u/HowSway_

Spanish FA forced to reopen bidding for women’s football TV rights after no broadcaster meets asking price
▲ 766 r/FCBFemeni+1 crossposts

Spanish FA forced to reopen bidding for women’s football TV rights after no broadcaster meets asking price

No one bids for women’s football broadcasting rights

With no bidders willing to meet La Liga F’s minimum asking price of €5 million, a new one-week bidding period has been opened, this time with no minimum price.

La Liga F will have to hold a second round of bidding to sell its audiovisual rights. No one was willing to pay the minimum asking price set by the organization: €5 million for the eight matches per matchday, or €2 million for a single match broadcast free-to-air. There were also no offers for the international rights, which had been priced at €800,000.

Broadcasters will now have until August 19 to submit new offers, barely ten days before the competition is scheduled to begin on August 29. This time, there will be no minimum bid.

For the previous rights holder, DAZN, broadcasting women’s football turned out to be a financial disaster. It was paying €7 million per season before terminating the contract a year early. Now, despite the reduced asking price, no broadcaster is willing to take over for the current period. It looks bad.

This is a difficult and hard-to-understand situation for a competition that wants to present itself as professional. But there is an even more important question: how are the clubs supposed to prepare their budgets if they don't know how much television revenue they will receive?

Clubs have to plan salaries, transfers, coaching staff, travel, facilities and professional structures, all of which require financial certainty. Yet with barely two weeks to go before the season starts, they still don't know who will broadcast the competition or how much money they will receive from the audiovisual rights.

The clubs also bear some responsibility here, because they have repeatedly backed the management of the organization running the competition. If they support the management model, they must also accept their share of the responsibility when things don't work. This isn't simply a broadcasting problem; it's a problem of planning and management.

La Liga F had set reserve prices for its rights. The market has responded in the first round by saying it isn't willing to pay them. That doesn't mean women's football has no value. It means that the value La Liga F believes its product has does not currently match what broadcasters are willing to pay. And that's where a serious discussion should begin.

Especially considering that La Liga F's own organizational chart, published in its transparency section, currently lists the position responsible for competitions and audiovisual products as vacant. The question is inevitable: who is actually leading such a strategically important issue as the competition's audiovisual product?

It's not enough to simply put the rights on the market, set a price and wait for someone to accept it. You have to build an attractive product, analyze the market, understand the broadcasters and know what you can realistically demand and offer. If the first round failed, perhaps the question should be whether the €5 million and €2 million price points were realistic, whether the commercialization model is appropriate, or whether enough is being done to increase the competition's television value.

The second round will provide an answer. But it is coming late. Clubs need certainty to prepare their budgets, while fans need to know where they will be able to watch the competition. On August 19, we will find out whether anyone ultimately decides to bid for the rights.

abc.es
u/HowSway_ — 3 days ago
▲ 25 r/yimby

2026 v 2025 YTD US permits

By absolute units

State 2026 YTD 2025 YTD Difference
New York 22,446 15,045 7,401
California 56,709 51,168 5,541
Washington 20,815 16,709 4,106
Virginia 20,921 18,197 2,724
Alabama 10,947 8,822 2,125
North Carolina 49,574 47,483 2,091
Massachusetts 7,148 5,361 1,787
Kansas 6,995 5,306 1,689
Minnesota 10,968 9,361 1,607
South Carolina 25,793 24,757 1,036

By percentage

State 2026 YTD 2025 YTD Difference Percentage
District of Columbia 1,228 538 690 128%
Rhode Island 1,121 730 391 54%
New York 22,446 15,045 7,401 49%
New Hampshire 2,668 1,885 783 42%
Massachusetts 7,148 5,361 1,787 33%
Kansas 6,995 5,306 1,689 32%
Washington 20,815 16,709 4,106 25%
Alabama 10,947 8,822 2,125 24%
Montana 2,578 2,145 433 20%
Minnesota 10,968 9,361 1,607 17%
reddit.com
u/HowSway_ — 23 days ago
▲ 52 r/yimby

New York YIMBY’s 2026 First-Quarter Construction Report Tallies a Dramatic Increase in Development

YIMBY’s permit filing report for the first quarter of 2026, which tallies new building permit filings for the three-month period spanning from January through March, tallied an impressive total of 28,773 proposed residential (primarily) and hotel units, an impressive upgrade from the previous year’s average quarterly tally of 14,338.

newyorkyimby.com
u/HowSway_ — 3 months ago
▲ 26 r/yimby

2026 vs 2025 March YTD Permits Top 10

Based on the March Census Housing Permit Data.

Sorry for the basic formatting of the charts, did it during a quick break at work.

EDIT:

To clarify, first image is the top 10 gainers by percentage and second image is top 10 gainers by absolute units

u/HowSway_ — 3 months ago