u/Jmacduff

Contrary to posts Lovable Credit Use Seems Normal, what tool are you using?

Contrary to posts Lovable Credit Use Seems Normal, what tool are you using?

Hello,

Just my perspective it seems like the community is getting a lot of posts around "this got too expensive" or "it's using too many credits for the prompt" recently. It feels like every other post is "This is too expensive!!" and they never ever share details.

My experience is very different with Lovable and I wanted to share actual concrete data.

Generally speaking these posts loosely describe "I asked for X and it cost Y and that's bad" scenario without sharing real information. I have not seen a single post actually share the prompts and outcome in terms of costs.

Below are 4 real prompts I did this morning as a test of costs.

Context: I have a existing Dashboard app (~140 pages) and I am adding a new Product so just doing some basic clean up on the new pages. Below are 4 real prompts + costs done today.

Scenario 1:

I asked it to disable a button and it cost me 1 credit.

https://preview.redd.it/4k38p27brb2h1.png?width=522&format=png&auto=webp&s=489fcc6f822eed5cbec2501efb27cd03e43e9cf3

Scenario 2:

On one of the pages there was a existing json parsing bug, I asked it to fix it and it cost me 0 credits

https://preview.redd.it/b6dc04firb2h1.png?width=433&format=png&auto=webp&s=f398ce1441f9f5566f7fe7f25eb88349e070bf8e

Scenario 3:

Update 2 big dashboard pages and add test to all the sections explaining the data. This is a big grey prompt since I am expecting it too add detailed text. it cost me 6 credits

https://preview.redd.it/oj8pmbmprb2h1.png?width=556&format=png&auto=webp&s=1131dbf1a61e505a6e872dc84b3c0aa19821b540

Scenario 4:

Add a Debug Json button so I can see the raw json, on 6 pages gated by a admin only flag. This cost 6 credits.

https://preview.redd.it/bofk449fsb2h1.png?width=563&format=png&auto=webp&s=ea888b49fa22f1aaeab2e4ea497791b60e9d652a

Outcome: All of the changes were completed exactly like I asked with zero fixes needed by me. The text on the Dashboard pages looks good and is technically correct. Small Example with some of the text it added:

https://preview.redd.it/3v168zb2ub2h1.png?width=1276&format=png&auto=webp&s=2ebe090bd7f921d9bd3e3f68b6f422ff75c42e28

My Perspective: These Credit costs seem very reasonable to me personally. It's made edits on multiple pages, it's calling and parsing the JSON, and it's checking Auth for the bug component. It generated contextual user level text for the analytic views with no input from me.

I am curious what others think? Everything seems fine to me?

What prompts are you doing that go nuts? I am not seeing that on my side. Friendly questions.

edit: fixed some formatting

reddit.com
u/Jmacduff — 1 day ago
▲ 15 r/lovable

How To Verify SEO Pre-Rendering from Lovable for old stack apps

Earlier this week Lovable released the big SEO / GEO update which included the TanStack update for all new apps.

For the existing "old stack" apps (React/Vite) they also announced automatic pre-rendering. Nothing for the user todo, it's suppose to be just working magickly like a SSR platform.

I was having a lot of trouble actually seeing this work in real time. I have a suite of SSR tools and none of them show the old pages as rendered... And then I figured it out!

How to Verify:

  1. Go into Google Search Console for your domain
  2. Find a page on the site, and do the Inspect URL actions
  3. Click on the Crawled page data (view tested page)

https://preview.redd.it/sibtpyt79d1h1.png?width=1424&format=png&auto=webp&s=b3712ae9f9bbcb3603cc48175a200d1b69a5788d

You will now see fully rendered content on the page, in other words SSR is working for the legacy apps.

After some more testing here is what's going on:

  •  Pre-rendered HTML on the classic Vite SPA stack is only served to verified bots
  •  Lovable uses multiple validation methods beyond just the User-Agent string to verify the bot

So lovable is using a very strict set of triggers for the Pre-rendering data. I am not able to trigger it myself but for Google, Bing and others they are getting the content.

According the public docs these are the bots they are supporting:

  • Search crawlers: Google, Bing
  • AI search crawlers: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini
  • Social preview bots: LinkedIn, Slack, Facebook, X/Twitter, WhatsApp

I suspect it's a bigger list but that's just what's in the doc. So there you go.. Pre-Rendering is on for Bots for the Older apps.

-Jeff

reddit.com
u/Jmacduff — 6 days ago