Mayo Clinic vs. OHSU
I’m 67, 5 months post-RALP, PSA 0.35 9 weeks after surgery. Because of the high PSA, I had a PSMA PET scan in May. Here’s the summary:
There are 2 directly adjacent left perirectal/distal internal iliac chain mildly tracer avid lymph nodes measuring 5 mm and 4 mm, concerning for early, developing nodal metastases.
Additional mildly tracer avid 5 mm left pelvic sidewall lymph node further cranial, concerning for additional early, developing nodal metastasis.
Faintly tracer avid tiny right presacral/external iliac and further anterior right external iliac lymph nodes, as described, nonspecific given tiny size and faint tracer uptake, however additional early, developing nodal metastases are a consideration versus reactive/inflammatory lymph nodes. These are not as definitive as the contralateral lymph nodes described above.
No additional site concerning for tracer avid nodal or distant metastatic disease.
I’ve been taking with the Mayo Clinic and OHSU in Portland (close to home) regarding radiation therapy. OHSU wan to do 32 daily treatments using EBRT with IMRT using protons. Mayo would do 25 daily treatments using the same machine except with X-Rays. They said that the xrays have better image guidance and less potential for rectal bleeding.
I would like to know if any of you have experience with either type of procedure and your thoughts about which one might be best for my situation.
I will also be on ADT at the time of the treatments.