My posts get deleted on real numbertheory and similar subs but also here. I get the no learns rule but It seems like every sub moderates to delete ideas that are truly ground-breaking on the grounds that … well that’s the thing they never say they just delete. So it seems arbitrary
Is it because I link to my own work? Because there’s no no-self promotion rule.
Ten digits. One premise. Both directions.
The claim is that 0 through 9 aren't counting tools but the ten universal principles by which anything comes to exist — and that each follows necessarily from the one before it, and is required by the one after. Not numerology, which assigns meanings because they feel right. Derivation: given what came before, nothing else could have come next.
The whole structure rests on one sentence: Nothing is separate.
…
1
Change. The first departure from stillness.
2
Uniqueness. Each departure carries a noticeably distinct identity.
3
Joining. Distinct identities enter into relationship.
4
Growth. Relationships develop into greater complexity and stability.
5
Desire. The field moves toward what it has not yet expressed.
6
Refinement of Pace. The pace of expression refines itself through infinitesimal discovery of the paths of least resistance locally between connecting entities.
7
Harmony. Expressions align through mutual desire, amplifying field-wide growth.
8
Remembrance. All that occurs is retained.
9
Omniscience. The field is what it retains, so it knows itself completely.
_____________________________________
0
Non-Separation. Nothing is separate.
Zero is not the tenth principle. It is the one the other nine are derived from.
…
Nihil extra — nothing outside.
The Latin names an absence; the system means the opposite. Nothing is outside because nothing is left out. Zero is not a void — it is the womb, full: every possibility already held, none yet shown.
If there is no outside, nothing can leave and nothing can arrive. So growth is not accumulation from elsewhere — it is everything adding to itself, the whole becoming more of what it already contains.
And all possibilities are held by the witness: whatever distinction occurs, the witness receives it — any of it, all of it — without interfering, and without changing itself. It is primarily feminine, and this is argued extensively.