Login

u/Guilty-Divide3537

Image 1 — marseille (marslay?)- canon eos 50e 50mm 1,8, kodak gold 200
Image 2 — marseille (marslay?)- canon eos 50e 50mm 1,8, kodak gold 200
Image 3 — marseille (marslay?)- canon eos 50e 50mm 1,8, kodak gold 200
Image 4 — marseille (marslay?)- canon eos 50e 50mm 1,8, kodak gold 200
Image 5 — marseille (marslay?)- canon eos 50e 50mm 1,8, kodak gold 200
Image 6 — marseille (marslay?)- canon eos 50e 50mm 1,8, kodak gold 200
Image 7 — marseille (marslay?)- canon eos 50e 50mm 1,8, kodak gold 200
Image 8 — marseille (marslay?)- canon eos 50e 50mm 1,8, kodak gold 200
Image 9 — marseille (marslay?)- canon eos 50e 50mm 1,8, kodak gold 200
Image 10 — marseille (marslay?)- canon eos 50e 50mm 1,8, kodak gold 200
Image 11 — marseille (marslay?)- canon eos 50e 50mm 1,8, kodak gold 200
Image 12 — marseille (marslay?)- canon eos 50e 50mm 1,8, kodak gold 200
Image 13 — marseille (marslay?)- canon eos 50e 50mm 1,8, kodak gold 200
Image 14 — marseille (marslay?)- canon eos 50e 50mm 1,8, kodak gold 200
▲ 36 r/analog

marseille (marslay?)- canon eos 50e 50mm 1,8, kodak gold 200

some of these i actually concentrated (im v ammy) - 6 is my fave.

technical/general feedback v welcome - just realised its nice to not always shoot at f2.8 - on the landscape ones, are they blurry when zoomed in cos i didnt do a high enough f stop or cos thats just what it gonna look like? - i mean like none of it is really sharp when zoomed in?

sometimes composition is nice right? i suck technically but sometimes it look nice shapey

i also only got the scans back as jpgs and lightly edited them contrast saturation whatever. that a big no no? or only if ur thinkin about professional/doing prints from them? i only just found out u can edit photos LOL

u/Guilty-Divide3537 — 17 hours ago