
u/NihiloZero

Why do people often post screenshots of article titles instead just the article links?
Often they won’t post a link to the article at all, but even when they do I don’t understand their logic. At best it seems like more work for the OP, but often they provide no link at all and OP just editorializes a brief bit about the title or the presumed contents of the article. And then others upvote such posts! I don’t think this is just AI bots as it’s something that people have done for a long time – and I can’t understand the purpose even it it was bots.
This is something that I personally find annoying and frustrating -- both as a moderator and as someone who actually reads articles and doesn’t get all they need from screenshots of titles (or the opening paragraph). Why do people post, upvote, and engage with such content?
What gives? What is happening? What are the various reasons for people doing this?
Saudis tell European refiners they’ll get no crude next month
financialpost.comGreta Thunberg promotes the "Apples Against Apartheid" protest against blood tech.
Do Tech Billionaires Want the World to Burn? (Interview w/ Naomi Klein & Astra Taylor)
youtube.comGray whales are washing up dead on the West Coast.
scientificamerican.comOn the likelihood and related consequences of a “blue ocean event” in the Arctic Ocean...
Annoyed at being called an “anti-science doomer,” I decided to sort through and present some quotes from academic literature about the likelihood of a “blue ocean event” (BOE) wherein the Arctic Ocean becomes ice-free during the summer. Additionally, I conclude with quotes from scientific articles about the severe, diverse, and under-recognized consequences of that BOE happening.
Previously, a BOE had not been expected until mid-century because overly-optimistic climate change models didn’t have us projected to reach the +1.5C to +1.9C threshold of warming (required to trigger the event) until much later. Unfortunately… the dramatic acceleration of global warming over the past decade (capped off by the current “Supersized” “Godzilla” El Nino) means that we will reach and breach that threshold for Arctic melting much sooner than previously expected.
>> The first ice-free day in the Arctic Ocean could occur before 2030
&
>> To quantify the amount of warming that would cause the Arctic Ocean to become nearly ice free, we examine at which level of warming sea ice area drops below 1 × 106 km2. For the high-sensitivity observational estimate, we find that sea ice area in September drops below this threshold for about 1.7°C global warming. Considering the ensemble spread in sensitivities, we obtain a 95% confidence interval of 1.5°C to 1.9°C for the global warming at which September Arctic sea ice vanishes.
&
>> Global average temperatures are likely to continue at or near record levels in the next five years, with Arctic temperature anomalies expected to continue to be higher than the global mean, according to a new report from the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), produced by the UK’s Met Office.
&
>> For the second consecutive year, winter sea ice in the Arctic reached a level that matches the lowest peak observed since satellite monitoring began in 1979.
The impacts of a BOE include...
>> Overall, we find a median additional global warming of 0.43 °C (interquartile range: 0.39−0.46 °C) at a CO2 concentration of 400 ppm. Most of this response (55%) is caused by albedo changes, but lapse rate together with water vapour (30%) and cloud feedbacks (15%) also contribute significantly. While a decay of the ice sheets would occur on centennial to millennial time scales, the Arctic might become ice-free during summer within the 21st century.
&
>> This is equivalent to the effect of one trillion tons of CO2 emissions. These results suggest that the additional heating due to complete Arctic sea ice loss would hasten global warming by an estimated 25 years.
&
>> We present evidence that material from the sea ice was indeed present in the water column and that this mechanism appears to be important in maintaining active populations of planktonic protists through the polar night. Our upscaling exercise based on observed ridge formation rates suggests that such release of food particles can supply extra energy during the polar night to the pelagic food web in the entire Arctic Ocean. It follows from this that the predicted ice-free summers in the Arctic Ocean due to global warming, may have implications for the protist community at the base of the food web, because the winter food reservoir in the sea ice will be very much reduced if there is no sea ice to accumulate it during the most productive summer period.
&
>> Finally, we suggest that shifts in the phenology, distribution and biomass of sea ice primary production anticipated with declining seasonal sea ice will disrupt sympagic-pelagic-benthic coupling and consequently the structure and the functioning of the food web which is critical for Indigenous Peoples, commercial fisheries, and global biodiversity.
This collection of quotes (with links to to formal academic sources) represents the backbone of my broader general belief that ecological collapse (and therefore social & civilizational collapse) is likely within the next few years. Taken together, I believe that it paints a rather clear picture of what is shortly in store for the world. But, until that point, I hope this post can serve as a resource whenever related concerns about collapse are dismissed or denied as being alarmist or anti-science.
I do understand that the prognosis this post represents is grim. However... I am of the sort which believes that “the truth shall set you free,” and the prognosis is even more grim if people don’t widely understand the true nature and extent of the actual problems we are facing. You can’t fix a problem if you don’t recognize the problem. And if society doesn’t generally understand a problem... it will be more likely to obstruct any potential solution or proper response. Whether any viable solutions are possible or not... I think the truth affords people some dignity insofar as they don’t have to behave in ridiculous or counterproductive ways while the environment and society collapses around them.
Whether you intend to prevent the related ecological collapse, or if you’d rather just live more freely in these final years of human life on Earth... it is my hope that this document facilitates that.
What is enough? "Enough" is the most dangerous idea in economics.
youtube.comNuclear regulator prepares to abandon a decades-old radiation safety rule
npr.orgDolly Parton - World On Fire (From The 58th ACM Awards)
youtube.comUK's rarest bird of prey (Montagu's harriers) rears new chicks in secret location (UK) 24/Aug/2026
youtube.comGreenpeace Sends Scorched Earth Message To Burnham
youtube.com2,500 dead and rising: UN says DR Congo Ebola outbreak 'growing exponentially'
youtube.comWhy Egyptian farmers are growing crops under solar panels. The additional shade reduces evaporation and stress on the plants, all while generating clean electricity.
grist.orgThere are currently multiple oil spills in the Strait of Hormuz
youtube.comFriday Night Dance Party! (Collapse Style)
I think music can help us get through tough times. And so, in light of current events, before I am unable to share these wholesome tunes… I decided to make a playlist. Because I’m old (and fairly punk rock), I figured I might be able to present (in the comments section) some of you with a few jams that you haven’t ever heard before. Of course, I also encourage you to try and enlighten me (and the unwashed r/collapse masses) with relevant musical offerings that I maybe haven’t heard before.
Some of the tracks chosen may be controversial in any of several ways. Some are covers of more popular versions. Some are performed by unwholesome rock stars and rappers who use naughty words. Most were chosen more for the audio quality, but some were chosen for their video. The view counts on some of these tracks might be shamefully low. For the mentally weak among you, the eclecticism may be too much to bear. You’ve been warned.