Mythos didn't create a new problem, it exposed one we already had. Is anyone else seeing this?
Been watching the Mythos coverage for weeks now, and I keep seeing the same take: "AI is going to flood us with vulnerabilities." But, I think that framing misses the point.
Pulled our backlog numbers last week. Across our environment, we're sitting at well over 100 findings per asset on average, some segments way higher. Do the math on that across thousands of assets and it gets ugly fast. And that's before Mythos.
The organizations that navigate this well won't be the ones reacting to Mythos. They'll be the ones who already built the operational layer that turns findings into closed exposure, normalized data across tools, clear ownership, integrated remediation workflows, verified closure.
Interested to hear if anyone else has sat down and stress-tested their VM setup against this kind of volume spike, or if we're all just hoping our current backlog math holds.