u/InvisibleHand555

Who determined that Metaphysics is a "Primary Branch of Philosophy" anyways?

Wouldn't Metaphysics not be more naturally aligned with physics?

OK, are we all so sure the academic definition of "Metaphysics" is not a psyop - or at best an innocent misunderstanding?

Are we being misdirected – so we don't discover that higher knowledge (meta-knowledge) can actually be derived and gained from simple observation of the physical world around us, by cause and relative effect, and then confirmed by objective, mathematical relationships?

Where we make the leap from endless complicated equations, to:

1. The world is 100% mathematically absolute and full circle.
2. Where we understand the SEE the world has direction, and for a reason, that is toward efficiency via cooperation, that manifests attraction - that manifests physical creation -that holds the whole world together...that determines the world, one moment to the next.
3. Where we can now profoundly understand the reason for physical success (creation) and physical failure (decay) – that could not be more profoundly simple.
4. Where we can understand physical "force", that's only required when it's against nature's direction – to begin to understand morality, and even higher, spirituality. To find they're all by the same reason...just at different degrees of perception.
5. Where it's possible to gain "real metaphysical wisdom", like, "You can't cheat the world. Not without cheating yourself to the very same degree". Not because you philosophized about it, but because you observed it and measured it...to find it could not be more self-evident - that the world is 100% full-circle. That makes it inescapable.

Or, instead, are we being misdirected – to think that metaphysics is simply a woo-woo "science", camouflaging objective, absolute "universal wisdom" - disguised as a touchy-feely mystical "philosophy" – so objective wisdom is lost in endless touchy-feely mystical gobbledygook?

But I'm probably just crazy...