Does the impact of publications ever taper off at some point?
Over the past year, I've worked at a very productive clinical lab that is quite liberal with authorship (any contribution gets you authorship) and has a surplus of projects, allowing undergrads to even lead some projects. I've been able to get 2 first-author papers and ~10 co-author papers, all published at well-respected journals, definitely not predatory.
I also have a middle-author paper under a biology wet-lab.
I understand the cycle of clinical papers is much shorter than wet-lab papers and therefore are less impactful to adcoms. I was wondering whether the impact of having getting publications ever tapers off in the eyes of the admissions committee.