What does your Azure infrastructure review process look like before merging IaC into production?
I’m asking because I’m building a product in this space and trying to understand the real workflows.
In most teams I’ve seen, the context is scattered:
- PR has ARM/Bicep
- Azure has live state
- cost impact is separate
- diagrams and internal wikis are stale
- security/best-practice checks are elsewhere
So approvals often happen with incomplete context.. the entire tool ing feels fragmented to me.
For people working with Azure infra, do you prefer these review to happen in:
- Browser/dashboard (like Azure Advisor)
- CLI
- GitHub Actions / Azure DevOps
- AI agent / chat workflow (in your favourite AI Coding agent? 😄)
>Also, what would make you trust or reject an AI-generated infra findings grounded in real signals and data? would you find that useful?
u/Prateeksingh1590 — 12 days ago