Is this a valid critique of the pro-choice position?
So here's the thing, when people defend abortion, they do so using the argument of bodily autonomy...
Here's the definition of bodily autonomy I found on google:
"The fundamental human right to make all decisions about your own body, health, and future without coercion, violence, or interference from others"
So basically, if a woman wants to keep a baby, it should be her choice... Cuz after all it's her body which is supporting the foetus... Which is, fair enough...
But then, can't this argument also be used to justify child neglect?
Like, does taking care of a child involve a parent using their body? Yes (like the mother breastfeeding, or even something as basic as the mother or father carrying the baby)... Then, why can't a parent just say that it's their bodily autonomy that they DON'T want to carry the baby, feed it, etc?
LOGICAL ANSWERS ONLY, PLEASE...
Ps, I'm pro-choice myself... But I want answers to this point...