u/Jim-Zhiwu

Image 1 — 250 outlets covered his “plagiarism” accusations. Yet, when a white professor at the same university did the same, only one outlet reported it.
Image 2 — 250 outlets covered his “plagiarism” accusations. Yet, when a white professor at the same university did the same, only one outlet reported it.
Image 3 — 250 outlets covered his “plagiarism” accusations. Yet, when a white professor at the same university did the same, only one outlet reported it.
Image 4 — 250 outlets covered his “plagiarism” accusations. Yet, when a white professor at the same university did the same, only one outlet reported it.
Image 5 — 250 outlets covered his “plagiarism” accusations. Yet, when a white professor at the same university did the same, only one outlet reported it.
Image 6 — 250 outlets covered his “plagiarism” accusations. Yet, when a white professor at the same university did the same, only one outlet reported it.
Image 7 — 250 outlets covered his “plagiarism” accusations. Yet, when a white professor at the same university did the same, only one outlet reported it.
Image 8 — 250 outlets covered his “plagiarism” accusations. Yet, when a white professor at the same university did the same, only one outlet reported it.

250 outlets covered his “plagiarism” accusations. Yet, when a white professor at the same university did the same, only one outlet reported it.

The media’s bias toward the oppressor group feels disturbingly familiar across different societies.

Edit : 250 articles, not necessarily individual news outlets*

u/Jim-Zhiwu — 2 days ago

After examining 82 prosecution witnesses, our "meritorious" courts acquited all accused free.

​

source: @dalit_history on instagram

u/Jim-Zhiwu — 13 days ago