u/ITContractorsUnion

Image 1 — [U.S. IT Workers]: Become A Homeland Defender For USCIS.
Image 2 — [U.S. IT Workers]: Become A Homeland Defender For USCIS.

[U.S. IT Workers]: Become A Homeland Defender For USCIS.

Homeland Defenders, Also Known As Immigration Service Officers, assist in making the decision to issue Visas.

The jobs will start sometime after September, and will be involved with deciding cases selected in the 2026 lottery.

So, if you are having trouble finding IT work, you can help participate in preventing it being given to foreigners.

Go to USAJobs.gov

https://www.usajobs.gov/search/results/?k=homeland%20defender

u/ITContractorsUnion — 8 days ago

I'm Suing A "Staffing Agency" And Recruiter For Worthlessness...

OK, so "worthlessness" in and of itself may not be a tort, but right now it looks like I've got three possible claims:

1). Negligent Hiring Of "Recruiters" By Staffing Agency:
Staffing Agency hires recruiters that have no knowledge whatsoever of subject matter, no experience doing it, nor any innate capability to EVER understand the subject matter. "Standard of Care" is to use experts to evaluate prospective applicants.

2). Negligent Hiring of Staffing Agency By Client:
A Negligent Hiring claim can be brought over the hiring of an incompetent vendor by a client on the same grounds as an employer can be sued for hiring an incompetent employee. The "Staffing Agency" "gatekeeps" submissions of resumes to the end-client, and does not submit all applicants equally. They do this because a.) They hire incompetent recruiters as in 1) above, and b.) Those recruiters are lazy, worthless, and incompetent, do not do human review of resumes and rely on an ATS to determine qualifications, because as in 1) above, they have no capacity whatsoever to relate what is on a resume to a clients actual requirements.

3). Interference With Prospective Economic Opportunity:

  1. and 2) above combine to prevent qualified persons from competing fairly for the business at hand.

There may be additional claims I can make but this is good for starters.

The lawsuit will also seek a judgement that requires a "Staffing Agency" to publish all relevant info on a job advertisement, including but not limited to: original publication date, revision history, client name, client POC, recruiter name, applications received, applications reviewed by a person, applications submitted to client and any other relevant info so that a person can verify that the job is real, and if desired, simply skip the "Staffing Agency" completely.

The use of an ATS as negligent may have some traction because that is the same type of claim that is brought against "Background Check" companies when they deliver incorrect reports, namely that they use automated, non-human systems to aggregate info, and do not do human review for correctness.

The suit is being drafted, now, and I will update this community as it progresses. If it is successful, please find lawyers who will help you do the same thing.

reddit.com
u/ITContractorsUnion — 12 days ago

A large part of recruiting hell is caused by "staffing agencies" that are basically running a skim off of other people's work.

Too many of them make their margins by exploiting H1B, H, and OPT programs. They do this because all the recruiters, managers, officers, staff and other personnel employed by the "staffing agency", have mouths to feed, and rent to pay, and other expenses, and shareholders have their ROI expectations, so basically they have to get the workers cheaper so they can skim a piece of the action, so they can live off it.

Now imagine a situation where there were no third, (and these days fourth), party middlemen were ever in the deal at all, and all persons worked either directly as employees of the end-client, or individual contractors. (i.e. owner-operator), and all those middle-people had to find their own trades, and stop skimming off of other peoples work.

Rep. Crane's proposed amendments to the INA go a LONG way toward doing that.

u/ITContractorsUnion — 27 days ago