u/Hammer_41

Are you a doomstacker?

9:28 AM

SS is going away. Healthcare will bankrupt you. Sequence of returns will wipe you out. Civil war. WW3. Live to 120, spend 40 years in a nursing home. Someone posts solid numbers and the comments come back , one more year. Two years. Three. Keep going, it's never quite enough.

At what point does conservative planning become catastrophe planning?

The 4% rule is the worst case in US market history. A robot pulling the same amount out every single year, no SS, no flexibility, never adjusting through 1929 when markets dropped 86%. That's what 4% survived. It's the floor, not the target. Bengen himself now says most retirees can safely start at 5.25% to 5.5% and that people clinging to 4% will likely end up with a pile of money and a lot of regrets.

Someone spending 6% of their portfolio in year one of retirement who skips the big trip when markets are down, holds off on the car, pulls back when things get rough that person likely does better than the 4% robot who never adjusts no matter what. The flexibility is the safety net. You don't need to engineer it into the number, you just need to act like a normal person.

So when someone holds out for 3.5% 28 times spend, no SS — what exactly are you protecting against? Something worse than the Great Depression, while also never collecting a benefit 70 million Americans receive, while also promising to never adjust spending under any circumstances. Does that actually describe you?

The 2025 Social Security Trustees Report says worst case — zero Congressional action you collect 81 cents on the dollar in 2034. Not zero. Congress fixed this in 1983 when it was in worse shape than it is today. Seventy million people collect it. Seniors vote.

Median age of death for men is 81.7. One in five reach 90. Dementia affects 33% of people 85 and older. The years you're working extra to fund may not be years you're fully there for.

For those already retired one year, five, ten or more how bad has it actually been? And for those still holding off are you a catastrophe planner waiting for a number that never feels safe enough?

reddit.com
u/Hammer_41 — 5 days ago

57M, $2.68M, $160k spend , close enough or keep going?

57M married empty nester Chicago suburbs. House paid off, no debt. Wife is 57, works part time as an RN.
Investable assets $2.68M. Paid off house , Mix of taxable brokerage 869k) Roth(250k) 126k cash,401k and IRA,. Equity heavy allocation.

Wife and I max out both 401ks, both do backdoor Roth, plus contribute to brokerage. Total contributions around $91k a year.

Spend is $160k net.
Modeling $3M as my number. Wife may work one more year. She likes the work and it keeps us on her employer health insurance.

Combined SS at 67 is around $70k/year.

Illinois exempts all retirement income from state tax. Federal only.

Three questions:
Anyone using guardrails in practice, does it actually change behavior in a down year or is it just a planning comfort?

Retired late 50s with an SS bridge, how did the pre-67 window feel in real life?

Anyone else in a similar situation, late 50s, spouse still working, closing in on their number? How are you thinking about it?

What would your number be to retire?

reddit.com
u/Hammer_41 — 7 days ago