Is a steel frame really the right choice as a lighter cyclist?
I am a female cyclist that is 1,60 m tall as weights around 50 kg - so generally a more petite build.
I did my first 8 month tour on an average AL trekking bike that I already had and used for commuting and city cycling. I had loads of fun with that bike, it worked perfectly for bicycle travel with no goals. But it would’ve not been suitable for going on longer stretches of gravel for example and had some limitations when it came to mountings.
Now that I am looking to upgrade to a more suitable adventure/ gravel bike I am questioning whether steel would be the right choice for me.
I understand why steel is awesome. It’s unbreakable, can be repaired everywhere in the world and you can load it to the brim.
But I’ve noticed that a lot of AL gravel bikes made with bikepacking in mind have a weight limit of around 120 kg. With my weight that would mean that I still could add around a 50-55 kg load besides myself to even reach the limit. Which seems more than enough.
And by getting an AL bike I could shave off a bit of that bicycle weight which is nice for those times I would have to carry the bicycle.
Am I missing some draw backs of AL? What are your options about steel vs. AL for lighter cyclists?
I appreciate any options. Thx:)