How is running agentic coding tools changing the way your team actually works?

Agents are writing code, reviewing PRs, running in parallel, opening pull requests semi-autonomously and I'm researching how that's changing team-level engineering, not just individual speed.

Specifically: what happens to code review when AI both writes and reviews it, how teams govern shared agent config, whether roles blur, and whether anyone's actually measuring if it helps.

Purpose: Master's thesis at TUM (Software Engineering & AI). Anonymous, no PII, never monetized, academic use only. I'll share the aggregated findings back here when it's done.

If you're building or working with agents in a team, ~10 min of your input would be gold.

Genuinely curious what people are seeing - happy to get into it in the comments.

reddit.com
u/Public-Bug5668 — 2 days ago

How are agentic AI coding tools changing the way dev teams work? (MSc research survey)

I'm researching how agentic AI coding tools (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, autonomous agents, etc.) are changing team-level software engineering - code review, code ownership, governance and how coordination shifts when AI both writes and reviews code.

Purpose: This is for my master's thesis at TUM (Chair of Software Engineering & AI). The goal is to understand how teams actually adopt and govern these tools - beyond the individual-productivity hype.

Data & privacy: The survey is completely anonymous, collects no personally identifiable information, and the data is used solely for academic research - never monetized or sold.

Giving back: I'll share the aggregated results and key findings back here in this community once the analysis is done.

If you work in a dev team using these tools, ~10 minutes of your input would genuinely help:
https://survey.seai.cit.tum.de/123456?lang=en&newtest=Y

Happy to discuss any of this in the comments.

reddit.com
u/Public-Bug5668 — 2 days ago

Is agentic AI changing team engineering practices faster than we can govern them?

Seeing a pattern where AI writes the code and reviews it, shared config files (CLAUDE.md, .cursorrules) appear ad-hoc with no clear owner, and nobody's really measuring whether any of it helps beyond "feels faster."

For those working in teams with these tools:

  • Has code review shifted from understanding the code toward just catching bugs?
  • Do you have shared AI governance/config, or does everyone configure their own?
  • Are role boundaries blurring (managers coding, devs doing product/QA)?

Trying to understand how widespread this is. (Doing MSc research on it - will share findings.)

reddit.com
u/Public-Bug5668 — 2 days ago