u/LinearAlgebraWorld

Visualizing cofactor expansion as signed volume decomposition
▲ 169 r/LinearAlgebra+1 crossposts

Visualizing cofactor expansion as signed volume decomposition

I made a visualization of cofactor expansion for a 3×3 determinant.

The idea is to start with the usual interpretation of det(A) as signed volume, then show each cofactor term as:

• one coordinate projection of the expansion column

• one projected 2×2 minor in the orthogonal coordinate plane

So instead of treating

det(A) = a₁₁M₁₁ − a₂₁M₂₁ + a₃₁M₃₁

as only a symbolic rule, the goal is to make the three terms look like signed volume pieces.

The image shows the three terms for one example matrix, including the “same sign / negated sign” behavior of the cofactor signs.

Full explanation, including determinant sign:

https://www.graphmath.com/la/determinant/determinant-sign.html

I would be interested in feedback on whether the geometric interpretation is clear

u/LinearAlgebraWorld — 2 days ago
▲ 10 r/LinearAlgebra+2 crossposts

Geometric meaning of Cramer’s rule for a 3×3 system

The image shows the denominator matrix A and the numerator matrices A1, A2 and A3 as parallelepipeds. In each numerator matrix, one column of A is replaced by b. The unchanged columns determine a shared reference face, so each ratio

x_k = det(A_k) / det(A)

can be viewed as a signed volume ratio.

In response to previous post, we received some useful suggestions. Hoping for the same this time

reddit.com
u/LinearAlgebraWorld — 19 days ago