Will small satellites eventually become standardized platforms?

One thing that keeps coming up in discussions here is the idea of a generic bus that can take different payloads without redesigning half the spacecraft every time.

If launch keeps getting cheaper and hosted payloads become more common, could small satellites move in that direction? Somethin closer to a standard platform where the customer mainly brings the sensor or mission, while power, comms, flight software and the rest are already proven.

It sounds like it could cut cost and development time a lot, but maybe missions are still too different for that to work beyond a certain point.

For people working with smallsats, how close are we to this already?

No AI image this time...

reddit.com
u/OrbitalCommons — 9 days ago
▲ 14 r/amateursatellites+1 crossposts

Where is the real value in a small satellite company?

Smaller space companies seem to have the same choice. Build and own the satellite infrastructure, buy access to data from others, or build a service on top of existing data.

If several companies can buy access to the same satellite data, the data itself may not be much of an advantage. At the same time, owning satellites is expensive and do not automatically mean you have a good business.

Maybe the real value is in finding a specific problem and turning different data sources into somethin useful for the customer. Instead of just selling an image, maybe you sell an alert, a conclusion or some kind of decision support based on imagery, AIS, RF, weather or other data.

For people working in this field, where do you think the strongest long-term advantage is? Hardware, exclusive data, analysis, customer relationships, or some combination of these?

u/OrbitalCommons — 16 days ago

Hosted payloads underrated for smaller space companies???

I've been reading more about hosted payloads lately.

For a smaller space company it seems like an interesting middle step between only buying data from others and spending a lot of money building and launching your own satellite.

You could build your own sensor or payload, keep control of the data, but use someone else’s satellite platform, launch and ground infrastructure.

It sounds like a good way to test if the payload and business model actually work before going much bigger.

But I'm sure there are disadvantages too. Dependency on the satellite operator, less control over orbit and mission planning, integration limits etc.

For people who have worked with this: when does a hosted payload make sense, and when is it better to build your own satellite?

u/OrbitalCommons — 23 days ago
▲ 1 r/space2030+1 crossposts

Do smaller space companies really need to own their satellites?

Have been reading more about hosted payloads, rideshare launches and companies buying satellite data instead of owning a full constellation.

Makes me wonder if a new space company should start with the data or service first, find out what customers actually need, and only later build its own payload or satellite.

That seems like a much lower risk way to start.

But maybe there are disadvantages I am missing. Does not owning the satellite create too much dependency on other companies?

Curious what people here think.

u/OrbitalCommons — 24 days ago