
FSBO Sellers: Don’t Argue About the Buyer’s Broker Fee. Do the Math.
A FSBO seller client recently received an offer for their home. As part of the offer, the buyer asked the seller to cover the cost of the buyer's broker. My client was adamant that they did not want to pay the buyer’s broker.
I understood the reaction. If you are selling FSBO, a big part of the appeal is avoiding unnecessary costs. So when a buyer comes in and asks the seller to cover their broker's compensation, the knee-jerk reaction is to say no.
Here's another way to think about it.
The question to ask yourself is whether accommodating the buyer’s request still leaves you with an acceptable net result.
For example:
A buyer offers $400,000 and asks the seller to pay 2.5% toward the buyer’s broker.
That is a $10,000 cost.
As the seller, you can either accept it and treat it as a $10,000 reduction in proceeds or counter by increasing the purchase price by 2.5%.
In this example, increasing the price would leave you with about $400,000 before other costs. In other words, you get what you want (more money), and the buyer can finance their broker's commission (allowing them a little more financial flexibility).
That does not mean the buyer will accept it. It does not mean the appraisal will support it. It does not mean the lender will approve every structure. Real estate loves to throw curve balls.
But the point is this: don’t turn the buyer-broker fee into a symbolic fight if the math can solve the problem.
In a FSBO or private sale, the best offer is not always the highest purchase price. The best offer is the best net offer after broker compensation, credits, inspection issues, tax prorations, closing costs, financing risk, and timing are all considered.
A request to pay the buyer’s broker is not automatically good or bad.
It is just another deal term.