Malicious compliance? When "N95" isn't specific enough
Went to get some medical imaging recently, and requested the tech wear an N95 while in the room with me.
The appointment person checked with the tech and the tech said, if they can find one they will wear it. I said I could provide one. Appointment person says "they can only wear one that the facility provides, and not one touched by patients", when I mention the one I would provide is a factory sealed 3M Aura, they go "well N95s have to be fitted, they can't wear a random one". I point out that the policy doesn't make sense because they weren't going to wear one to begin with, so it can only help, not hurt. They said the tech would let us know by EOD if they *can't* find an N95.
Anyway on to the main issue-- I didn't get a call back, so I go to the appointment, and the tech did indeed find an N95 and kept it on the whole time from the waiting room until we finished. Yay!
BUT... it was valved.
I decided not to say anything since it was better than nothing and face-to-face interaction would be minimal, and I was in a KN100.
Couldn't help but think this was malicious compliance, but then again we all know that most people seem incapable of connecting dots these days "why was an N95 requested? does a valve still fit with that?" and maybe it was just "here's an N95 I found, criteria met"?
But as someone in another post mentioned, we now have to be VERY SPECIFIC: "UNVALVED N95 please".