







Just a testimonial of my experience here. I'm a long term Comcast Internet customer in eastern Pennsylvania. In my current home, Xfinity was solid for 8 years. Seriously, the Internet only went down when the electricity did, and that's hardly Comcast's fault. I owned my own CM1000 modem, used the same modem all that time, 1gig down and 25Mb up.
Fast-forward to a few months ago, and Comcast finally upgraded locally to mid-split. Despite my modem supporting DOCSIS 3.1, my upload dropped from 25 to about 8. Pages would load slowly. I wasn't expecting mid-split speeds, but it's supposed to be backwards compatible. Legacy upstream channels dropped from 4 locked to only 1. Fair enough I thought, owning my equipment has paid for itself 10x over, so I got a $250 CM2500. Initially that fixed it, 940 down, 115 up. $100 a month isn't nice, but if it works... Soon after though, the new OFDMA upstream channel would drop daily, requiring a reboot. I scheduled for a technician (fighting with scripts trying to convince me I need their modem). During the wait for the technician, Comcast sent out texts that they are doing local maintenance, and afterwards asked if that fixed my issues... And it did, I cancelled the appointment. At this point I'm wishing they never bothered with the mid-split upgrade.
By the following month, my download speeds dropped to 300Mbps. Looking at the modem, 5 channels downstream were being dropped. A reboot would typically relock the channels, but they would drop, one by one, within the hour. I scheduled for a technician (again struggling with chat bots and scripts). I was lucky to get a tech who was competent. They told me that my account says my modem doesn't support my plan, but they accepted that was a lie from Comcast the second they saw my upload hitting over 100Mbps. They found a filter that was attached to my line specifically, removing that fixed it right away. Now getting all downstream channels locked, no uncorrectables, and the legacy upstream channels are back as well.
So here's my speculation. I believe that filter applied to my line was there since I moved in. The mid-split upgrades likely revealed the issue with having that filter. I suspect that my old modem would probably perform as expected again, not that I would go back to it, I enjoy the improved upload speed. The question remains though, why was that filter there, it was outside my apartment. Technician could only speculate that some other tech did that to stabilize the line at one point, but clearly that's no longer necessary. It's still true that OFDMA upstream was a separate issue, probably at the plant itself. Mind you, I'm fighting to keep 1gig/100Mb alive while paying $100 a month. This whole thing has me looking sideways at Comcast and cable in general. We live in an age of fiber (1gig at $70) and ~500Mbps unlimited home hotspots ($60). Comcast is still behaving like it did 15 years ago, expensive, slow and painful upgrades, fighting for fixes. It's all left a terrible taste in my mouth. Mid-split is 10 years too late, and turns stability into a mess.
The earlier days of online Netflix were great, similar to how you use Spotify-like subscriptions for music. One subscription, nearly every company's media was there. Convenience sells. But, after the streaming ecosystem fractured into 20 different pieces, there was no way to make it convenient — even if you were willing to pay for every service. Hundreds of dollars a month, you would still need a guide to know what is playable, and where. If you didn't have that kind of money, and most don't, then you're constantly managing subscribing and unsubscribing...
It's no wonder that people want to escape that hell. My escape was initially "Plex" — that remains a valid option today with my lifetime license. Over time though, I found the friction of downloading ahead of time, storing, and hosting, caused me to watch less. It's not that it was difficult to operate, it just a step backwards enough that I would procrastinate or skip watching all-together. I mostly stuck to YouTube and playing games.
A friend recently introduced me to a website named "Cineby." Not a website you should use without an ad blocker, and ideally a VPN... But it was modern and convenient enough that I wanted this on my Google TV Streamer. Unfortunately, Cineby would prove unable to operate with a TV remote. It was then I found "CinemaHQ"... Pretty much the same deal, but in app form. It's also equally sketchy, but its functionality proved the concept to me. It's free media sources weren't excellent, but when they worked it felt like magic. CinemaHQ has built-in "Debrid" API access, one of them being "TorBox." TorBox has a generous one-day free trial, full "Pro" tier access. After adding that key, I was immediately impressed. I quickly subscribed to it's $3 "Essential" monthly tier.
The appeal of trading in every subscription for $3 a month was impossible to ignore. Everything was there, available in higher quality than you'd normally get. Once you touch the word Debrid, and you have a TorBox subscription, it becomes undeniable that I was doing this the wrong way. For me, CinemaHQ was an instant taste, the gateway. To get away from the sketchiness, and to get the most out of TorBox, it was time to upgrade the frontend. Three names came up consistently, "Kodi" — ancient, "Stremio" — established, and "nuvio" — cutting-edge. Seeing as I was coming into this completely fresh, I figured I would learn via the cutting edge, nuvio.
Getting nuvio set up has made me appreciate everything ELSE a Netflix-like service does. Having the front end and links to content isn't nearly enough. In total, I had to make SEVEN accounts. TorBox subscription, a nuvio account, AIOStreams, AIOMetadata, TMDB API, and TVDB API, Trakt — with each one swapping keys with each other where necessary. Without TorBox you have no stream, without nuvio you have no front end, without AIOStreams you can't find the stream, without AIOMetadata search doesn't work, without the TMDB and TVDB APIs you have no options and information to see, without Trakt you can't keep track of what you watched. Then it became a couple of days of choosing the right settings (example; in AIOStreams — without Comet TorBox shows nothing, without catalogs search results wouldn't open content, without filters you get far too many source options.)
Luckily, the pain is worth it. Your setup is saved, it's propagated anywhere you log in — one and done. The last snag I hit was watching it all fall apart... After enjoying the fruits of my labor for a few days, yesterday (7/8/2026) nuvio's servers went down. For whatever reason, you can't just stay logged-in, and everything I set up was inaccessible on my TV. It was then I figured I'd try Stremio. Most of my work translated over pretty well, originally both AIOStreams and AIOMetadata were made for Stremio — so I was up and running relatively quickly. As a backup, it's nice to have, but it was clear it was missing a lot of nuvio's features. What stuck out to me the most was its implementation of "ExoPlayer", despite using the same name it was missing HDR and some audio formats for me. I was relieved when nuvio was back up by the end of the day.
I'm pretty late to the "debrid" party, but I believe I jumped in just before it's apex. TorBox is a few years old, and only recently has built its cache up enough to be a good, and cheap, one-stop-shop. Nuvio is only half a year old, and is still in beta. Despite any frustration, it was fun to learn, and the payoff is massive. I've already watched a few series' and movies I've been procrastinating on. Thanks for reading my journey, and if you haven't jumped in hopefully I've motivated you!
I have aiostreams, which is able to open and play media from the home page. I also have aiometadata, which was necessary to get search to show anything at all. But, after selecting something from a search, nothing loads. What am I missing here?
This was a lot of fun to set up. The latest version update let me put on that last bit of icing.
Xfinity 1gig, $100 a month. The speed test is using a Galaxy S22+ on WiFi 6e using an AXE5400 router and CM2500 modem.
Comcast finally upgraded locally, but it's a far cry from the mid/high split speeds you'll see. My gig down connection was stuck on 25 Mbps up for many years until a few weeks ago. Then... They broke my modem (kinda). They implemented a regular low split OFDM channel. My old DOCSIS 3.1 modem couldn't lock the new channel for whatever stupid Comcast reason, so I only got one legacy channel, a drop from 25 Mbps up to 10 Mbps. Comcast's fix is to get you back on their hardware, so I grabbed a new modem myself. Even though it's not mid split, the new modem locks just fine and gets 115 Mbps up, the best I've ever experienced on cable Internet around here (just took $250).
The site https://speedtestcustom.com/ , owned by Ookla, let's third parties (mostly companies) create clean, ad free, fast loading versions of the same test suite. Here's some examples, all of which are better than the regular Ookla website...
https://verizon.speedtestcustom.com/
https://trevor.speedtestcustom.com/
https://interprefy.speedtestcustom.com/
https://fusionconnect.speedtestcustom.com/
https://ost.speedtestcustom.com/
https://playstation.speedtestcustom.com/
https://why.speedtestcustom.com/
https://geek.speedtestcustom.com/
https://bestbuy.speedtestcustom.com/
Most of these I found via trial and error. You can find many more, but others will typically have https disabled or only let you test via a limited selection of servers. The ones I've linked here should be fully functional, just pick one you prefer the color scheme of.
No I didn't use AI to write this, allow me to reclaim the em dash for humanity.
I'm a long time Firefox user, and I wanted to try the Chromium side of things this year. Mostly, due to frustration around website compatibility and the speed difference. I already did a write-up on Quetta (https://www.reddit.com/r/browsers/comments/1tgqbj2/a_review_for_quetta_browser_on_android/) — excellent browser to switch to in terms of pure functionality for me. "For me" is doing so heavy lifting there, so let's go over my expectations from my browser. Then, you'll understand my frustration with Cromite, and why/how I overcame my issues...
First, I expect comprehensive ad blocking functionality. It doesn't need to be uBO (uBlock Origin), but I want feature parody. Unfortunately, almost nothing else comes close to uBO itself. I also expect extension support, password management, priority on speed over security, a bottom address bar, 20+ customizable shortcuts on the home page/new tab page, and per website zoom/dark mode. Quetta is appealing because it gets you 90% there with little effort. But, it's an incredibly compromised browser on the security and privacy side — not a big priority of mine — but even after recently updating to 1.9.0 (which took place mid way though my Cromite adventure) it's still stuck on Chromium 143. Cromite on the other hand is often only one version behind. So began my attempt to fit the circular Cromite peg into a squared hole.
As it turns out, Cromite extension stability has improved massively in recent updates, so the full fat uBO (https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/ublock-origin/cjpalhdlnbpafiamejdnhcphjbkeiagm) actually worked perfectly fine, just like it does on Firefox. Four other extensions also worked well enough. "Custom Page Zoom" extension's UI is cut off, but I only use it for TikTok to turn the desktop view into a phone friendly interface — that was successful. "MEGA Pass" extension is my password manager, and that works perfectly fine — logging in was very annoying, but once you're in it works. Using something like MEGA Pass let's you overcome the fact that Cromite has compromised password management for Android. "Simple Gestures" works exactly as expected, which I only use to close tabs with a gesture. "Sink it for Reddit" works perfectly, and makes using Reddit from the browser far better than using the app.
Next is changing it's default settings. I disabled the built in Adblock Plus, unnecessary since I have uBO. I disabled the 60hz throttle setting, very stupid to be on by default, scrolling feels normal now. Cromite has built in settings for website dark mode and page zoom, applied per website, so that's set. You can also move the whole UI to the bottom, which is my preference. Lastly, disabled restarting on connection change, good to do if you're often swapping between WiFi and cell data.
Then it was time to get speed back up... Cromite has it's default security set to extreme paranoia. I used Speedometer 3.1 to get a general idea of what settings did. On my Galaxy S22+, default Cromite scores 6, Firefox scores 7.5, Quetta scores 8.5, vanilla Chrome scores 13. Cromite speed difference can be felt, though I wouldn't say it feels as bad as that score might suggest. That said, it's pretty easy to claw back most of that speed loss by re-enabling the V8 Engine and JavaScript JIT in website settings. Just those two settings moves the score up to 10, good enough, and you feel that boost. If I'm going to use Chromium, I want that speed over Firefox.
Next was changing Chrome flags. I changed many of them, some unnecessary, others very nice to have. I won't go over everything I changed, but the result is: I'm able to change the color scheme of the UI, re-enabled some suggestion and prefetching services, disabled recent website icons from above the address bar, stopped the "close all tabs" warning, as well as a few others. Nothing here is a deal breaker, but ideal for some extra convenience and speed.
Last up was getting more websites pinned to the homepage/newtab. A seemingly simple task — necessary for my workflow, but would prove to be the majority of my adventure here... The default Chromium New Tab page only let's you pin up to 8 website links — that's not nearly enough, and it's hard coded that way. Using a new tab "dial" extension would either do nothing, or break Cromite completely (often forcing you to clear all your settings and start from scratch). Using a homepage address like "start.me" worked, but having to load/render that website every time, and fetching the link I tap, added a very annoying delay I didn't like. "Start.me" was the most basic and speedy website I found as well. I was content to leave well enough alone, but I found that you can use "data:" in the address bar to literally load HTML... Inside the address bar itself. I vibe coded, then re-did the output many times over myself, to eventually make a whole speed dial via the address bar. (https://pastebin.com/tgCj7BrZ) The challenge is mostly down to the character limit of the address bar, and the fact that the whole website needs to be in one huge line. It's silly, but it worked, I got fancy looking boxes, some tap effects, a title, and 25 pinned websites with icons — all loading instantly from the address bar itself. Unfortunately, there's one remaining issue without a solution — using a custom homepage adds a home button I don't like, and for some reason, this will make the whole browser close after closing your last tab. Yes, a custom homepage link changes what happens when you close your last tab, and there's no way around that behavior.
My last remaining nitpicks are just that — nitpicks. It took about as much effort as I thought it would, far too much, but the results are great. Happily daily driving my configuration for about a week without crashing or other issues.
Closing thoughts here... I understand my expectations are very personal, and a lot of what I said is specific to me. But, hopefully you'll find it interesting. Though I will say, I think many people would find a version of Cromite that only adds extension support and a few extra settings very appealing — at least half of what I did was getting back default Chromium features and speed. That friction alone I can easily see putting off many regular users — I understand the point of Cromite is privacy, but there's a big hole to fill in the Chromium fork market here.
As a long time Firefox user on Android, I wanted to try the Chrome side of things long term. But, I would only do so without any personal experience compromises. Out of the many Chromium based browsers I tried, Quetta fit the best in terms of functionality. There's lots to be excited about regarding this browser. It's appropriate to first celebrate what it does well, then I'll pour some cold water on it, see what you think. I'll avoid rumors and conjecture, simply judging what's actually here.
First up is it's ad blocking capability. There are many Android browsers out there now with built-in ad blocking, most notably Brave browser. But the offering here stands apart from the competition in some pretty significant ways. Most notably, it's ad blocking engine, built into the browser, is most similar to uBlock Origin — complete with uBO formatted rules and filters, and an element picker to create custom rules on the fly. It comes with an extensive collection of lists to block ads, and is also capable of collapsing the blocked area entirely, rather than creating empty space. Typically, you would need to install the Manifest Version 2 version of uBO, or use Firefox, to get an ad blocking experience on par. You can also adjust zoom levels, force website dark mode, and view desktop mode, saved on a per website basis. A standout feature is the ability to download pictures and video, even when it would typically be blocked by the website. Lastly, you can install desktop style extensions from the Chrome store, and the implementation appears more stable than the competition. This comes all wrapped up in a very custom and comfy user interface that is highly customizable.
Out the gate, Quetta appears to be a no-brainer. Unfortunately, the recommendation comes with caution. First off, this is not an open source project, and the team behind it has ambitions to monetize. This is most similar to Brave browser, but even Brave is open source. In terms of privacy, it's best to assume this is no more private than using vanilla Chrome. The nature of having such a highly customized project, and a team as small as theirs, means that they'll often be pretty far behind on the latest version of Chromium. At the time of writing, May 18th 2026, their last update was 3 weeks ago. That last update was already a few versions behind the latest version of Chromium. At the moment, Chromium is up to version 149, whereas Quetta is still using 143. Assuming they're able to keep up well enough with updates, you're still left with blind trust due to the closed source, and you risk the future bringing nasty monetization practices.
The result of this means recommendation is rather conditional. The features on tap here are compelling, and for those moving from Firefox on android, may be difficult to resist from a pure usability standpoint. But the closed source and uncertain future means, even if you do use it, you may want to avoid doing banking, and be prepared for a time when you'll switch to an alternative. Currently, the best alternatives available to you, that avoid heavy monetization and can come close to the features here using extensions, is the Helium browser and Cromite via GitHub. Brave browser is an honorable mention, if you're willing to disable its many money making features, and you don't need extensions. For the time being, I'm using Quetta as a daily driver, but ready to jump ship if need be.