Senior leaders what's the bigger AI governance gap - evaluating initiatives before you commit, or governing after you've deployed?
The AI governance conversation is happening in boardrooms right now and most senior leaders are being asked to own it without a framework to do so. I'm developing a half-day intensive for senior leaders on this topic. Before I finalize the content I want to hear from people actually in that seat.
Two things I'm genuinely trying to figure out:
- Is the bigger gap evaluating AI initiatives before committing resources, or governing AI after it's deployed?
- Which risk category keeps you up at night most: model/data risk, legal/regulatory exposure, reputational risk, or something else?
- What would make the 3 to 4 hours spent worthwhile for you: a framework, an artifact, a conversation, something else?
No links, no pitch. I'm just trying to build something worth building. What's your read?