u/Hklberry_JnglBells

I’ve been building a workforce management SaaS over the past few months, and honestly, it’s changed how I think about “features” vs “what people actually need.”

Here are a few things that surprised me:

1. People hate complexity more than missing features
I assumed more features = better product.
In reality, most people just want to get in, schedule their team, track hours, and leave.

Every extra button or setting just adds friction.

2. Payroll is way more confusing than it should be
This came up constantly.
Different pay types (hourly vs per shift), tracking time properly, calculating totals…

A lot of tools overcomplicate this or hide it behind layers of UI.

3. Simplicity is actually harder to build
It’s easy to keep adding features.
It’s hard to decide what NOT to include.

Trying to keep things clean and uncluttered forced me to rethink everything:

  • What’s essential?
  • What can be removed?
  • What can be combined?

4. “One size fits all” doesn’t really work
Different teams operate completely differently.

For example:

  • Restaurants split front-of-house / kitchen
  • Agencies split by client teams
  • Construction teams split by site

Trying to support this without making the UI messy is tricky.

5. Most tools feel like they were built for HR departments, not actual teams
A lot of products feel heavy and corporate.

But many teams just want:

  • Simple scheduling
  • Easy clock in/out
  • Clear pay tracking

That’s it.

I ended up building a simple tool around these ideas (mostly focused on keeping things clean and avoiding clutter), and it’s been interesting seeing how people respond to that vs more “feature-heavy” tools.

Curious—what’s the most annoying thing you’ve experienced with employee management or scheduling tools?

reddit.com
u/Hklberry_JnglBells — 19 days ago