u/Hopeful-Balance2891

Imagine you found some free Steam accounts that already have paid games on them. You showed them to your friends, and together you all started finding more accounts. Later, you wanted to play a game that was on one of those accounts with your friends, but another friend found that specific account first and was already using it. Everyone had agreed that all the accounts belonged to the group. To play, you only need to log in and start the game; the other person doesn't need to stay signed in. However, your friend doesn't want to let you use the account and says he doesn't care about the agreement. In that situation, what would be fair: letting you use the account because you originally shared the idea with everyone, or letting him keep using it because he found that particular account first?

Right now I am in an interna debate and I need external opinion.

Imagine you found free steam accounts with paid games. You shown to your friends and your friends and you start to found new accounts. Now you want to play with your friends a game that is on thoses accounts but another friend found it first and he is using it. Everyone agreed that the accounts is from everybody. You only need to login and to start the game only that you dont need to be sign in but your friend those not want to leed you do it and he says that he does not care. What would be correct to led you do that since you give the idea to everybody or led him play since he found the account. Please dont consider in your opinion that finding free steam accounts is unethical.