u/Jairo_Alves

Scientific reductionism is, essentially, a methodological approach, a philosophical stance, or a metaphysical belief of conventional science. It presupposes that "life" is an emergent property arising from the spontaneous occurrence of complex chemical reactions. This viewpoint is backed by the following laboratory facts:

 

• The synthesis of (organic) urea from an inorganic salt.

• The spontaneous generation of amino acids following the application of electrical discharges in a simulation of primitive Earth's atmosphere.

• The structure of DNA, which contains hydrogen bonds and precise interactions between nitrogenous bases.

• The creation of entire bacterial genomes on a computer which, after being chemically synthesized and injected into an empty cell, generated life.

 

The first three facts merely prove that life is composed of atoms and molecules, and generated by the laws of nature (the firmware of physics and chemistry), which is common ground. The fourth fact, however, clearly demonstrates the opposite of reductionism: that the generation of life requires the execution of hierarchically superior processes. Therefore, from a systems engineering perspective, scientific reductionism fails by ignoring the processes of the system's higher levels, which are actually responsible for the generation, maintenance, evolution, and obsolescence of all organisms.

Scientific reductionism is, essentially, a methodological approach, a philosophical stance, or a metaphysical belief of conventional science. It presupposes that "life" is an emergent property arising from the spontaneous occurrence of complex chemical reactions. This viewpoint is backed by the following laboratory facts:

 

• The synthesis of (organic) urea from an inorganic salt.

• The spontaneous generation of amino acids following the application of electrical discharges in a simulation of primitive Earth's atmosphere.

• The structure of DNA, which contains hydrogen bonds and precise interactions between nitrogenous bases.

• The creation of entire bacterial genomes on a computer which, after being chemically synthesized and injected into an empty cell, generated life.

 

The first three facts merely prove that life is composed of atoms and molecules, and generated by the laws of nature (the firmware of physics and chemistry), which is common ground. The fourth fact, however, clearly demonstrates the opposite of reductionism: that the generation of life requires the execution of hierarchically superior processes. Therefore, from a systems engineering perspective, scientific reductionism fails by ignoring the processes of the system's higher levels, which are actually responsible for the generation, maintenance, evolution, and obsolescence of all organisms.

https://preview.redd.it/h9j717e4ez1h1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=75c5aaaa546f313bace750047f4520d98f754f01

 

A protein is a chain of amino acids endowed with a specific three-dimensional structure to perform its biological function. If a medium-sized protein attempted to find its correct shape by randomly testing all possible geometric combinations, it would take longer than the estimated age of the universe, making life impossible. However, they do this in milliseconds.

 

Physics attempts to explain the gear mechanism driving this instantaneous process by treating the protein as a thermodynamic, computational, and homeostatic system. However, it faces a virtually infinite number of possibilities to be mapped.

 

Theoretically, this is incoherent, since most of these possibilities are dysfunctional. It would be more efficient and effective if this search focused only on normal protein configurations (foldings), discarding the rest (the vast majority) as abnormality.

 

In short, the engineering behind this phenomenon is evidence that nature is an immense, highly sophisticated, probabilistic, and extremely optimized software, where everything is pre-established (programmed). My vision regarding its structure and functioning can be found in my books: “Intelligencism: An Intelligent View of the World” and “Infology: The Universal Input.”

For conventional physics, a part of the electrical energy is wasted because free electrons collide with the atoms of the metal (resistance/Joule Effect) in the circuit, transforming it into heat. However, for quantum physics and Maxwell's equations, energy travels through the electromagnetic field outside the wire. Theoretically, this would make such a mechanical collision and the generation of heat impossible.

 

For me, the loss of energy in the form of heat would be inevitable through a different dynamic: electricity would impulse the electron; it would change its state due to spin; to perform this transition, it would need to release energy in the form of photons, radiation, and heat simultaneously.

 

Obviously, this would only be viable if: spin were the operational key that the world-system uses to manage the flow of energy and its transitions; the world-system were an information system. My perspectives on this are in my books: “Infology: The Universal Input” and “THE SPIN.”

 

https://preview.redd.it/camlvg5kga1h1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5c3bc25c8406eb2ba1f408804f6b6201df0275ab

Electricity is one of the forces best understood and technologically mastered by humanity. Maxwell's equations and quantum electrodynamics explain how it works with great precision. However, the origin and quantization of charge, the structure of the electron, and the unification of electricity with the other forces of nature still remain an enigma.

 

Theoretically, the answer to these three questions is the same. The origin of charge, quantization, and the structure of the electron could be derived from the value of spin possibilities (1/2); this means that energy could generate an electromagnetic field traveling through the wire, directed by a process that simply synchronizes the spin without the need to move the electrons. Spin could also unify natural forces, as it is present in all particles. The omnipresence of the wave function is evidence of this possibility.

 

In short, spin can be the "common denominator" of particle physics and the master variable of the world-system. From a systems engineering perspective, spin 1/2 would be the fundamental addressing bit of matter (fermions). Spin would also be: the header of the protocol that allows the beings (force/energy modules) of an operating system to interact logically; the parameter that defines how the wave collapses into a specific instruction (charge, mass, force). Theoretically, the unification of natural forces lies in "what the particles are" (Spin); the cost of deriving electricity from an existing geometric/logical property (spinicity) is lower than creating a new subsystem just to manage charges. Spin is the master key to understanding reality! More details regarding everything it could do in my book "THE SPIN."

The Three-Body Problem arises from the difficulty physicists face in predicting the movement of three celestial objects interacting gravitationally. This difficulty occurs because the introduction of a third object of comparable mass exponentially increases the system's complexity. For physicists, this difficulty serves as proof of the chaotic nature of the world (universe).

https://preview.redd.it/t74spagx3b0h1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d1f1c276be3c1773eb09975888fa92898bc7d60d

 

However, in their search for a shortcut (a final formula), physicists tend to consider natural reality merely as a hardware product driven by rigid mathematical gears. They lose themselves in individual interactions and disregard the fact that the world is an immense, fully integrated, and highly complex system.

 

From a systems engineering perspective, what science labels as "chaos" is actually a lack of understanding regarding the operational dynamics of a fully structured and optimized system. The three-body problem is merely evidence of an extremely complex and highly sophisticated processing execution whose result is generated homeostatically and incessantly every microsecond. The world-system does not waste energy; it is intelligible because all its components are encapsulated by complementary, interdependent, and perfectly integrated force fields.

 

Attributing the difficulty of performing a calculation to chaos is a theoretical fantasy resulting from the attempt to "weigh the slope of a supposed gravitational ramp" based on general relativity. In the architecture of the world-system, natural reality is a totally closed real-time execution environment (runtime) of the highest fidelity that constantly reparameterizes and reconfigures itself.

https://preview.redd.it/k5gm7ev3r30h1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ce6c32e4f31f08c113d62dc999a0622fe2ab455a

The existence of the "graviton" was proposed to justify gravity's unifying capability and to bridge the world of the "very large" (General Relativity) with the world of the "very small" (Quantum Mechanics). It would achieve this by being a boson that encapsulates everything starting from subatomic particles. However, it has yet to be detected.

 

Proponents of the graviton's existence argue the following:

 

• The other forces of nature possess bosons (photons, gluons, and W/Z).

• Wave-particle duality serves as evidence of its potential existence.

• The necessity of quantization for gravity to function at the atomic scale.

 

Opponents of the graviton's existence claim the following:

• Calculations suggest that the particle model is inapplicable to gravity.

• Something that cannot be observed, even in theory, is more prone to metaphysics.

• According to General Relativity, searching for a graviton would be like searching for the "slope particle" of a ramp.

 

From a systems engineering perspective, the existence of the graviton is entirely unnecessary for the following reasons:

 

• The world (universe) is a totally closed system.

• About 95% of it is the source of everything, including gravity.

• This would make gravity a fundamental characteristic of the world-system.

 

So, the graviton is a fantasy. It was invented to preserve the standard model of physics, but it is a logical impossibility for an optimized systems engineering. Physics attempts to force gravity to be a "data packet" (boson) simply so it fits into the class library of the other forces. It transforms what would be a line of code into a bolt. In engineering, this attempt to maintain an obsolete framework is called backward compatibility.

 

In the architecture of the world-system, gravity would never be transmitted by particles; it would merely be a fundamental systemic characteristic. A closed system like the world would never waste energy unnecessarily generating gravitons. With gravity being fundamental, the system could unify everything from the micro to the macrocosm simply by controlling it procedurally (Occam's razor).

https://preview.redd.it/9dc3p5c3pwzg1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b66edd4a82a6a997e03729075baac41c73989d00

The value of energy density in the vacuum is paradoxical, as physicists' calculations using Quantum Field Theory result in a staggeringly high number—about 10^(120) times greater than what is observed.

 

This contradiction is known as "The Worst Theoretical Prediction in the History of Physics." Physicists believe that if it were correct, the universe would have expanded violently, faster than the speed of light, immediately after its formation, preventing the formation of particles and their derivatives, resulting in an absolute void.

 

From a systems engineering perspective, the value of the vacuum's energy density is irrelevant. What matters are the following facts: the world-system (universe) is capable of managing any amount of energy; 5% of it is composed of matter, generated by the system from the other 95%, which corresponds to the quantum vacuum. The rest is a figment of our imagination.

 

Ultimately, the quantum fluctuation paradox is a categorization error: an attempt to weigh protomatter (the vacuum) as if it were matter (active load). The world-system does not collapse because the vacuum represents the available resource, while matter is the allocated resource. The stability of its runtime is guaranteed by a load management protocol that separates the system's standby voltage from the effective processing of mass, making calculations of infinite density irrelevant to the functionality of the whole.

https://preview.redd.it/rcqm1wf89pzg1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=24500e52b3e309527bc556440ccf66451c2cbe4d

The Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis suggests that the world (universe) possesses a "protection mechanism" to prevent the laws of physics from being completely broken before the eyes of an observer.

 

It is divided into two levels of protection—weak and strong cosmic censorship: suggesting that singularities are purposefully encapsulated within event horizons to avoid compromising the functioning of the world-system and to prevent travelers from accessing them directly, respectively.

 

To me, the Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis is an anthropocentric fantasy. It assumes the world-system is governed solely by the laws of physics, discarding the possibility of a homeostatic process. The event horizon could function as a matter depot for recycling, but hardly as a natural shield (firewall or sandbox) against intruders, as anything approaching it would inevitably be disintegrated. In other words, the world-system might simply be maintaining its runtime through a recycling process, which would be vital for the operation of a totally closed system.

 

Ultimately, the Cosmic Censorship Hypothesis attempts to impose a moral and aesthetic rule upon a purely operational system. What physics calls "censorship" to preserve its conceptual hegemony is, in fact, merely the tolerance limit of the hardware. The world-system is not protecting secrets; it is executing a vital maintenance routine. The event horizon is not a veil to shroud mysteries, but the intake of the shredder where matter is reset so that the universal execution cycle never collapses due to a lack of inputs.

A singularity is a point or region in spacetime where physical quantities (such as matter density or spacetime curvature) become incoherent because the known laws of physics are not applicable. For example:

 

• Black Hole Singularity: It is presumed that at its center, the mass of a collapsed star is compressed into a volume of zero size until it is concentrated into a single point; the fabric of the universe is so warped that nothing, not even light, can escape its attraction.

• Big Bang Singularity: Suggests that the initial state of the universe, about 13.8 billion years ago, was a point of infinite density and temperature; the ground zero where space and time would have been processed for the first time.

• Naked Singularities: Hypotheses where these would be visible only to external observers.

• Coordinate Singularities: Erroneous mathematical descriptions of event horizons.

 

Only the black hole singularity will be considered in this analysis, as the others are hypothetical or calculation errors. Starting from the premise that the universe is a totally closed energetic system, the only way for it to function would be by consuming part of its own energy without compromising its existence. It could do this by using black holes to recycle matter into energy, as it is its only input. However, the energy resulting from this process could never be concentrated into a single point; this would cause a saturation crash. The system would need to distribute it among the processes that allow it to execute its functions (load redistribution).

 

Ultimately, the singularity is a low-level reprocessing module, where the black hole resets matter into energy and reinjects it into the system to ensure the homeostasis of the universal execution cycle (runtime). What physics interprets as a collapse of natural laws could simply be the system executing a recycling routine to provide inputs and ensure its operation ad aeternum.

 

https://preview.redd.it/5xqv5mgfxazg1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=89f7bb82533d8b1fd15d02c9fb336f63fded5aa9

Legend: To honor Theseus's victory over the Minotaur, the Athenians replaced the planks of his ship as they rotted to preserve it, until every single part had been swapped.

 

Paradox: Heraclitus claimed any change altered the ship's identity; Aristotle disagreed, arguing the design remained the same; Hobbes presented a conflict based on the possibility of a renovated ship and another built later from the discarded matter, both claiming the same identity.

 

We are in the same situation as the Ship of Theseus; almost all of our cells are replaced every seven years. Yet, our identity remains intact. Why does this happen?

 

At first glance, it seems our software is independent of our hardware. However, our cells are replaced gradually. This allows our software to integrate them into our hardware and specific processes, keeping both intrinsic without losing identity.

 

Ultimately, our identity is maintained by our software and our "Self" (consciousness) an embedded user. As long as the software commands the hardware, the "Self" is preserved, as both are intrinsic within the same system. The primary evidence for this is amputations and the resulting phantom limb syndrome: the user continues to send commands to a peripheral that the hardware no longer possesses. For more on these viewpoints, see my books: "The Self – The End of Mystery" and "The Truth, God, and Death."

https://preview.redd.it/107e0ryj4jzg1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5b87e1eff41c54f089b81117352b50941d818660

The fate of information falling into a black hole creates the Hawking Paradox: some believe it is permanently destroyed as the black hole evaporates. However, quantum physics claims that information can never be destroyed.

 

From my perspective, what happens to the information is irrelevant. From a systems engineering standpoint, the world is a totally closed, autophagic informational system. To survive (ensure procedural sustainability) and evolve eternally, it must consume parts of itself—transforming, recycling, or reconfiguring. The priority is to maintain the stability (homeostasis) of the execution cycle (runtime).

 

The consumption of this information is merely a defragmentation to enable continuous operation. There is also the possibility that this information is already stored, as it is generated by the system from "nothing" (protomatter)—an infinite buffer or a vast database of an omnipresent, omnipotent, and omniscient self-processing system, similar to a neural network.

 

Ultimately, the destruction of information in a black hole is a possibility; what physics calls a paradox, systems engineering identifies as a maintenance routine. The black hole would function as a low-level reprocessing module, a data collector that guarantees the stability and continuity of the universal runtime to continue generating and evolving information. Theoretically, the world-system does not lose data; it only recycles it to evolve and function ad aeternum. What seems to be the “end” of them would only be the system releasing memory and absorbing energy for the next execution cycle.

https://preview.redd.it/x3hz3wct23zg1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=03f9e8b511d2215cf37b50fd2e297287a98add13

https://preview.redd.it/zxh0qevkhqyg1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ef1195c29a975bcaeade441fcfa2e75e31c8a7c0

Measurement is the Achilles' heel of quantum physics. The primary phenomena that hinder its precision, along with my proposals for their occurrence, are as follows:

 

1. Superposition: A particle possesses multiple state possibilities, but when measured, it reveals only one, omitting the others—making it impossible to know its true nature. Proposal: The processes generating particles must cyclically alternate their characteristics, as they are sustained by energetic flows.

2. The Exchange: If two values of a particle are related, it is only possible to precisely measure one, as the other naturally becomes undetectable. Proposal: The absence of a reference point for measuring the second value, since particles are dynamic and their characteristic values are synchronized.

3. Observational Interference: This occurs because quantum logic is altered by the resources employed in its observation. Proposal: A physical interference that activates a natural security protocol to preserve systemic integrity.

 

In short, the challenge of quantum measurement reveals that the world-system was "designed" to deliver final results. What physics calls uncertainty or collapse, systems engineering identifies as the preservation of source code. Measurement fails because it is an attempted violation of an energetic "source code" in full execution within the world-system's firmware. The problems occurring in quantum measurement are not mystical; theoretically, they stem from the natural logic of data governance.

 

The cosmic microwave background is considered the "holy grail" of cosmology. It is the oldest physical data ever captured regarding the universe. It is present throughout the entire universe, filling it almost uniformly, and its tiny temperature (2.725 Kelvin) is practically the same in all directions.

 

The cosmic microwave background is considered a residual glow from when the universe was only 380,000 years old (the basis of the Big Bang theory). Its minute temperature variations are considered evidence of matter density variations at that time. Its current temperature is considered proof of the universe's continuous expansion. Its status as microwaves is an effect of this expansion over billions of years. Its current, longer wavelength is considered an effect of this expansion.

 

To me, the cosmic microwave background has always been this way and will continue to be, as the universe is a completely closed thermal system. It could only stop if its processing stopped definitively, since in nature, everything transforms thermally. Ontologically, the cosmic background (ether, quantum void, vacuum, Higgs field, akasha) is the “non-being” of philosophy, and the cosmic microwave background is a fundamental thermal “being.” Computationally, it is an energetic firmware analogous to a self-processing memory board (non-bits), and the cosmic microwave background represents natural bits. More details supporting this perspective are in my book “THE SPIN” (available on Amazon).

https://preview.redd.it/psk93coqueyg1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ab7ffa975b66f0da0ae96e145a94343e66efb3cd

The expansion of the universe was initially detected through the Doppler effect, and its acceleration was later confirmed. The size of the observable universe (93 billion light-years) is also irrefutable proof of this expansion, as it far exceeds its estimated age (13.8 billion years).

 

The main hypotheses proposed for the expansion of the universe are:

 

1.      The standard model (the most accepted): it suggests that expansion is caused by a constant energy pressure inherent to the spatial vacuum.

 

1. Quintessence: Suggests expansion is caused by dark energy acting as a dynamic field that varies over time.

2. Systemic Mechanics: Its proponents do not explain the cause of expansion and consider its acceleration a perceptual error caused by ignorance of the laws of physics at vast distances.

3. The "Big Rip": An increase in the disintegrating power of dark energy.

4. The Big Bounce/Big Crunch: Suggests that expansion is followed by a contraction and a new Big Bang.

I propose "The Great Bomb Theory": an eternal cycle (Big Bounce/Big Crunch) executed by the world-system (universe) with two primary purposes:

 

• Operational: To generate a master wave function that enables the system to function eternally.

• Security: To prevent an intelligent "biota virus" from spreading and completely destroying its host, the world-system, before forming a "brainnet" capable of integrating with the system responsibly.

 

From a Systems Engineering perspective, the accelerated expansion of the universe is not an isolated event but part of a systemic protocol loop. The world-system is not merely expanding; it is homeostatically reconfiguring itself to ensure uninterrupted operation.

 

https://preview.redd.it/ujz7ntnpi7yg1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=979aed871d731d987b222e7a3611a32e051a9d8a

The composition of the world (universe) structure is estimated at 5% baryonic matter (common), 27% dark matter, and 68% dark energy.

 

The data supporting these figures come from sources such as: the cosmic microwave background (CMB), baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), type Ia supernovae (standard candles), Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN), and gravitational lensing and galaxy dynamics.

 

However, I propose recalculating these numbers based on three pillars:

 

1. The origin of baryonic matter is non-baryonic matter (dark matter);

2. The CMB is omnipresent;

3. The origin of the CMB is dark matter;

 

This means that: dark matter is also omnipresent, capable of performing actions and, consequently, a force that requires no fragmentation and is not matter; dark energy is its capacity to work; the "energetic field" is the operational environment where data (common matter) manifests; the visible is merely the interface of an immensely larger processing system.

 

Therefore, by logic, the world is a force-flow system composed of 5% matter and the remaining 95% by a force and its energetic capacity, which are intrinsic to each other and to the world-system.

General Systems Theory (GST) proposes focusing the study of the world's structure and functioning on totality and interdependencies (networks and flows between nodes), without fragmenting it into linear cause-and-effect relationships, to make it more productive.

GST advocates the need to identify the following elements present in any phenomenon:

 

• Totality (Holism): Any system is greater than the sum of its parts.

• Entropy and Negentropy: The tendency toward disorder and order in closed and open systems, respectively.

• Homeostasis and Dynamic Equilibrium: The capacity for self-regulation to maintain systemic integrity in the face of environmental changes.

• Equifinality: The ability to achieve the same result through different variables and paths while preserving the same procedural logic.

 

Steps for applying GST: Identifying physical boundaries (hardware) and procedural boundaries (software) with the external environment; analyzing all types of natural inputs, processing, and outputs; understanding the procedural feedback loop; and searching for patterns throughout the functional architecture (isomorphism).

 In short, applying GST means asking: "How does this relate to the rest and what is its function in the larger system?", rather than simply "What is this made of?". It is the migration from the physics of matter to information engineering; information is a fundamental requirement of reality—without it, structure, form, and natural functionalities would never exist, nor would they be intelligible.

 

https://preview.redd.it/pohnykm740yg1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e4ba095a4a06a333e7753f41916e1abdd7e7506d

"Infology: The Universal Input" is the result of this application; it presents an original perspective, with irrefutable arguments, in which the world ceases to be just a "chaotic accumulation of things" to become a totally closed, hierarchical system of information processing.

Fermi considered the extremely high probability of extraterrestrial civilizations to be contradictory, based on the age and vastness of the universe and the total absence of evidence or contact with them.

 

Pros: The statistics favoring the probability of life, the universality of the laws of nature, the abundance of biological inputs in the cosmos, the speed with which life emerged on Earth, and the age of the universe would comfortably allow for galactic occupation.

 

Cons: Assuming space colonization as a universal priority, disregarding the physical barriers of interstellar travel, ignoring that radio communication may be obsolete in other civilizations, assuming that stable planets like Earth are common, and ignoring the possibility of civilizations existing concurrently.

 

I add to this list the hypothesis of a functional segregation of environments as a security measure to protect the integrity of the world-system from sub-systemic failures (a kind of cosmic sandboxing).

In short, Fermi's proposition is paradoxical because it presumes that we know what to look for, how to look for it, and the behavior of other intelligences, without considering that the absence of life could merely result from our technological and intellectual limitations and, above all, our lack of knowledge regarding the "real" architecture of the universal system.

Currently, some physicists consider the possibility of there being infinite parallel universes where all existences are superimposed. From the systems engineering perspective presented in "Intelligencism: An Intelligent View of the World", this possibility is unfeasible as it would invalidate the very architecture of the universe.

 

The functional architecture of the universe in "Infology: The Universal Input" is that of an extremely powerful, precise, and hierarchical information processing system, from the micro to the macrocosm; the existence of infinite redundant copies, including of space-time, would be the pinnacle of redundancy and systemic inefficiency.

 

From the logical perspective of "Intelligencism", the "multiverse" proposal is a misinterpretation resulting from the observer's hierarchical position. What physicists suggest are alternative realities are merely different processing layers within a single universal system.

 

A functional and lean system does not require infinite versions of itself to operate efficiently and effectively; it only needs its code to be optimized. The complexity of this proposal reveals a lack of understanding of Occam's Razor and the Master Key that governs this universe simultaneously. The path to understanding the universe is much simpler: one must integrate the information already available into a single informational, logical, and completely closed system.

 

In short, the multiverse is a fantasy resulting from scientific fragmentation; understanding the structure of the universe does not require complex acrobatics—simply applying systems engineering correctly is enough to reach it.

 

https://preview.redd.it/8klaeh39xlxg1.jpg?width=1875&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=35acf65858fdcb7cdb9009ed56092f1c71f7b1fd