u/Ok-Veterinarian1586

CommandCode GOAT vs. OpenCode GO: A Current Comparison

CommandCode GOAT vs. OpenCode GO: A Current Comparison

GOAT Plan vs OpenCode Go — Common Models Comparison

Method: For each common model, we feed OpenCode Go's per-model token assumptions (input / cache-read / output per request) into both platforms' per-token pricing + monthly allowance, using CommandCode's calculator formula:

costPerRequest = (inTok/1e6) * inPrice + (outTok/1e6) * outPrice + (cacheTok/1e6) * cacheReadPrice
requests/month = monthlyAllowance / costPerRequest

This gives apples-to-apples request counts. All prices are per 1M tokens, USD, precise (no rounding).

Sources

Platform Pricing page Plan details Token assumptions Per-token rates & allowances
Command Code GOAT commandcode.ai/pricing docs/plans/goat docs/resources/pricing-limits#usage-estimates Same page -- per-model credit allowances + per-token rates
OpenCode Go opencode.ai/pricing docs/en/go (English) docs/en/go -- Usage limits Same page -- "prices per 1M tokens" table + "Usage" column

Calculator source

CommandCode's usage calculator is a client-side React component embedded in the pricing-limits page. The formula was extracted from the page's JavaScript bundle:

  • Source URL: https://commandcode.ai/docs/_next/static/chunks/app/resources/pricing-limits/page-6886473b13679efd.js
  • Local copy: [calculator-source.js](./calculator-source.js) in this directory
  • Formula (de-minified):// Default assumptions (overridden per-model on OpenCode's page) // { inputTokens: 800, outputTokens: 180, cacheReadTokens: 50000 } ​ // cost per single request function costPerRequest(modelPricing, tokAssumptions) {  return tokAssumptions.in / 1e6 * modelPricing.in +         tokAssumptions.out / 1e6 * modelPricing.out +         tokAssumptions.cache / 1e6 * modelPricing.cacheRead; } ​ // number of requests per month function requests(monthlyAllowance, modelPricing, tokAssumptions) {  const cpr = costPerRequest(modelPricing, tokAssumptions);  return cpr > 0 ? monthlyAllowance / cpr : 0; }

Replication script

The exact numbers in this comparison were generated with:

​

cd ~/workspace/models_comparison
node requests-calculation.js

Plan-Level Summary

Feature Command Code GOAT OpenCode Go
Price $10/mo + processing fee $10/mo ($5 first month)
Total monthly value $70 credits (7x multiplier) $60 usage (6x multiplier)
5-hour rolling limit $14 $12
Weekly rolling limit $35 $30
Monthly limit $70 $60
Beyond limits Buy pay-as-you-go credits (roll over, never expire) "Use balance" -- draw from ZEN balance, then pay-as-you-go
Deals / discounts Baked-in deals on MiMo (98-99%), MiniMax M3 (50%), Gemini 3.7 Flash (50%) No explicit deals; prices already reflect negotiated rates
Data retention 0-30 days (model-dependent) 0-30 days (model-dependent)
Cache read price Higher for some Qwen models & Grok 4.5 Lower for Grok 4.5, Qwen 3.6/3.7 Plus

Per-Model Comparison (16 Common Models)

Token assumptions for each model are taken from OpenCode Go's "Usage limits" section (English docs). These per-model assumptions -- not the calculator's generic defaults -- are used for both platforms to ensure a fair comparison.

Gap % = (|Go req - GOAT req| / max(Go req, GOAT req)) x 100. Shows the relative magnitude of the winner's advantage.

Model Go price (in/out/cache) GOAT price (in/out/cache) Go allow GOAT allow Go req/mo GOAT req/mo Gap % Winner
DeepSeek V4 Flash $0.22/$0.66/$0.007 $0.22/$0.66/$0.007 $15 $60 18,894 75,576 75.0% GOAT
DeepSeek V4 Pro $0.66/$1.98/$0.022 $0.66/$1.98/$0.022 $15 $20 5,221 6,961 25.0% GOAT
GLM-5.2 $1.40/$4.40/$0.26 $1.40/$4.40/$0.26 $60 $70 3,958 4,617 14.3% GOAT
GLM-5.3 $1.40/$4.40/$0.26 $1.40/$4.40/$0.26 $15 $20 989 1,319 25.0% GOAT
GPT-5.6 Luna $0.20/$1.20/$0.02 $0.20/$1.20/$0.02 $15 $20 10,246 13,661 25.0% GOAT
Grok 4.5 $2.00/$6.00/$0.30 $2.00/$6.00/$0.50 $15 $20 601 509 15.2% Go
Hy3 $0.14/$0.58/$0.035 $0.14/$0.58/$0.035 $60 $70 21,507 25,091 14.3% GOAT
Kimi K2.7 Code $0.95/$4.00/$0.19 $0.95/$4.00/$0.19 $60 $60 4,968 4,968 0.0% tie
Kimi K3 $3.00/$15.00/$0.30 $3.00/$15.00/$0.30 $15 $20 490 654 25.0% GOAT
MiMo V2.5 $0.14/$0.28/$0.0028 $0.14/$0.28/$0.0028 $60 $30 150,376 75,188 50.0% Go
MiMo V2.5 Pro $0.435/$0.87/$0.003625 $0.435/$0.87/$0.0036 $15 $20 16,291 21,772 25.2% GOAT
MiniMax M3 $0.30/$1.20/$0.06 $0.30/$1.20/$0.06 $60 $47 16,038 12,563 21.7% Go
Qwen 3.6 Plus $0.50/$3.00/$0.05 $0.50/$3.00/$0.10 $60 $33 16,349 5,061 69.0% Go
Qwen 3.7 Max $2.50/$7.50/$0.50 $2.50/$7.50/$0.50 $60 $33 1,688 928 45.0% Go
Qwen 3.7 Plus $0.40/$1.60/$0.04 $0.40/$1.60/$0.08 $60 $33 21,552 6,517 69.8% Go
Qwen 3.8 Max $2.00/$6.00/$0.25 $2.00/$6.00/$0.25 $15 $20 809 1,079 25.0% GOAT

Summary: GOAT wins 9 models, Go wins 6, 1 tie.

Key Takeaways

GOAT wins (9 models)

Mostly on premium models where GOAT's $20 allowance beats Go's $15, and on boosted models where GOAT negotiates bigger allowances:

  • DeepSeek V4 Flash: 4x allowance ($60 vs $15) -- 75% gap (75K vs 19K req)
  • GLM-5.2: boosted to $70 -- 14.3% gap (4.6K vs 4.0K)
  • Hy3: boosted to $70 -- 14.3% gap (25K vs 21.5K)
  • GPT-5.6 Luna, Kimi K3, Qwen 3.8 Max: $20 vs $15 -- ~25% gap
  • DeepSeek V4 Pro, MiMo V2.5 Pro: $20 vs $15 -- ~25% gap

Go wins (6 models)

Mostly on mid-tier / cheap models where Go's $60 allowance crushes GOAT's $33-$47, and on Grok 4.5 where Go's cheaper cache-read price ($0.30 vs $0.50) compounds:

  • Qwen 3.7 Plus / Qwen 3.6 Plus: Go's $60 + 2x cheaper cache reads -- ~70% gap
  • Qwen 3.7 Max: Go's $60 -- 45% gap (1.7K vs 928)
  • MiMo V2.5: Go's $60 vs GOAT's $30 -- 50% gap (150K vs 75K)
  • MiniMax M3: Go's $60 vs GOAT's $47 -- 21.7% gap
  • Grok 4.5: Go's $15 BUT 40% cheaper cache reads -- 15.2% gap (601 vs 509)

Tie

  • Kimi K2.7 Code: Identical pricing and $60 allowance on both -- exactly 4,968 requests, 0% gap

Cache-read price differences

GOAT charges more for cache reads on 3 of 16 common models:

Model Go cache-read/1M GOAT cache-read/1M Impact
Grok 4.5 $0.30 $0.50 Go wins despite lower allowance
Qwen 3.7 Plus $0.04 $0.08 2x more expensive on GOAT
Qwen 3.6 Plus $0.05 $0.10 2x more expensive on GOAT

Notes on Methodology

  • Token assumptions: Taken from OpenCode Go docs (English) -- different per model. Example: Grok 4.5 uses 1,100 input / 71,500 cached / 220 output per request; DeepSeek V4 Flash uses 410 input / 71,300 cached / 310 output per request. GOAT's own published estimates use different defaults (~800 input / 50,000 cached / ~125-200 output), which inflate their numbers for cache-heavy models.
  • Off-peak pricing: Both platforms show off-peak rates for DeepSeek V4 models. Peak hours (01:00-04:00 & 06:00-10:00 UTC) are 2x on both.
  • GPT-5.6 Luna context tiers: Go lists <=272K ($0.20/$1.20/$0.02) and >272K ($0.40/$1.80/$0.04). GOAT shows one price ($0.20/$1.20/$0.02). Both use <=272K tier here.
  • Processing fee: GOAT mentions "+ processing fee" but doesn't specify the amount. Go has no processing fee.
  • Model availability: GOAT includes Grok 4.6, Gemini 3.7 Flash, Muse Spark, Inkling, Step Flash, Nemotron 3 Ultra -- none on Go. Go includes GLM-5.1, Kimi K2.6, MiniMax M2.7 -- none on GOAT.
  • Allowance source (GOAT): Per-model monthly credit allowances from docs/plans/goat -- models with negotiated deals carry boosted allowances (e.g., GLM-5.2 $70, Hy3 $70, DeepSeek V4 Flash $60); new models start at 2x credits ($20 on the $10 GOAT plan).
  • Allowance source (Go): Per-model "Usage" column ($15 or $60) from docs/en/go -- Usage limits.
u/Ok-Veterinarian1586 — 3 days ago