u/Responsible_Oil_9673

Discussion today on if we need a new physics of living systems & consciousness

Discussion today on if we need a new physics of living systems & consciousness

There is a dialogue today with Dr. Anita Goel & Bernardo Kastrup on why 20th-century physics frameworks, built primarily for closed systems, may need to be revisited to come to terms with life and consciousness.

Dr. Anita Goel, MD, PhD, is a physicist, physician-scientist, inventor, and deep tech pioneer in the field of nanobiophysics. As Founder, Chairman, CEO, and Scientific Director of the Nanobiosym Research Institute and Incubator, she is advancing new theoretical frameworks and experimental methods for elucidating the physics of life and living systems.

Inspired by Erwin Schrödinger’s What Is Life?, Dr. Goel’s research is driven by a fundamental question: What physical principles distinguish inert matter from systems that self-organize, process information, and exhibit life, intelligence, sentience, or some combination thereof?

Using DNA-processing molecular nanomachines as experimentally tractable information-processing systems, Dr. Goel studies how living matter reads and writes information at the single-molecule level. Her research spans a continuum from nanobiophysics to quantum-scale phenomena. She examines how mechanical forces, electromagnetic fields, and potentially non-trivial quantum effects shape molecular dynamics.

As the Chairman and CEO of Nanobiosym Diagnostics (NBSDx), Dr. Goel is commercializing some of her nanophysics and digital diagnostics innovations.

In this dialogue with Bernardo we'll invite discussion on:

  • Open systems, why 20th-century physics frameworks, built primarily for closed systems, may need to be revisited to come to terms with life and consciousness 
  • The need for experimental proof - the biological equivalent of a "double-slit experiment" her research programme probing living systems at the nanoscale and a roadmap to detect non-trivial quantum effects in the machinery of life

Named one of the World’s “Top Science and Technology Innovators” by MIT Technology Review and one of the “World’s Most Influential Visionaries in Biotech” by Scientific American, Dr. Goel has collaborated very closely with multiple Nobel Prize winners in her bold foray into the uncharted waters between physics and biology.

She has been recognized globally by prestigious honors including 3 DARPA Breakthrough Awards, 2 USAID Grand Challenge Awards, NASA’s Galactic Challenge Award (with Elon Musk’s SpaceX), the first-ever XPRIZE awarded in healthcare, and multiple awards from the DOD, DOE, AFOSR, NSF, DHHS, and FDA. Dr. Goel is the inventor on multiple patents worldwide and has published in leading scientific journals like Nature Nanotechnology , Scientific American, and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Additionally, Dr. Goel has been featured in 2 films: i) “Awake: The Life of Yogananda"(2014), about the life and teachings of the man who introduced yoga to the West, where she discusses the science behind yoga and meditation; and ii) “Quantum Convergence: The New Science of Consciousness” (2025), where she appears alongside Nobel Laureates Roger Penrose and the Dalai Lama and discusses how our current 20th century physics does not yet adequately describe life, living systems, and consciousness. 

Dr. Goel has also served as an expert on the U.S. Senate for the $1.5 billion National Nanotechnology Initiative; an Advisory Council to the U.S. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) on its Strategy for American Innovation; as Board Member on the Triennial Review Board of the National Academy of Sciences; as a Member of the Committee on Manufacturing Innovation of the National Academy of Engineering; and as an Advisory Council Member for CIFAR.

Dr. Goel holds a Ph.D. and M.A. in Physics from Harvard University, an MD from the Harvard-MIT Joint Division of Health Sciences and Technology (HST) at Harvard Medical School, and a BS in Physics with Honors & Distinction from Stanford University.  

You can sign up here:

https://www.withrealityinmind.com/anita-goel/

u/Responsible_Oil_9673 — 2 days ago

Rupert Spira & Bernardo Kastrup on nihilism, awakening and despair

I believe you'll truly enjoy the friendship between Bernardo and Rupert that grounds this probing dialogue, from the heights of awakening to the claustrophobic nihilism that can show up on this path.

They both share their experiences and understandings of sorrow and emptiness, starting with Bernardo's poem, Shattered Innocence, which he wrote in 2016:

"I grieve the loss of my innocence.

The mystery and possibilities that once were my world abandoned me,

Frivolousness and claustrophobia left in their stead."

But for Bernardo, there is something valuable in this experience of nihilism, a legitimate room in the palace of mind he can now conjure without fear.

Equally for Rupert, true awakening can extinguish the fear of human experience. Rather than a shield against emotion, grounding in being can give the confidence to confront deep sorrow and the sorry state of the world.

WHAT IS THE EXPERIENCE OF GOD?

But what is the true nature of reality? Does universal consciousness learn? Why does manifestation even happen?

Whilst we compared perspectives from Advaita, Kashmir Shaivism & Jung, Rupert always points to the immanent possibility of direct experience.

Moreover, he contends that ego dissolution is actually common but overlooked. It can happen in fleeting moments of satisfaction, the gap between thoughts, a moment of deep grief.

Spirituality is simply the deliberate cultivation of such moments, and we ended with a thought experiment from Rupert Spira to taste this insight.

For more, he offers free daily meditations on the Luminous App and many talks on his YouTube channel.

We also discussed:

How perception is illusion but the world is real

Understanding 'sudden onset nihilism'

Awakening to bliss & the depths of sorrow

Is the world a product of freedom or ignorance?

Growing an ego and outgrowing the ego

Here is a link to a free excerpt from the meeting, and the full recording for members:

https://www.withrealityinmind.com/rupert-spira/

Or as a one-off recording: https://dandelion.events/e/h2c54

u/Responsible_Oil_9673 — 29 days ago

The world is not illusion. Its Illumination: The nonduality of Kashmir Shaivism

What if the world is not illusion but illumination? Not a distraction from awakening but its delight?

If consciousness is inherently dynamic then every colour, sight and sound radiate its freedom. Testifies to its creativity. Exclaims its intelligence and power.

Right now you can look up and bear witness to the unfathomable complexity, its kaleidoscopic design. 

Every emotion and object, every success and sorrow, every blade of grass and breath that comes, and comes to pass.

In the nonduality of Kashmir Shaivism, even the ignorance of our own divinity is an expression of unlimited freedom. The freedom to forget who you are, and remember all over again.

Reality, then, calls for investigation and participation. Consideration and celebration.

So instead of freedom from suffering, the emphasis is on the freedom to fully engage with life.

Instead of becoming monks, many sages were devoted to beauty and nature, poetry and music, theatre and thought.

The tradition flowered in North India for hundreds of years until disrupted by invasions and forced conversions. But it continued to thrive in Nepal in a living lineage embodied in Sthaneshwar Timalsina.

Authorised as a Śaivācārya within the Nepali Sarvāmnāya tradition, Sthaneshwar is also Professor and Endowed Chair at Stony Brook University and founder of the global teaching platform Vimarsha.

He's joining Bernardo Kastrup to compare perspectives on three great questions this coming Tues 14th July

Is reality self-aware?
Does reality have purpose?
What does this mean for our lives?

You can register (for free) at this link:

https://dandelion.events/e/g71v4

Or join as a member of With Reality in Mind:

https://www.withrealityinmind.com/sthaneshwar-timalsina/

u/Responsible_Oil_9673 — 1 month ago

Overwhelming evidence for purpose, but is it instinctive or planned?

Imagine a desert in which there is just ONE grain of sand that represents the conditions needed to create life. Then imagine this selection happens correctly, many times in a row.

Bernardo Kastrup and Jude Currivan agree, there is overwhelming evidence that the universe has intention and purpose. Against incredible odds, physics appears exquisitely fine-tuned towards the emergence of galaxies, planets and life.

If the initial properties of the Big Bang, gravity, molecular clouds, water and countless other factors had been even slightly different, galaxies would never have formed, never mind life.

In fact, according to Sir Roger Penrose, the precision of the initial low-entropy of the universe is around one part in 10^(10^123). This number is so vast that writing out its zeros would take more digits than there are particles in the entire universe.

SPONTANEOUS OR DELIBERATE?

But is this intention instinctive intelligence, or considered deliberation?

Bernardo makes a distinction, and as a naturalist, leans towards purpose being spontaneous. Like the impulse an artist has to create that cannot be understood until the artwork is complete.

Jude however leans towards purpose as deliberate - a plan in which the future is not constrained, but is conceived.

They both engage with evidence from many areas of physics, and the debate was rigorous, respectful and revealing.

What are the chances you're even reading this? I look forward to hearing your thoughts!

ALSO DISCUSSED:

- Is the block universe evolving?
- The promise and peril of AI
- Can metaphysics transform society?
- Can time be real, yet the future determined?
- The hidden meaning behind it all
- Would aliens agree?

Full discussion available here:

https://www.withrealityinmind.com/instinct-or-plan/

Photo by Finding Dan | Dan Grinwis / Unsplash

reddit.com
u/Responsible_Oil_9673 — 2 months ago

Analytic Idealism on the birth of thought and of you

If Analytic Idealism is correct, your life is a thought in universal mind. Not a mysterious separate mind "out there", but rather the same consciousness looking through your eyes right now, and that of every other living creature.

If all of existence is one great movement of mind, your life is a special kind of thought - a pattern of thoughts in fact.

Swirling around themselves like whirlpools so internally integrated that they each form a unique perspective on all your other thoughts, represented on a dashboard of perception as planets and stars, your neighbour, your cat.

So what gives rise to creativity, to the universe, to a thought, and to you?

From the perspective of Analytic Idealism, these could all be variations on the same question.

Which makes introspection on how each new thought is born especially relevant.

You can watch your next thought being born right now. When I stop and look, i notice I know what the end of the internal monologue sentence will be before it ends - time works differently in that space.

We discussed this quite a bit last night with Bernardo Kastrup, (https://www.withrealityinmind.com/the-birth-of-thought/) and its been swirling round my mind ever since.

You'll notice no 'proof' is offered for this perspective in this post. This debate takes place endlessly elsewhere.

Instead, I'm curious how it lands with you as a thought experiment, not as a rigorous argument which there is space for in other threads...

u/Responsible_Oil_9673 — 3 months ago

Bernardo Kastrup on Birth, and why your life is not a test

If Bernardo Kastrup is correct, your life is a thought in universal mind. Not a mysterious separate mind "out there", but rather the same consciousness looking through your eyes right now, and that of every other living creature.

Whilst all of existence is one great movement of mind, your lives are special kinds of thought - patterns of thought in fact.

Swirling around themselves like whirlpools so internally integrated that they each form a unique perspective on all your other thoughts, represented on a dashboard of perception as planets and stars, your neighbour, your cat.

So how are new thought-patterns born? Where do their contents come from? And where do they go when we "die"?

In yesterday’s meeting Bernardo shares his perspective on birth, death, the ancestors and animal communication.

It was one of the most shamanic in tone whilst remaining tethered to the analytic rigour for which Bernardo is so admired.I look forward to hearing your reflections. With appreciation!

Amir

We discuss:

  • The innate seeds we bring to the world as priors.
  • How decisions are born from intuition then rationalised
  • A toddler re-enacts their traumatic birth
  • Ramanujan's uncanny mathematical intuition and what it reveals about the mind
  • Are we remembered by God after we die?
  • How Western prayer gets the relationship with God backwards
  • On raising children with a sense of mystery, not doctrine

The full meeting is here:

https://www.withrealityinmind.com/birth/

u/Responsible_Oil_9673 — 3 months ago

Seeing through the illusion of self (and remembering life before birth)

Recognising the illusion of separation is a central insight in many traditions. But Bernardo reserves the word ‘awakening’ for those who appear to have lost all identification with the body and only concerned for others. His example is the Vietnamese monk Thích Quảng Đức, who in 1963 set himself aflame in protest for the treatment of Buddhists, and sat calmly in meditation until he passed away.

Bernardo no longer seeks this state of mind. Instead, he honours the unthinkable price the universe has made to make his life possible, and the unique contribution his daimon aspires to make.

Nevertheless, he appreciates the reduced suffering that comes with maturity. His ability, like a violin, to be "played by life", to let decisions arise without the torment of personal responsibility, or having to understand everything and get everything "right".

As such, he recommends fighting the habit of physicalist thinking. Yes, there are neural correlates to conscious states. But this is only confusing if you are already hypnotised by physicalist assumptions. Physical stuff is only ever an appearance in consciousness. What it represents is an open question - and Bernardo contends the most parsimonious answer is that what it represents are yet more movements of mind. The universal mind which you are.

In this week's meeting we also discuss:

  • What Bernardo means by ‘I’ 
  • How to navigate the immense complexity of life
  • How weird life is (on both sides of the dashboard)
  • Remembering life before birth

https://www.withrealityinmind.com/seeing-through-the-illusion-of-self/

u/Responsible_Oil_9673 — 3 months ago