Does anyone know what the play through requirement is for the 100% Deposit Match Bonus Offer.
I was planning on depositing $100 to get an additional $100.
But I was only going to do it if the bonus requires a 1x play through in order to be withdrawable.
Does the Bonus require a 1x play through or something crazy like a 20x play through?
I have figured out that one of the best ways to study is by creating my own LSAT questions. This has helped me understand why the right answers are right and why the wrong answers are wrong. It has also helped me put myself into the shoes of the test makers and see what they are specifically testing.
I thought I would drop some of the questions I have made and let you guys take a stab at them and let me know what you think. I am not a professional test maker or anything; I just made these for fun. All the answers will be at the end. Feel free to debate if you think another answer is better.
1) Political Analyst: For decades, reformers have proposed various measures intended to reduce the influence of extralegal considerations on jury verdicts. Yet despite repeated efforts to implement such measures, juror decision-making continues to be affected by factors unrelated to the legal merits of a case, such as perceptions of a defendant’s appearance or demeanor. Accordingly, lawmakers would be better advised to devote their efforts elsewhere, since continued legislative attempts to address juror bias are unlikely to succeed.
The Political Analyst’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it:
A. Presumes, without sufficient justification, that legislative measures are incapable of influencing juror behavior when such behavior arises from subjective human judgment.
B. Treats the persistence of a problem despite prior reform efforts as evidence that no future reform efforts could meaningfully reduce that problem.
C. Conflates the legal irrelevance of certain considerations with the claim that such considerations play no legitimate role in jury deliberations.
D. Fails to distinguish between reforms aimed at eliminating juror bias entirely and reforms aimed at mitigating its effects.
E. Bases its conclusion on an example of juror behavior that is insufficiently representative of jury decision-making as a whole.
2) Editorial: Vagueness always results in writing that is so broad or insufficiently precise that the reader cannot interpret it as having any determinate or definable meaning. Ambiguity, by contrast, always results in writing that can be interpreted in more than one distinct and determinate way. Contrary to many readers’ and writers’ beliefs, vagueness and ambiguity are independent of each other. An author can write very precisely and still produce language that lacks a determinate meaning and is therefore vague. Similarly, a statute written by lawmakers can be written with one clear goal in mind and yet be interpreted by courts as having multiple tangent meanings. Thus, the meaning intended by a writer may differ from the meaning understood by those who interpret the text.
The editorial statements, if true, most strongly support which one of the following?
A. Readers usually assign interpretations different from the author’s.
B. Limitations of language will prevent clear communication.
C. Imprecise language may give rise to multiple competing interpretations.
D. Literary works and statutes are frequently misinterpreted because of vagueness or ambiguity.
E. Vagueness can never result in ambiguity.
3) Economist: In conducting a cost-benefit analysis of a proposed project, costs are weighed against benefits. If a project involves no cost, then there is no cost against which its benefits can be compared. In such a case, the project’s benefits outweigh its costs by default. Therefore, the project should be undertaken.
The economist’s argument relies on which one of the following assumptions?
A. The project will benefit a large number of people.
B. The project has at least some benefit.
C. If the cost of a project exceeds its benefits, then the project should not be undertaken.
D. A project should be undertaken only if its benefits outweigh its costs.
E. Cost-benefit analysis is the most effective method for determining whether a project should be undertaken.
4) Lobbyist: The government claims that its citizens are free. However, under the current economic system, many citizens must work extremely long hours merely to meet basic living expenses. As a result, their choices about where to live, how to spend their time, and what opportunities to pursue are often dictated by their employment rather than made independently. Although the government does not directly prohibit citizens from making such choices, these economic constraints limit citizens’ freedom just as severely as direct government restrictions would. Therefore, the government should implement a social program designed to reduce these economic constraints on its citizens.
The lobbyist’s argument depends on which one of the following assumptions?
A. Constraints produced by economic conditions are no less restrictive of citizens’ freedom than explicit restrictions imposed by the government itself.
B. A government program designed to reduce economic constraints would not result in citizens facing economic limitations that are more restrictive than those imposed by the current system.
C. Citizens lack meaningful freedom whenever their economic circumstances significantly influence the life decisions available to them.
D. If citizens were not subject to economic necessity, most would alter their work patterns in ways that expand their range of personal choices.
E. A society in which the government refrains from directly prohibiting citizens’ actions can nevertheless fail to provide its citizens with genuine freedom.
5) A recent study of attendance patterns at the Center City Company examined employees who routinely rely on the sun to wake them up rather than alarms. The study found that a majority of such employees tend to begin their workday later than scheduled. The analysis also found that a majority of those same employees are frequently recorded as arriving late to work. Based on these findings, the analysts suggested that the use of alarms may be relevant to timely arrival at work.
Which one of the following must be true on the basis of the information above?
A. Most employees who arrive late to work do not use alarms in the morning.
B. Employees who do not use alarms are more likely to arrive late than employees who do use alarms.
C. Some employees who begin their workday later than scheduled also arrive late to work.
D. Not using an alarm contributes to both beginning the workday late and arriving late.
E. The use of alarms ensures that employees arrive at work on time.
Answers: