
u/Level_Access_5014

random shots, edited with luminar + InShot
M92
Messier 92 (aka: M92, NGC 6341) is a globular cluster in the constellation Hercules. It is one of the brighter globular clusters in the northern hemisphere. It is often overlooked because of its proximity to the even more spectacular Messier 13. M 92 was discovered by Johann Bode in 1777. Charles Messier rediscovered and cataloged it in 1781, along with eight other objects (M84-M91) which are all Virgo Cluster galaxies.
Located on the north edge of Hercules, this impressive globular cluster deserves more attention, but is outclassed by the Great Hercules cluster, M 13, to its southwest. M 92 is harder to locate than its more famous cousin, but it is still a splendid object, visible to the naked eye under very good conditions, and a showpiece for optics of every size. It is slightly fainter than M 13, and about 1/3 smaller. M 92 is about 26,000 light years away, just a little farther away than its brighter ‘neighbor’ M 13. Its true diameter is about 100 light years. Its luminosity is that of 150,000 Suns (60% that of M 13). M 92 is approaching us at 70 miles per second (250,000 miles per hour).
The stars of M 92 are exceptionally poor in iron and other elements heavier than hydrogen. This suggests that M 92 was formed before the gas and dust of our galaxy were enriched with heavy elements. Which makes M 92 exceptionally old, even for a globular cluster. M 92 is likely about 12 billion years old.
From Phoenix, AZ (19 May 26); Bortle +8 w/Dwarf3
394 images taken, 350 used; 60 each, gain 60, Astro Filter
Edited with Luminar Mobile and iPad
Just installed Luminar Neo — what to do first (my experience)
When I went through this myself and spent the first hour clicking around randomly so here's what I'd actually tell someone starting from zero
first thing — don't touch any photos yet. go to Settings and set up your catalog location. by default it dumps everything in a place you'll never find again, so pick a folder that makes sense to you before you import anything
then when you do import — use "Add without copying" if your photos are already organized on your drive. a lot of people accidentally create duplicates because they didn't realize Luminar can just reference files where they already are
after that honestly just spend 20 minutes in the Develop RAW tool on one photo. don't try to learn everything at once. just exposure, white balance, and one AI tool — maybe Structure AI or Enhance AI. get comfortable with those before touching sky replacement or any of the more complex stuff
also — if your photos look flat and washed out the moment you open them, that's normal. Luminar reads the actual RAW data, not the camera's processed preview. add your camera profile in the Develop section and it'll look way more like what you saw on the back of your camera
that's genuinely all you need for day one.
After/Before - Just starting out - would welcome feedback
I'm a very amateur (and somewhat lazy) photographer. I have been taking photographs for a few years but never really got to grips with post-processing. I find the subject is a bit overwhelming. Anyway, have decided to make more of an effort to learn how to use this properly, but its baby steps for me. So - this was taken on a Fuji xt30 with the XF 50-140mm lens (an unwieldy combination).
I'm more into landscape photography so this was a bit of a chance encounter and If I'd had more time I would have increased the shutter speed - but it is what it is. Granted, its not a particularly interesting photo, but I thought it would be quite a good one to practice post-production on.
I've cropped it ever so slightly (the sensor I have means further cropping is not really an option). I should have also rotated it slightly so the waterline in the background is horizonal.
I added a touch of sharpening. Altered the white balance to add some warmth. Increased overall the vibrancy. Reduced both the luminance and saturation of the greens and blues and added a vignette. I also tweaked the contrast slightly.
I have used Luminar Neo to carry edits, because that what I have access to. Its AI masking is not great, although that might be user error, so I haven't used any masking.
What are your thought - have a overdone anything - what would you do differently?
How to Achieve Cinematic Bokeh in Portrait Photography
This article actually has some useful stuff beyond the usual "use f/1.8" advice
the location bit hit home for me — shooting against a plain wall blurs but you never get those proper light orbs. you need small scattered light sources, streetlights through leaves, neon signs, that kind of thing. seems obvious but i kept wondering why my bokeh looked flat compared to other people's shots
also the section on shooting through foreground lights is something i never really thought about deliberately. same with backlighting — completely changes the mood
they also go into the Bokeh AI tool in Luminar Neo for when you didn't quite get it right in camera. looks more convincing than the lens blur stuff in photoshop from what i can see in the examples
How To Quickly Edit Photos In Luminar Neo
I thought it was worth sharing — covers exposure workflow, using presets as a starting point instead of from scratch, HSL for color, RelightAI, and a few other things that genuinely save time once you build them into a habit.
Nothing groundbreaking if you've been using the app for a while, but good to have it laid out clearly in one place. Useful for anyone who's still spending way too long on edits that should take ten minutes.
Skylum made a little game and honestly it's a great way to take a break from editing
No install, no signup, just open and play. Photo-related, won't spoil it. Drop your score in the comments, curious how everyone else does. I'm embarrassed by mine.
Skylum made a little game and honestly it's a great way to take a break from editing
https://luminar-game.skylum.com/ No install, no signup, just open and play. Photo-related, won't spoil it. Drop your score in the comments, curious how everyone else does. I'm embarrassed by mine.
Why do my RAW photos look washed out in Luminar Neo? (not a bug, here's what's actually happening)
If you've ever imported a RAW file and thought "wait, this looked way better on my camera screen" — you're not imagining it, and nothing is broken.
Here's the deal: your camera screen never actually shows you the real RAW data. What you see there is a processed JPEG preview that the camera generates automatically — boosted colors, sharpening, contrast, the works. It's basically a polished thumbnail baked into the file so you have something nice to look at while shooting.
Luminar Neo skips that entirely and shows you the actual raw sensor data as your starting point. Which is technically the "correct" thing to do — you get maximum editing flexibility — but yeah, it can look flat, desaturated, or just weirdly different compared to what you saw in camera or in something like Windows Photo Viewer.
The flicker you sometimes notice right after opening a file? That's Luminar briefly showing the embedded JPEG while it loads the full RAW data, then switching to its own interpretation. Totally normal.
Quick fix**:** go into the Develop RAW tool and apply your camera profile. That gets you back to something close to what the camera was showing you, and from there you edit as normal.
So if someone in your life opens Luminar for the first time and panics that all their photos "look wrong" — send them this. Happens to basically everyone at least once.
Luminar Neo 1.27.0 update stuck at 30% — here's what actually helped
Been seeing a few people hit the same wall with this update so figured I'd compile what's worked for others (and what worked for me after an hour of frustration).
Quick background: the update kept freezing around 30%, so I uninstalled completely and tried a fresh reinstall. Same thing. Eventually got it sorted after going through the list below.
Things worth trying, roughly in order:
Restart the app *and* your computer first — boring advice but it cleared it for at least a couple people in the thread
Turn off your VPN if you're running one — this was my fix, honestly didn't expect it but the download went straight through after
Switch your connection — if you're on WiFi try Ethernet, or even phone hotspot. Server routing can be weird sometimes
Temporarily disable your firewall or antivirus — they occasionally block the download mid-way without telling you
Windows users: try running Luminar Neo as Administrator before updating
If nothing works — just wait an hour and retry. There seem to be occasional server-side blips that sort themselves out
If you've genuinely tried all of that and it's still stuck, hit the Contact Form on the Skylum website and list everything you've already attempted. Makes it faster for their support to actually dig into your specific case rather than running you through the basics again.
Anyone else find something else that worked? Drop it below — would be useful to have everything in one place.
The Milky Way Core
The Milky Way Core, about 3am and 4am w/Dwarf3
Taken from Sedona, AZ; Bortle 5, 10s each, gain 0 (52 & 145 images used) Astro filter
Edited in Luminar Mobile and iPad; some star reduction
Steinpflanze in der Morgensonne [OC]
100 RAW-Aufnahmen im Fokus-Stacking (Luminar Neo) mit dem Sony FE 100 mm F2.8 Makro GM OSS an der A6700. Feedback erwünscht.
These are from a good while now but anyway I wanted to share some rare ones. These are from when I used iPhone as camera so I relied a lot in post processing.
Looking back they aren’t horrible to be fair but defintely overdone.
I’ll post some more recent ones.
For the ones asking I used: Photomator, Luminar Neo and the Labbet iPhone app (this one is an absolute gem) i think nothing more.