsheet.

Here is the rough framework I've been forcing myself to follow based on my data trends:

  • The Baseline: When my 7-day baseline recovery trend is completely stable and my sleep score is >75, I stick to the plan and auto-detect my +2.5kg progressions on top sets if I hit the rep ceiling.
  • The Yellow Alert: If my overnight recovery metrics drop 10-15% below my 28-day norm, or if I log high lifestyle stress, I cap my lifting RPE at 8. No maximal testing, even if the program dictates it.
  • The Red Alert (Like the screenshot attached): Tonight I slept under 6 hours, and my overnight recovery trend plummeted by 25% due to a brutal work week and having a couple of drinks on Wednesday. Garmin flagged my readiness low. On days like this, instead of forcing a 145kg barbell squat and risking injury, I force myself to swap the movement for a Smith machine or heavy machine accessories, capping the RPE strictly at 7.

To make my life easier, I actually ended up building a private web utility that hooks into my daily Garmin health data, normalizes my readiness and sleep horizons (daily vs 7-day trend vs 28-day baseline), and gives me a concrete recommendation on whether to push, deload, or swap exercises before I even step into the gym.

For the lifters here who track their data closely: How are you currently translating your Garmin readiness or baseline recovery scores into your lifting sessions? Do you manually drop your working weight when the watch flags high overnight stress, or do you just ignore it and lift anyway?

u/GreenInvestigator817 — 6 days ago