
Former IOLERO (law enforcement oversight) director pulled no punches in his interview with The Press Democrat
Former Sonoma County IOLERO Director John Alden gives basically a tell-all about why he’s leaving, why civilian oversight of law enforcement isn’t working and whose to blame.
Some excerpts:
- Ongoing disputes between the Sheriff’s Office and oversight agency have held up IOLERO’s investigations of whistleblower complaints and critical incidents involving the Sheriff’s Office.
A potential California Supreme Court review of a yearslong legal fight between the two agencies is pending, and county officials have floated the possibility of making changes to Measure P.
- Alden: The Sonoma County oversight experience started in conflict and remains in conflict. Even before the (2013) death of Andy Lopez there was a tense relationship between many in the community and the Sheriff’s Office, around use of force and the way it patrolled the community and treated people in the jail. The death of Andy Lopez brought that forward in a very public way. When IOLERO started, it came from a place of the community really demanding an oversight system — demanding it of the county, demanding it of the board, demanding of the sheriff — and the Sheriff’s Office being deeply opposed, and that conflict has never truly resolved on a cultural level.
Cntd…
I think it’s hard for IOLERO directors to stay for long periods of time when there is this consistent conflict, and, certainly lately, we’ve had a board of supervisors that has not intervened in that conflict. They’re not providing support for IOLERO as a group. What they individually want to do, or what their intentions are, I couldn’t speak to that, but if you watch what we’ve seen publicly, there hasn’t been an outcry exactly, from the board about, say, the sheriff not making his people available for interviews, and that creates a challenge for IOLERO.
- Alden: Your paper’s coverage of the supervisor races in District 2 and 4 has pointed out that this has now become a significant issue for community. Are we going to be electing people who say Measure P is a strong priority or people who are going to say we should dial back on Measure P because it’s just not worth it? That’s a really stark contrast between those candidates, and that’s one way the voters get to make a decision about what kind of oversight they want. The next sheriff’s election (in 2028) might have some of those same themes.
Story link: https://www.pressdemocrat.com/2026/05/20/iolero-alden-sonoma-county-oversight/