[ Removed by Reddit ]
[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]
[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]
I've spent the last few months obsessively researching GEO (Generative Engine Optimization), AEO, AI Search, AI Citations, and what some people are now calling Agentic Search Optimization.
The deeper I go, the more I feel that the industry is focusing on the wrong layer.
Most GEO discussions today revolve around:
These things matter.
But after testing dozens of brands across ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity, I keep seeing the same pattern:
A company can have a "perfect" GEO score and still never get recommended.
Meanwhile, another company with a mediocre website gets mentioned constantly.
That led me to a question:
Are we optimizing pages when we should be optimizing entities?
My current thinking is that AI visibility is driven by three layers:
Can AI systems find your content?
Will AI actually use your content as evidence?
Does the model believe your brand deserves to be recommended?
This seems heavily influenced by:
This is where many GEO tools stop short.
They audit websites, but they don't explain:
>
Lately I've also been exploring what I call AGO (Agent Optimization).
The hypothesis is that future discovery won't happen through a single answer engine.
Instead:
In that world, we're no longer optimizing for retrieval alone.
We're optimizing for an entire decision-making process.
I'm considering building a product around this idea.
Not another GEO score checker.
More like:
Before I spend months building it, I'd love to hear from people working in SEO, GEO, AI Search, or SaaS.
A few questions:
Would appreciate any thoughts, criticism, or holes in the model.