u/Old_Rabbit_6302

I wanted to build a tool for people trying to break into FP&A. A month later I think I might give up on the idea.

Context: I left my finance job in January. Three and a half years - Big Four, then FP&A for a big retail group. MSc in Finance. And in interviews I still froze on "tell me about a forecast you built," because everything I'd done belonged to my employer and none of it was mine to show.

So I built what I wished existed. A realistic month-end close - messy variances, a stakeholder inbox where one person is "confidently wrong", numbers that actually reconcile to the cent. You do the analysis, write the commentary you'd send a CFO, and get it scored honestly against a published rubric.

It took a month. I don't have a job, so it cost me the only thing I've got, which is time.

Then: 275 visitors. Zero submissions. Zero emails. Zero feedback of any kind. Not even someone telling me it was bad. On a free case 😆

I've spent weeks trying to work out which of these it is:

* nobody can find it - a distribution problem, fixable;
* people won't spend 90 minutes on unpaid practice - a motivation problem and I probably can't fix that;
* or it isn't a real problem at all in the market and I invented it out of my own bad interviews.

So I'd rather ask than keep guessing.

**When you were trying to get into FP&A or a first analyst seat - did you ever practise on anything real?** Not courses or Excel tutorials, but something where you had to reach a conclusion and someone told you it was wrong, and why.

Honest answers welcome, including "this isn't a problem, you built something nobody needs." 😆

reddit.com
u/Old_Rabbit_6302 — 5 days ago
▲ 8 r/FPandA

The grading rubric I use to score FP&A commentary. Tell me where the weights are wrong.

Nobody ever explained to me what good commentary actually is. You usually find out when someone senior sighs at yours 😄 So I wrote down the weights:

- Root cause 30%. What drove the variance, not that it moved;
- Connections 25%. One operational story, not five unrelated notes;
- Judgment and evidence 20%. Claims you can prove, and saying so when you can't;
- Timing and forecast 15%. Recurring vs one-off vs timing;
- Communication 10%.

Communication at 10% is the one I expect "angry" comments for. But fluent commentary that names no cause is the most common failure I've seen, and weighting the writing higher just rewards it.

What would you change?

reddit.com
u/Old_Rabbit_6302 — 22 days ago