u/No-Client277

Why many fans think douma is ass written and doesn't understand douma writing he clearly so well written and complex fans says akaza is more well written while akaza is like typical tragic shonen villain while douma is nearly almost seinen level villain by writing he has Very complex, ideology, psychology, overall dynamics (dynamics with kocho sister was better than akaza overall dynamic) , better parallels, has better themes (nihilism much better than tragedy) , has better dialogues than akaza, has more depth than akaza, has more complex seinen style backstory (close to akaza backstory but still better)

I've notice few things in demon slayer especially in kokushibo and douma.

Kokushibo is like griffith of demon slayer I know he didn't R any women but he betrayed hashira and his humanity to become stronger than his brother by accepting muzan offer just like griffith did both share pretty similar ambition like one wants to be strongest and and have own kingdom and one wants to be strongest and surpass his own brother.

Douma is like johan liebert of demon slayer why? Both are nihilist share almost same nihilism like they believe into nothingness at all both are manipulator both use thier appearance to deceive people (douma use his appearance more than johan btw) both are devil behind that fake good and kind persona both are very complex (johan is more complex than douma maybe)

So what you all thing about this?