u/Impressive_Oil4165

There is so much discussion on the implementation of rowlatt act in history books about how the law was draconian(which it was), a law that takes away the right for a person to defend himself/herself in a court. They state this law as the lowest of the low and how innocent civilians were killed and wrongfully sentenced using this law.

At the same time having it's own Rowlatt act. Such irony!! And the same mainland Indians who speak so much against the Rowlatt act will spin and heads and tails to justify AFSPA act.

Why such hypocrisy?