u/Old-Finger-7140

In August 1966, two electronics technicians, Manoel Pereira da Cruz and Miguel José Viana, traveled from Campos dos Goytacazes to Vintém Hill near Niterói, Brazil.

They were found dead on the hill several days later, lying on their backs in suits and waterproof raincoats. Both had lead masks covering their eyes. There were no obvious injuries, and their belongings were still with them.

A small notebook found nearby contained a strange set of instructions. It mentioned arriving at a specific location at 16:30, taking capsules, protecting metals, and waiting for a “mask signal.”

No capsules were ever found.

The deaths were never explained. Toxicology testing at the time was limited, and much of the biological evidence was lost before more extensive testing could be done.

Over the years, the case became closely associated with UFOs and claims about spiritist experiments. Some of those stories are difficult to verify, while the notebook and the circumstances surrounding the deaths are much better documented.

The lead masks are what made the case famous, but the missing capsules may be one of the more important details.

In 1925, British explorer Percy Fawcett sent his last guides home and walked north into the Amazon with only his 21-year-old son Jack and Jack’s childhood friend, Raleigh Rimell. The three men were heading toward a region Fawcett believed might contain the lost city he had spent years searching for. None of them were ever seen again.

What makes Fawcett’s disappearance different from most vanished-explorer stories is that he had deliberately made himself difficult to follow. He kept his route secret because he was convinced that another explorer might reach the city before him and take the credit. He had already learned to distrust large expeditions. Too many people meant more supplies, more delays, and more chances for something to go wrong. So Fawcett went small. When he finally sent the remaining guides south, there was no larger party behind him to record where he went next.

That decision would matter enormously once he disappeared.

Search parties spent decades trying to reconstruct a route Fawcett had intentionally kept to himself. More than a hundred people are believed to have died during expeditions connected to the search. One of them was Albert de Winton, a minor B-movie actor who entered the jungle alone in 1933 after becoming fascinated by the mystery. He disappeared too.

Fawcett’s wife, Nina, refused for decades to believe her husband and son were dead. She wrote to strangers, consulted mediums, and followed reports that Percy was still alive somewhere in the Amazon.

In 1951, bones were produced as possible evidence that Fawcett had been killed. They were later rejected.

Almost nothing came back from the 1925 expedition.

Except Fawcett’s compass.

It still pointed north. It just never told anyone where he had gone.

In 1922, a married minister and his choir singer were found shot dead beneath a crabapple tree in New Brunswick, New Jersey.

They had been having an affair. Their love letters were found torn and scattered around the bodies. The scene appeared staged, and the investigation was badly handled from the start.

Four years later, the case returned to the headlines. The minister’s widow, her two brothers, and a cousin were accused of the murders. The prosecution’s key witness was Jane Gibson, a seriously ill farm worker who claimed she had seen several people arguing near the crime scene.

The newspapers called her the “Pig Woman,” and the trial became a major media spectacle.

All three defendants were acquitted. Nobody was ever convicted.

Much of the case has since been shaped by the affair, Gibson’s testimony, and the sensational coverage surrounding the trial. But the evidence itself was far less clear.

The murders remain unsolved nearly 104 years later.

Dorothy Arnold left her family’s house in New York on December 12, 1910. She told her mother she was going shopping for a dress for her sister’s debutante party.

She was 25, came from a very wealthy family, and had been trying to become a writer. That morning she bought a box of chocolates, walked to Brentano’s bookstore, bought a book, and ran into her friend Gladys King outside.

They talked for a few minutes. Dorothy said she was going to walk through Central Park and meet her mother for lunch at the Waldorf.

She never showed up.

What makes the case strange is how little there is after that. No confirmed sighting. No body. No luggage packed for a trip. No note saying she planned to leave. Her family even kept the disappearance quiet for weeks before finally going public.

There was also a secret relationship with George Griscom, a man her parents strongly disliked. They had secretly traveled together and exchanged letters. Later theories suggested everything from an accidental death to foul play, but none has ever been proven.

Her family spent a fortune looking for her.

115 years later, nobody can say with any certainty what happened after Dorothy walked away from that bookstore.

Betty Shanks was 22, walking home from night classes in Brisbane, four hundred metres from her own front door, when someone attacked her. Seven separate neighbors heard screaming that night and every one of them assumed it was kids messing around outside. Nobody checked. She died a few hundred metres from home.
There's a declassified ASIO file describing her as a person of interest during the Cold War, unrelated to the murder as far as anyone can tell, just a strange detail that stayed buried for decades. Six different men confessed to killing her over the following seventy years. All false, all ruled out. There's a discredited "mistaken identity" theory involving a doctor who took his own life 51 hours after her murder, DNA later cleared him. There's a locksmith who knew the family, spotted near the scene by one surviving witness who was shown his photo sixty years later and said the build looked "similar." That's the strongest lead police ever had.
Police ran modern DNA testing on her clothes a few years back. Got an unidentified profile. Doesn't match anyone on record. Doesn't clear anyone either.
Her watch stopped at 9:53pm that night. It's been sitting like that since 1952.
There's a $50,000 reward still on the table, seventy-four years later, completely unclaimed.
What would it actually take for a case this cold to finally break at this point, is it realistic that DNA databases eventually catch someone, or are cases like this just permanently stuck?

In December 1956, two sisters in Chicago, Barbara and her little sister Patricia, went to see Love Me Tender. Barbara was fifteen and had seen it eleven times already, not because it was good, just because Elvis was in it, which was apparently reason enough in 1956. They never made it home that night.

Their bodies turned up twenty-five days later, dumped beside a road so unremarkable that dozens of cars had probably driven right past them without noticing. Also, weirdly, the guy who found them thought he was looking at two mannequins someone had dumped. Went home, came back with his wife just to be sure. She fainted.

The official autopsy said they died from exposure. Just the cold, until their bodies gave out. No stabbing, no strangulation, nothing violent on paper.

The county's own chief investigator, a guy named Harry Glos, didn't buy it. He found puncture wounds nobody explained, ice sealed around the bodies suggesting they hadn't been lying there the whole time, restraint marks, evidence of sexual assault the official report had conveniently left out. He held a press conference in his own living room to say so.

Fired the next day. On live television. For insubordination.

There was a suspect too, a Skid Row dishwasher who vaguely resembled Elvis, held in a motel room for days until he signed a confession that fell apart the second anyone checked it against the actual autopsy. He walked.

Nobody's ever been charged. Glos died in 1994 still convinced he'd been right, and in 2025 his personal case files went up for auction. Over 500 cases worth. Nobody's said if there's anything new in the boxes.

In October 1983, German backpackers Andrea Scherpf, 23, and Bernd Göricke, 27, were hitchhiking through British Columbia when they accepted a ride from a stranger in an old Chevrolet pickup near Chetwynd. Both were shot. Their bodies were not found for three days and it took another ten days to identify them because they carried no identification.

The killer used their stolen traveler's checks at five gas stations over the next two days. Investigators traced the route but the trail ended at the last station. Whoever used the checks was never identified.

In 1991, Andy Rose was convicted largely on the testimony of a woman who claimed he had confessed to her. He was convicted again in 1994 based on the same testimony. Both convictions were later overturned. Before a third trial police used a controversial "Mr. Big" sting operation and Rose appeared to confess.

Then DNA testing changed everything. Bloodstains on a pair of jeans found near the scene excluded Rose as the source. The testing also revealed DNA from another unidentified person. More than two decades later that profile has never been matched.

So whose DNA was it? Could it belong to the real killer?

Elizabeth Short's 1947 murder in Los Angeles is one of the most covered unsolved cases in American history.

Her body was found cut in half in a vacant lot, drained of blood, with no trace of a struggle at the scene itself, meaning she'd been killed somewhere else and moved there deliberately.

For decades, one name has stuck harder than any other: Dr. George Hodel, a Los Angeles physician caught on a 1950 police wiretap saying, "Supposin' I did kill the Black Dahlia. They couldn't prove it now." He kept talking, mentioning his former secretary, dead of an overdose years earlier, and pointing out that she could no longer be questioned either.

His own son, a retired LAPD detective, spent years building a case against his father and eventually wrote a bestselling book naming him as the killer. The case rested on three things: the wiretap quote, handwriting he believed matched notes sent by the killer, and photographs he believed showed Short among his father's belongings.

What gets left out of most retellings: the DA's own chief investigator on the case wrote in his final report that the evidence "tend to eliminate this suspect." Independent handwriting experts hired separately by 48 Hours and the LAPD both said they weren't convinced the notes matched Hodel's writing. Photo analysts who compared the images concluded the woman in his album likely wasn't Short at all.

If the man most associated with this case for seventy-plus years was already cleared by the investigator who wiretapped him, why has that fact never caught up with the theory?

On October 24th, 1961, Joan Risch spent an ordinary morning in Lincoln, Massachusetts. She got her kids up. She ran errands. She was home by eleven. Neighbors described her as cheerful that day. Around 2 PM, a neighbor saw her walking briskly from her car to her garage. She was carrying something red with both arms.

Two hours later that same neighbor came back to drop off Joan's daughter. She found the kitchen covered in blood. A table and chairs were knocked over. The phone cord had been ripped from the wall. The receiver was sitting on top of a trash can outside. Joan's two-year-old son was crying alone upstairs. He was unharmed. Joan was gone.

The blood told a strange story once it was measured. About half a pint total. Not nearly enough to indicate a fatal wound. Someone had tried to clean part of it up using paper towels and, oddly, a pair of her toddler's overalls. Blood was smeared across the walls, the phone box, and a door frame. But there wasn't a single bloody footprint anywhere in the house. Whoever was there had been careful about where they stepped, even while apparently panicking about everything else.

Police found several bloody prints on the wall beside the phone. None matched anyone in the household. Over the following years more than five thousand people in the small town were fingerprinted and compared against them. Not one matched.

Bloodhounds traced a scent from the kitchen straight to Joan's own car. It was still parked in the driveway where she'd left it that morning. The trail stopped there. No one has ever explained why.

The case is most often remembered for a detail that surfaced two years later. Joan had checked out a string of library novels that summer about women leaving their lives behind. That's the detail everyone repeats. It doesn't explain the unmatched fingerprints. It doesn't explain the phone torn from the wall. It doesn't explain the missing footprints.

No suspect was ever charged. No body was ever found, even after sixty years of searching. Her husband never changed the phone number, in case she ever tried to call. He never remarried. He died in 2009, forty-eight years later, still not knowing what happened.

What explains a scene with that much blood, but not a single bloody footprint anywhere in the house?

In 1877 Harriet Staunton and her one-year-old son Thomas became victims of one of Victorian England’s most shocking cases.

Harriet had inherited £5,000 from her great-aunt and that money brought Louis Staunton into her life. He was younger than her and was already involved with another girl. After their marriage, Louis left Harriet and Thomas at Frith Cottage where they were placed in the care of his brother Patrick and Patrick’s wife Elizabeth.

The room where Harriet and Thomas lived was barely fit for anyone. There were no curtains, little furniture, and no proper facilities. When Harriet tried to leave she was stopped. When her mother came to see her, she was turned away.

Thomas was taken to Guy’s Hospital under a false name and died there the same day from malnutrition. Harriet followed five days later.

The case became one of the most talked about trials of the time. Four people were convicted and sentenced to death, but questions about the medical evidence later changed the outcome.

Almost 150 years later, people still debate parts of the case. But Thomas is often the person forgotten a one-year-old child whose death revealed what was happening inside Frith Cottage.

April 1876, London. He begins crying out for hot water in the middle of the night. Five doctors examine him, including the Queen's own physician. All agree: antimony poisoning, enough to kill him outright. He's lucid almost the whole time. He knows he's dying.

He had three days to say what happened. He never did no accusation, no explanation.

Charles had married Florence just a few months earlier. She was a wealthy widow who, unusually for the time, controlled her own money, something that became a source of constant tension between them. Living in the house too was Jane Cox, Florence's longtime companion, who Charles had just started talking about letting go.

Cox first claimed Charles admitted taking the poison himself. Later, under questioning, she changed her story. Charles had denied making any such confession before he lost consciousness that first night.

A jury ruled it willful murder. They never named a suspect. Nobody was ever arrested or charged.

By the time anyone thought to test the wine bottles or his water glass, they'd already been washed out.

Louis Le Prince is widely considered to have built a motion-picture camera years before Edison. He filmed his own family walking through a garden in 1888, in what's generally considered the earliest surviving motion picture.

In 1890, he boarded a train in France to show the world what he'd built. He never arrived in Paris. Six foot four, hard to miss, and not one passenger ever remembered seeing him.

Most people jump straight to Edison. And honestly, the timing is why the theory survives. Edison filed his own camera patent weeks after Louis vanished. But there's zero evidence tying him to anything that happened in France.

As far as the record goes, the last person to see Louis alive was his own brother. Every detail about that goodbye comes from him and nobody else.

Louis's son Adolphe spent years trying to get his father recognized as the real inventor. He finally won part of that fight in court in 1898. Three years later, he was found dead near the family's cottage, a gun beside him. Officially, it was ruled a suicide. His mother never believed it.

The earliest surviving motion picture is just Adolphe as a teenager, walking in circles around his grandparents in a garden. Not twenty-nine yet. Not dead yet. Just walking.

The neighbor noticed the mail first.

Lorenz Schlittenbauer had been watching the Gruber farm for days. No smoke from the chimney. No movement in the yard. Four days after he'd last seen anyone there, he walked over with two other men to check.

Six bodies. The family, their new maid on her first day of work, a two-year-old in his cot. All killed with a mattock, a farming tool shaped like a pickaxe, sometime during the night of March 31, 1922.

Before it happened, Andreas Gruber had already found strange footprints in the snow leading toward the farm, with none leading back out. He'd heard unexplained noises from the attic more than once. A newspaper nobody in the house subscribed to turned up on the step. He told his neighbors about all of it. He never called the police.

What nobody expected was what came after.

The killer didn't run. Investigators believe he stayed for days. The livestock got fed. Food went missing from the kitchen. Someone tore a page off the wall calendar the next morning, the same way the family always did it, like the day was just starting like any other.

Whoever this was wasn't panicking. He was living there.

Over a hundred people were questioned. Neighbors, relatives, a man once engaged to the eldest daughter. Every lead went cold. A hundred and three years later, the mattock is still the only thing anyone's sure of.

Which detail sticks with you most the footprints, the attic noises, or the killer staying behind? And if you had to pick a theory, which one actually holds up for you?

Someone trimmed this boy's fingernails not long before he died. Neatly. The kind of thing you do without thinking for a child you're caring for.

Then somebody broke nearly every bone a beating could break and left him in a box meant for a bassinet.

Nobody claimed him. No name, no family. Strangers started leaving toys at his grave anyway, decades before anyone even knew who he was.

It took 65 years and a DNA breakthrough to finally give him one.

Nobody has ever been charged.

At 7:06 PM, October 21st, 1978, a 20-year-old pilot named Frederick Valentich radioed air traffic control over Bass Strait, Australia, asking if there was any known traffic near him.

There wasn't supposed to be. He said he could see one anyway, close enough to make out bright lights and a metallic surface. It seemed to be playing some kind of game with him, he said. Then it started circling. Then his engine began running rough.

Asked to identify what he was looking at, he gave the answer that's outlived him for almost fifty years now: "It's not an aircraft."

Seventeen seconds of unexplained sound followed. Then the radio went silent. No wreckage or body was ever found. Years later, an engine cowl flap washed ashore, but it was never conclusively linked to Valentich's aircraft.

The case remains officially unexplained. What do you think Frederick Valentich actually saw?

On March 4th, 1918, the USS Cyclops left Barbados with 309 men aboard, running on one engine, headed for Baltimore. Her last message said the weather was fair and all was well.

No distress signal ever came. No wreckage. No bodies. Not a life preserver, not a plank, nothing that had once been the largest ship the US Navy had ever sent to sea.

A storm hit the Virginia Capes six days later, right around where she should've been.

There's a theory for what physically happened to the ship. There isn't one for why almost nothing from a 542-foot vessel and 309 men ever turned up, not even wreckage that storms like that usually leave behind.

Do you think this was simply a tragic accident, or is there still something we're missing?

November 24th, 1971 A man calling himself Dan Cooper bought a one-way ticket from Portland to Seattle.

Paid cash. Ordered a bourbon and soda once they were airborne. Nothing about him stood out—mid-40s, dark suit, black tie. The kind of guy you'd forget five minutes later.

Then he passed a note to a flight attendant. She slipped it into her purse without reading it, figuring he was just another businessman giving her his phone number.

He leaned over and told her to read it.

There was a bomb in his briefcase.

The note demanded $200,000 in cash and four parachutes. When the plane landed in Seattle, the airline actually paid the ransom. Passengers got off. Cooper stayed on with a skeleton crew and ordered the plane back into the air, heading toward Mexico.

Somewhere over the dense forests of southwest Washington, he lowered the plane's rear stairs.

Then he jumped.

Into the rain. Into the dark. Wearing a suit and loafers, with a bag of cash strapped to him.

Nobody ever saw him again.

The FBI worked the case for 45 years and interviewed more than a thousand suspects. In 1980, a boy digging along a riverbank found $5,800 of the ransom money—rotted, still held together by decaying rubber bands, partially buried in the sand.

That's the only confirmed trace of Cooper ever recovered.

More than 50 years later, nobody knows whether he survived the jump.

In 1969 a killer sent a cipher to three San Francisco newspapers simultaneously. Publish this or I'll go on a killing rampage this weekend.

The newspapers published it.

The FBI couldn't crack it. Naval Intelligence couldn't crack it. A schoolteacher and his wife solved it in eight days at their kitchen table. The decoded message boasted about killing. Talked about collecting slaves in the afterlife. Misspelled paradise as "paradice" the same misspelling appeared in every letter he ever sent.

He sent three more ciphers after that.

One took fifty one years to crack. When researchers finally decoded it in 2020 it contained no name, no location, nothing that helped identify him. Solving it told investigators what he was thinking. Not who he was.

One cipher is thirty two characters possibly directions to something that's been sitting in the Bay Area since 1970. Nobody has gone to find it because nobody has finished reading the map.

And then there's Z13. Thirteen symbols. Preceded by three handwritten words: MY NAME IS —

The FBI has had it since April 1970. Fifty six years.

Do you think his name is actually in there or was Z13 always just another taunt?

A neighbor noticed something was wrong because the chickens hadn't been let out.

That's how the Moore family murders were discovered on the morning of June 10th, 1912. Eight people — Josiah and Sarah Moore, their four children, and two young girls who had been invited to stay the night — all bludgeoned in their sleep with the blunt end of an axe. The axe had been swung hard enough to gouge the ceiling on the upswing.

Every face was covered with bedclothes afterward. Every window blocked with clothing so nobody could see in.

The killer also apparently ate something. A slab of bacon and a plate of food were found on the floor near where two of the victims slept. Nobody ever explained that.

Three suspects over ten years and none of them stuck. A state senator with motive whose alibi held. A traveling minister who was left-handed, confessed multiple times, and was acquitted twice. And a theory from 2017 linking Villisca to dozens of similar axe murders across the Midwest — same covered faces, same railway towns, same pattern. One suspect. A German immigrant named Paul Mueller. Never caught. Just gone.

The detail I can't get past is the covered faces. That's not concealment. It's something else. A compulsion maybe. A gesture toward the dead from someone who had just killed them.

The Moore house still stands. You can book an overnight stay in the rooms where it happened. People do.

What's your read local killer or Mueller's wider pattern?