What if before the vote, you get to make a global speech, for what botton would you advocate for?
Caveats (consider or not them in your response, as I think they make the question more interesting):
1 - Let's say that you choose on behalf of those who are close to you.
2 - At the time of the voting, everyone gets to read three different sets of rules: one framed in favor of Blue, one in favor of Red, and the last one neutral.
In this scenario, Blue seems like the obvious choice, but I cannot picture myself voting Blue when the time comes. I deeply see it as a "life gamble"—one that I would never make, even less so for those who are close to me.
I don't believe that, even with a global speech, we would have a 100% chance of more than 50% voting Blue, and I would not risk my life on that. In that position, I would advocate for the Red Button by the logic that it guarantees your safety without relying on anybody else.
If children are voting, or if a fixed percentage is going to vote Blue no matter what, then I would vote Blue. But otherwise, the idea of putting myself in danger because somebody decided to put themselves in danger unnecessarily is something I wouldn't do. I also don't think this is uncommon logic. (hence the reason for me choosing Red)