Tech CEOs Suddenly Say AI Will Create Jobs, Not Destroy Them

Tech CEOs Suddenly Say AI Will Create Jobs, Not Destroy Them

Tech CEOs have sharply pivoted from warning about AI-driven job destruction to emphasizing productivity gains and employment growth — even as layoffs at their own companies continue, raising questions about whether the narrative shift reflects genuine economic change or strategic PR repositioning.

Key Details:

  • One year ago, leaders like Dario Amodei warned AI could eliminate half of entry-level jobs. Now the messaging has flipped: Sam Altman says the industry "underestimated how much we're going to be able to keep people at the center of everything." Amodei wrote a recent essay emphasizing he wasn't trying to be a "prophet of doom."
  • CEO surveys show sentiment has shifted sharply: EY-Parthenon found belief that AI investments will cause significant head count reductions fell from 46% (January 2025) to 20% (May 2026).
  • A Ramp/Revelio Labs study found companies making the largest AI investments grew employment roughly 10% more than similar companies that hadn't yet adopted AI.
  • The rhetoric about job creation is contradicted by parallel layoffs: Meta laid off 8,000 in May while Zuckerberg touted AI's job-creating potential. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy spoke of job creation in February after announcing the company would reduce head count; the company subsequently laid off 16,000.
  • Reality check: About 20% of U.S. leaders admit their AI deployment reports paint rosier pictures than facts support, with staff keeping quiet about failures.
  • Reasons for the narrative shift: labor market hasn't imploded as rapidly as predicted; economists recognize it's bad business to say your product will destroy the economy; political pressure around data centers and regulations.
  • Counterpoint: Ford CEO Jim Farley predicted AI would replace "half of all white-collar workers" last year but recently hired several hundred engineers due to quality concerns with automated work.

Why It Matters: The sudden optimism about AI jobs masks deeper uncertainty — companies still don't reliably understand which AI investments work, implementation takes longer than expected, and the gap between executive messaging and reported reality is widening. The shift may signal not genuine economic understanding but strategic repositioning ahead of continued spending and potential regulation.

u/Money-Ranger-6520 — 10 hours ago
▲ 165 r/Agent_AI+1 crossposts

Anyone else letting an AI run their book ads? sharing my numbers, they're not pretty

So about 6 weeks ago I did something probably stupid and gave an AI agent actual control of my amazon ads account. Not the "chatgpt give me keywords" thing, I mean it connects to the Ads API on a schedule, pulls the reports, changes bids, adds negatives, pauses stuff, and I dont approve anything. It just does it and leaves me a log.

Some background, I publish non fiction under a few pen names, around 10 titles. I was spending stupid amounts of time in the ads console for a catalog that barely pays for itself, and my day job is technical so I figured, why am I doing this manually every three days when I could make something do it for me.

The numbers so far, because thats what I'd want to see first: June closed with $682 in royalties and $757 in ad spend. So minus 75 bucks. Before anyone says it, yes I know, but I was losing more than that before AND doing all the work myself, so I'm counting it as progress. Sort of. One single book (legal niche) makes about two thirds of my royalties, the rest of the catalog is basicaly decoration at this point.

The setup for whoever cares, its Claude running every 3 days against the amazon ads api. It has a config file with hard limits it cant touch, monthly spend cap, max bid change per cycle, max new campaigns per week etc. Everything it does gets written to a changelog with the reasoning. I also plugged in a free keyword tool from github (kdp-scout) so it has actual search data instead of making keywords up, which llms love to do.

Now the fun part. Early june it found the winning keywords in my best campaign and decided to "scale" them by duplicating them into a new campaign with higher bids. The new campaign outbid the original in every auction. My own campaigns were fighting each other and I had almost two days of dead sales before I understood what happened. I literally paid amazon extra money to compete against myself.

After that incident it got a hard rule, before creating any keyword it has to pull everything thats already enabled and dedupe, and if it duplicates a winner the bid caps at 80% of the original. Funny thing is last week that rule stopped it twice from doing the same thing again. Its like watching an employee develop scar tissue.

Other stuff it learned the hard way, ignore the last 2 days of data before cutting anything because amazon attribution lags and creates fake losers. Search terms that are entire book titles get rejected as keywords (too long), you have to target the ASIN instead. And pruning beats creating, its best cycles were 4-5 surgical changes, its worst were 30 tiny bid adjustments that did nothing.

Also had it manage a new launch in a completely different niche and that was a disaster, 1 copy in three weeks of paid traffic. Now theres a gate, no new book gets a single dollar of ads without keyword volume and competitor data first. Expensive lesson but ok.

What I havent figured out and where I'd genuinely apreciate input from people who've been doing this longer:

The agent is decent at not wasting money but ads dont fix a listing that doesnt convert. I'm getting a ton of clicks from "law firm" type searches that never convert because my book clearly speaks to individual lawyers, and no bid adjustment fixes that. Thats a description problem.

KENP. how do you people attribute page reads to ad spend without losing your mind, every calculation I do gives me a different breakeven.

International is rough. US works, UK barely, germany and spain were pure bleed so the agent hibernated them on its own (that was actually a good call). Trying canada now.

And the big one, would you let something like this touch prices or metadata, or is that insane? Right now anything editorial is proposal only, I execute manually.

If anyone else has wired scripts or an agent to the ads api for books I'd love to compare notes, what guardrails you needed, what you'd never delegate, etc. Not selling anything and not naming my books, this isnt a promo. Just want to know if I'm early or just wrong.

TL;DR: AI agent runs my amazon ads autonomously since mid may. Broke my catalog once competing against itself, learned some rules, got me from losing money to almost breakeven (-$75 last month), killed a bad launch fast. Ads cant fix weak listings though and I'm stuck at a ceiling. Looking for others doing the same.

reddit.com
u/Money-Ranger-6520 — 1 day ago

Anthropic Redeploys Fable 5 After Export Controls Lifted

Anthropic is redeploying Claude Fable 5 starting July 1 after export controls were lifted, and in response to a reported jailbreak by Amazon researchers, announced a new industry framework for measuring AI jailbreak severity and deepened collaboration with the US government on frontier AI security.

Key Details:

  • Export controls were imposed June 12 after Amazon researchers discovered a technique to bypass Fable 5's safeguards — prompting it to identify software vulnerabilities and in one case produce code showing how to exploit one. Controls have now been lifted as of June 30.
  • Anthropic's testing found that many weaker models (Claude Opus 4.8, GPT-5.5, Kimi K2.7) identified the same vulnerabilities, and every model tested could produce the same exploitation code. The reported jailbreak did not expose unique Mythos-level capabilities — it was a "borderline case" for Fable 5's safeguards.
  • Fable 5 architecture uses "defense in depth" — multiple layered safeguards that work together rather than any single mechanism. Core defense: classifiers detect potentially harmful cybersecurity tasks and block responses. Anthropic deliberately set a wide "safety margin" for Fable 5, blocking many benign requests to reduce false negatives.
  • Severe jailbreaks (e.g., actively damaging critical infrastructure) will trigger immediate preliminary mitigations. Anthropic launching HackerOne program for researchers to submit discovered cyber jailbreaks.
  • Government collaboration: Pre-release access for designated partners; rapid information sharing on jailbreaks; dedicated Anthropic teams for joint research; contribution toward industry-wide security standards. Treasury, Commerce, NIST, and national security agencies involved.
  • Availability: Fable 5 available globally starting July 1 on Claude Platform, Claude.ai, Claude Code, Cowork. Included for up to 50% of weekly usage through July 7, then via usage credits. AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Foundry access being restored.

Why It Matters: The episode reveals how narrowly defined export controls can backfire — Amazon's research showed Fable 5 offers no unique offensive cyber capabilities over weaker models. By proposing an objective jailbreak severity framework with industry partners and deepening government collaboration, Anthropic is trying to prevent future disruptions while establishing a durable standard for releasing powerful AI models safely.

reddit.com
u/Money-Ranger-6520 — 4 days ago

Indian Tech Tycoon Launches Neo, a $30 Million AI-First Enterprise Platform

Indian entrepreneur Bhavin Turakhia is investing $30 million of his own capital into Neo, a new enterprise AI platform designed from scratch for the AI era rather than retrofitting existing workplace software.

Key Details:

  • Neo combines project management, documents, file storage, and AI into a single integrated platform, positioning AI as an active participant in daily work rather than a separate tool
  • The platform is model-agnostic, allowing enterprises to switch between different AI providers instead of being locked into one
  • Turakhia bootstrapped the venture because he believes AI represents a fundamental technology shift significant enough to justify rebuilding workplace software entirely
  • Neo launched internally in April 2026 and has been tested across Turakhia's companies, including banking software firm Zeta
  • The Bengaluru-based startup currently has 45 employees (18 engineers) and plans to expand to around 100 by year-end
  • The initial platform was built in three months using AI extensively in development, a process Turakhia estimates would have taken over a year with traditional methods
  • Neo plans to roll out to mid-sized businesses in the coming months, initially targeting knowledge workers in technology, consulting, and professional services

Why It Matters: Even capturing 2-5% of the global enterprise AI market would create a larger company than anything Turakhia has previously built, demonstrating the massive opportunity in enterprise AI despite intense competition from Microsoft, Google, Salesforce, and AI labs like Anthropic and OpenAI.

u/Money-Ranger-6520 — 4 days ago

AI Agents Can Now Pay for Tools Without API Keys. Here's How.

Apify brought 20,000+ web scraping and data tools into the x402 payment protocol, enabling AI agents to autonomously discover, price, and pay for data collection tools using USDC on Base — eliminating API key bottlenecks that previously required human workflow intervention.

Key Details:

  • The x402 protocol (originally built by Coinbase, now governed by Linux Foundation) lets servers declare a payment requirement at request time, which clients satisfy automatically through blockchain transactions. Pairs naturally with Model Context Protocol (MCP) for tool discovery.
  • Apify expanded x402-compatible endpoints from ~2,000 to 20,000+ by integrating its entire marketplace of Actors (web automation tools). Agents can now pay USDC on Base instead of requiring pre-provisioned API keys and human account management.
  • Two settlement schemes: exact (fixed cost per request, useful for APIs with known costs) and upto (allowance-based, for variable-cost operations like batch web scraping). The upto scheme signs a maximum allowance and charges only for actual usage.
  • Technical flow: Agent requests an Actor, server responds with HTTP 402 Payment Required, includes payment challenge with pricing terms, agent's wallet signs authorization, server verifies through x402 facilitator, Actor runs.
  • Coinbase Agentic Wallet CLI (npx awal) handles wallet setup, payment signing, and refunds automatically. Works with coding agents (Claude Code, OpenCode, Droid, etc.) that can execute shell commands.
  • Real-world use case: trading agents pull live sentiment from X/Reddit via Apify, combine with on-chain whale movements and price data from other x402-enabled services, build analysis dashboard — all without pre-provisioning each service's API credentials.
  • $1.00 buys: ~380 Instagram profiles, ~250 Google Maps places, ~165 Amazon products, ~330 TikTok videos, or ~2,500 X posts at no-account pricing.
  • Security note: Treat agent wallets like low-balance hot wallets. Compromised or hallucinating agents could drain the balance.

Why It Matters: x402 solves a fundamental friction point in agentic workflows — API key provisioning, account creation, and billing authentication. By letting agents autonomously pay for tools on-chain, Apify eliminates the human-in-the-loop approval bottleneck that previously capped how long and complex agents' autonomous tasks could be.

u/Money-Ranger-6520 — 5 days ago
▲ 1 r/FounderHelp+1 crossposts

More Programmers, Less Talent - What's happening here?

CEOs and CTOs say that recently the talent pool got bigger, but finding actual digital remote workers got harder. 

The market is flooded with developers who look qualified on paper but can’t deliver in production. While candidate pools grow larger, the portion that can actually architect solutions and solve complex problems keeps shrinking.

The result? A market flooded with software developers who can pass initial screenings but struggle with real-world complexity. Meanwhile, truly skilled engineers command premium rates and cherry-pick their projects.

Your job post might get 100 applications, but finding one who can architect solutions that scale? That’s the real challenge.

Do you think that AI is the culprit here? Something in this market is broken.

u/Money-Ranger-6520 — 5 days ago

Anthropic Launches Claude Science, an AI Workbench for Scientists

Claude Science is a new AI application that integrates fragmented research tools into a single environment, enabling scientists to conduct literature analysis, data processing, and manuscript preparation with full reproducibility and auditability.

Key Details:

  • Unified Research Environment: Consolidates dozens of databases, file formats, and tools (PubMed, Jupyter, R, cluster terminals) into one platform accessible on macOS, Linux, or remote machines via SSH or HPC login nodes.
  • Rich Scientific Artifacts: Generates publication-ready figures and manuscripts alongside executable code, with native rendering of 3D protein structures, genome tracks, and chemical structures. Every output includes full reproducibility documentation.
  • Intelligent Compute Management: Automatically handles large computational tasks (protein folding, genomics pipelines) by drafting plans, scaling resources from single GPU to hundreds as needed, and running on existing lab infrastructure without moving sensitive datasets.
  • Domain-Ready Capabilities: Includes over 60 pre-configured skills and connectors for genomics, single-cell analysis, proteomics, structural biology, and cheminformatics. Integrates with NVIDIA's BioNeMo toolkit and connects to major scientific databases (UniProt, PDB, Ensembl, ClinVar, ChEMBL, GEO).
  • Validation & Correction: Features a reviewer agent that checks citations, calculations, and figure accuracy, automatically flagging and correcting errors.
  • Beta Availability: Launched today for Claude Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise users. A $30,000 AI for Science grant program is open through July 15, 2026, supporting projects from September to December 2026.

Why It Matters:

Claude Science accelerates scientific discovery by eliminating tedious data management tasks and enabling researchers to focus on analysis and interpretation, with early users reporting dramatic time savings on complex workflows like literature reviews and genomic analysis.

u/Money-Ranger-6520 — 5 days ago

Vinton Cerf (The Father of the Internet) Steps Down as Google's Chief Internet Evangelist

Vinton Cerf, the 83-year-old co-architect of TCP/IP and the internet itself, is retiring from his role as Google's chief internet evangelist after more than 20 years with the company.

Key Details:

  • Cerf and Robert Kahn are credited with developing the networking protocols that became the foundation of the modern internet, work recognized with a Presidential Medal of Freedom and a Turing Award
  • He has served as vice president and chief internet evangelist at Google since 2005
  • At the Open Frontier conference, Cerf spoke on a panel about building durable open source projects alongside other computer scientists including Dave Patterson, François Chollet, and Matei Zaharia
  • Cerf predicted that the rise of AI agents will force tech companies back toward standardized protocols and formal interoperability standards, arguing that natural language communication between agents would be insufficient due to ambiguity
  • He emphasized the need for precision in agent-to-agent interaction, comparing unstructured communication to the "telephone game" where messages become distorted
  • Cerf is known for his distinctive wardrobe of three-piece suits and ties, which he adopted as a grad student in the 1970s to stand out

Why It Matters: As AI agents become more prevalent, Cerf's insights on standardization and interoperability suggest that the companies defining early AI protocols could gain significant influence over the emerging agentic economy, echoing the dynamics of early internet protocol development.

u/Money-Ranger-6520 — 6 days ago

Breaking: Google introduces Nano Banana 2 Lite and Gemini Omni Flash

  • Introducing Nano Banana 2 Lite: Our fastest, most cost-efficient image model in the Nano Banana family yet, built for high throughput, speed and scale. Nano Banana 2 Lite is available today in Google AI Studio**,** Gemini API and Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform**.** It is also rolling out today in Google consumer surfaces including AI Mode in Search, Gemini app and many other products**.**
  • Bringing Gemini Omni Flash to developers: Our high quality, cost-efficient model for video generation and conversational editing, now available in Google AI Studio**,** the Gemini API and Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform for the first time. Omni Flash is also available in the Gemini app and Google Flow.
u/Money-Ranger-6520 — 6 days ago
▲ 13 r/FounderHelp+1 crossposts

How are people handling SMTP/notifications in general?

There’s a few services I run that would benefit from being able to send emails. I thought I could just host a SMTP server myself but realized it was way too much hassle and I don’t want to deal with ip reputation.

Is the best way to do this just to use a 3rd party service? I’ve seen a few with generous free tiers with limits I probably would never reach. I was also thinking about trying Amazon SES but it seems overkill for what I need.

I was also thinking about setting up apprise and maybe gotify, but I dont know if this the way I should be doing it. It would be nice to get notifications sent to my devices instead of just email.

How are most people setting up their notifications? My main use case for this is for authelia one time passcodes and server alerts. I don’t know what the pipeline is to serve notifications and if this is secure enough to be handling my authentication stuff.

reddit.com
u/ColdFreezer — 6 days ago

How to safely give web-scraping AI agents write access to your Notion, Slack, or GitHub

Hey everyone,

If you’ve been building AI agents or working with web scrapers, you know the ultimate goal is getting the agent to do something with the data it finds—like posting a summary to Slack, creating a ticket in GitHub, or logging leads in Notion.

The massive roadblock has always been security. Giving a third-party, cloud-hosted scraping script (like web scraper) your raw API tokens or OAuth credentials is a massive security risk. If that script gets compromised, your entire workspace is exposed.

Apify recently released a pretty clever architectural fix for this using Anthropic’s Model Context Protocol (MCP).

How the security architecture actually works:

Instead of passing your API keys directly into the scraper's environment variables, they built an MCP Proxy Layer.

  1. Token Isolation: Your Slack/Notion/GitHub API credentials live strictly inside Apify’s secure platform infrastructure.
  2. The Proxy: When the scraping script finishes its job, it doesn't make a direct API call to Slack. Instead, it sends an MCP request to Apify's proxy.
  3. The Injection: The proxy verifies the request, injects the authorization header on the fly, and routes it safely to the third-party app.

The actual scraper code never touches or sees your secrets.

Because this is built on the open MCP standard, any LLM or agent architecture that supports MCP (like Claude Desktop or custom agent loops) can now natively use Apify’s library of web scrapers as standardized "tools," and then seamlessly push that data into your workspace without the usual webhook/auth headache.

Are you adopting MCP as your tool standard, or are you still relying on custom LangChain/LlamaIndex tool definitions?

u/Money-Ranger-6520 — 7 days ago
▲ 895 r/Agent_AI+1 crossposts

Anthropic embedded spyware in Claude Code — and attempted to hide it from you

tl;dr: Since version 2.1.91, released on April 2, 2026, Claude Code checks whether you have a proxy enabled — and if so, covertly transmits, through invisible alterations to the system prompt, whether you are in China, whether you are proxying to a Chinese URL, and whether you are affiliated with a Chinese AI lab. Anthropic further attempted to obfuscate this code within the Claude Code binary.


Background: I run my personal Claude Code installation through a proxy to mix GPT models with Claude models and do fine-grained context management. Today, with version 2.1.196, Anthropic disabled remote control when proxying is enabled. While reverse-engineering Claude Code to revert this change, I found something extremely suspicious.


The code

Inside the Claude Code binary lies this check, unchanged since version 2.1.91. The check does the following:

  • If you are using a proxy:
    • Check whether the system timezone matches Asia/Shanghai or Asia/Urumqi.
    • Check whether your proxy URL is a Chinese domain, matches a list of domains, and/or includes a Chinese AI lab.
  • Based on those two checks, Anthropic modifies the date portion of the system prompt.

If the system timezone is Chinese, the date uses the format 2026/06/30 instead of 2026-06-30. And depending on the proxy URL, the apostrophe in "Today**'**s date is" changes:

  • Is a Chinese domain and/or matches the domain whitelist, but is NOT an AI lab: \u2019, "right single quotation mark" — ’
  • Is NOT a Chinese domain and/or matches the domain whitelist, but IS a Chinese AI lab: \u02BC, "modifier letter apostrophe" — ʼ
  • Is a Chinese domain and/or matches the domain whitelist AND is a Chinese AI lab: \u02B9, "modifier letter prime" — ʹ

You can verify this yourself in the Claude Code source code. In version 2.1.196, the relevant functions are Crt(), Rrt(e), e0t(), Zup(), edp, and Vla. Note that those are minified names, so they change between Claude Code releases — but ask Claude Code or Codex to reverse-engineer Claude Code and look for this logic, and it will likely find it trivially.

The intent

Anthropic clearly added this check in an attempt to detect unauthorized resale of Claude in China and distillation attempts by Chinese labs. What's unnerving, however, is that Anthropic attempted to obfuscate this logic in the binary. Much of it is XOR-obfuscated with the key 91, likely to prevent it from showing up in a plain strings dump. Furthermore, the release notes for version 2.1.91 make absolutely no mention of this check.

Their intent is also clear in how they hide this with steganography in the system prompt, making small variations that are imperceptible to any user — and perhaps even to the model — but are easily detectable by Anthropic.

A fundamental violation of user trust

While this use case — attempting to detect unauthorized resale and distillation — is understandable, the fact that Anthropic covertly transmits information about your system and proxy settings without your knowledge or consent is a fundamental violation of user trust. Not only is surveilling every user in a timezone a fundamental overreach, but its very existence opens the door to a much more serious concern. If Anthropic is willing to secretly transmit information about your system simply because you're Chinese, what's stopping them from secretly steering the model to behave worse (which they attempted to do with Fable before researchers called them out) — or worse, maliciously?

Developers like me give Claude Code full filesystem and significant shell access so it can do its job. But this also means nothing is stopping Anthropic from exploiting it for full remote code execution on your system. Today it's a timezone check. Tomorrow, it could be system sabotage or data exfiltration.

Given the trust that developers place in Claude Code, I think it's important to call for more transparency from Anthropic. While IP protection is reasonable, it should not come at the cost of embedding what amounts to spyware on every developer's system.

I think it's also important to note that checks like this, while compromising the privacy of legitimate users, are also trivial to bypass for any moderately sophisticated adversary. So it's debatable whether this even achieves its intended purpose of preventing unauthorized resale or distillation while simultaneously violating the privacy of legitimate users.

reddit.com
u/LegitMichel777 — 7 days ago

South Korea Invests $1 Trillion in AI, Chips, and Humanoid Robots

South Korea is committing $1 trillion across three major initiatives to secure its position as a global leader in AI infrastructure, memory chip production, and physical robotics by 2028.

Key Details:

  • Memory Chip Production: Samsung and SK Hynix will invest $585 billion to build new chip fabrication plants in southwestern South Korea and the Seoul region, with the goal of doubling DRAM production within five years. However, construction timelines could extend 9+ years before full capacity is reached.
  • AI Data Centers: SK Group, GS Group, and Naver will invest $357 billion to construct large-scale AI data centers across multiple provinces, requiring significant electricity (14.3 gigawatts total) and water resources (650,000 tons).
  • Humanoid Robots: Hyundai Motor Company is committing $5.8 billion to manufacture Boston Dynamics' Atlas robots, targeting 30,000 units annually by 2028. The government aims to commercialize humanoid robots across 10 major industries and train 10,000 "AI robotics specialists."
  • Challenges: South Korea faces infrastructure demands (electricity and water), potential labor unrest (Hyundai's union approved strike measures over job protections), and public debate about chipmakers' AI-boom profits and wealth distribution.

Why It Matters:

South Korea is racing to capitalize on global AI demand while addressing supply chain vulnerabilities, though the initiatives face headwinds from labor concerns and resource constraints.

u/Money-Ranger-6520 — 7 days ago

If you're a senior AI engineer charging under $55/hr, you're below market

According to the latest Lemon.io rate stats, senior AI engineers range from $35 to $94/hr, median is $55. Strong Seniors range $50 to $105 with a median of $81 - tied with Blockchain and ML for the highest Strong Senior median of any stack.

The interesting part is the gap. $26/hr median jump between Senior and Strong Senior, which is wider than almost any other specialization. So if you can credibly position into that tier (deep specialization, production systems, scope beyond just coding), the ROI on positioning work is huge.

Also worth knowing: average contract length is 9+ months. AI work is tracking as embedded long-term engineering, not short consulting gigs. Price accordingly.

What are you all actually being offered right now? Curious if the people charging at the top end are doing anything specific in how they pitch.

reddit.com
u/Money-Ranger-6520 — 7 days ago

General Intuition Raises $320M to Train AI Agents on Video Games

General Intuition raised $320 million at a $2.3 billion valuation by betting that hundreds of millions of hours of video game footage — paired with the action labels of what players actually pressed and when — can train AI agents that transfer directly to real-world robots.

Key Details:

  • The startup, spun out from Medal (a video game clip-sharing platform), raised from Khosla Ventures, General Catalyst, Jeff Bezos, Eric Schmidt, and researchers from DeepMind and MIT. Total disclosed funding now stands at $454 million since launch last October.
  • Core innovation: Most competitors train on video alone, inferring actions from pixels. General Intuition extracts the embedded action data—exact button presses and timing—from Medal's hundreds of millions of uploaded gameplay hours, which CEO Pim de Witte argues gives the model richer understanding of causality and self versus environment.
  • The same model powers both a Fortnite agent (trained for 100+ hours of continuous play) and a quadrupedal robot navigating real-world environments. The robot needed only eight minutes of real-world teleoperation data to be fine-tuned, collected on city streets.
  • De Witte built a world model that generates environments frame-by-frame rather than using game engines, trained on gameplay patterns to understand physics: walls block movement, ladders enable climbing, shadows change as light moves.
  • The model works with any device controllable via game controller or keyboard-mouse interface (drones, vehicles, humanoids). De Witte says it's "not designed to be a document retrieval system—it's a large language model" for spatial reasoning.
  • Ethics guardrails: De Witte (who worked for Doctors Without Borders) refuses lethal autonomy but supports search-and-rescue use. He launched Nerve, a jobs marketplace letting gamers earn money labeling data or teleoperating robots—targeting Medal's user base, which faces AI-driven displacement.
  • Strategy mirrors Anthropic/OpenAI: provide the foundation model, not build applications. Early customers in gaming, simulation, and robotics will help build a data flywheel by providing diverse embodiment and real-world datasets.
  • The bet: gameplay data is a scalable shortcut to training agents versus expensive real-world data collection. Open question remains whether simulation-to-real transfer holds at production scale.

Why It Matters: If General Intuition's simulation-to-reality transfer works at scale, it solves a fundamental bottleneck in embodied AI — costly real-world data collection. The proprietary data moat from Medal (hundreds of millions of hours with action labels) makes Khosla's "generational company" thesis credible, but the company still needs to prove the transfer works beyond demos.

u/Money-Ranger-6520 — 8 days ago
▲ 117 r/Agent_AI

DeepSeek dropped a 1.6-trillion-parameter open model you can download today

V4-Pro is a 1.6T-parameter mixture-of-experts model with 49B active parameters per token, released under the MIT license and supporting a 1M-token context window.

Its DSpark speculative decoding module enables that full 1M-token inference using roughly 25% of the compute and just 10% of the KV cache required by the previous generation.

The Max variant also delivers frontier-level coding performance, scoring 93.5% on LiveCodeBench and 80.6% on SWE-Verified.

Link to Hugging Face: https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro-DSpark

u/Money-Ranger-6520 — 8 days ago
▲ 895 r/Agent_AI+1 crossposts

Why are all the Claude Code skill files I see online completely pointless?

Every skill file I come across looks like this:

“You are an expert full-stack developer with 20 years of experience in React, Node.js, and TypeScript. Always write clean, maintainable code.”

Claude already knows all of this. You’re not teaching it anything.

The whole point of a skill is to fix something Claude consistently gets wrong. Not to explain what a developer is.

And Claude gets a lot wrong. Stuff a real developer would never skip:

•	Performance is never considered upfront. No thought for render-blocking resources, what to inline, what to defer. You find out at Lighthouse time.  
•	Mobile layout is an afterthought. A real developer thinks responsive from line one.  
•	Nobody ever mentions CSP or a WAF before deploying something public. A senior dev would bring it up unprompted.  
•	Accessibility gets skipped entirely. Clickable divs instead of buttons, no focus management, ARIA slapped on at the end if at all.

These are the things skills should be fixing. Not reminding Claude that it’s a “world class engineer.”

Am I missing something? Are there actually good skill files out there? Because I can’t find them.

reddit.com
u/Money-Ranger-6520 — 8 days ago