Honest question regarding correspondence games
Sorry for the ugly cropped image.
A couple weeks ago I posted this, regarding a game I was currently playing against a guy with almost (now it's passed) 28k games, barely above 1000 on blitz and rapid, but smoking past 2300 on correspondence chess. I didn't search further for as long as I was playing him, but after losing I ran the computer eval on all of his recent games, and found that, not only he had won his last 13 correspondence rated games, he won all of them with extremely high accuracy (95x1, 97x2, 98x3, 99x7). Funnily enough, he also has hundreds of unrated correspondence games against stockfish, from setup positions, which was very weird.
I don't think it's that much of a jump to assume that this 1100 rapid playing perfectly on correspondence was suspicious enough to be reported, and so I did, including everything I found suspicious while playing him, all the casual stockfish games from setup positions, and a link to every recent victory, with the percentage attached.
It has been a couple weeks now, and I'm growing doubtful that something will be done about it. So I have an honest question: Is Lichess more lenient towards cheating when said cheating seems to be exclusively done on correspondence? Because I don't think there's any way to frame this as if it's still plausible this guy is playing at 99% accuracy just by having access to the database.
(the screenshot was taken from my browser, the game accuracy shows beneath the games because I use lichess tools)