Image 1 — Chad Oulson was shot and killed after throwing popcorn at a man following a verbal altercation in a movie theatre. In 2022, the shooter was acquitted on the basis of Florida’s ‘Stand Your Ground’ law
Image 2 — Chad Oulson was shot and killed after throwing popcorn at a man following a verbal altercation in a movie theatre. In 2022, the shooter was acquitted on the basis of Florida’s ‘Stand Your Ground’ law
Image 3 — Chad Oulson was shot and killed after throwing popcorn at a man following a verbal altercation in a movie theatre. In 2022, the shooter was acquitted on the basis of Florida’s ‘Stand Your Ground’ law

Chad Oulson was shot and killed after throwing popcorn at a man following a verbal altercation in a movie theatre. In 2022, the shooter was acquitted on the basis of Florida’s ‘Stand Your Ground’ law

Just before 1:30pm on January 13, 2014, at a boutique cinema in Wesley Chapel, Florida, Gulf War veteran Chad Oulson got into an argument with a man sat nearby who had berated him for having his phone out and texting while trailers for upcoming movies were playing on screen.

Oulson became irate, telling the man that he was sending a message to a babysitter who was looking after he and his wife’s 22-month-old daughter whilst the couple had gone to catch a movie.

The man, retired police captain and SWAT commander Curtis J. Reeves, then left the theatre to raise the issue with management, but the verbal altercation quickly restarted when he returned to his seat. It was now Oulson’s turn to scold the other man, who he chided for a complaint that he viewed as a petty escalation in retaliation to his texting.

As the argument continued, Oulson then turned in his seat and threw a handful of popcorn at Reeves, striking him in the face. In response, Reeves immediately pulled out his handgun and fatally shot Oulson once in the chest. He was taken to hospital where he died later that day.

In the subsequent murder trial, Reeves’ legal team argued that he had shot Oulson in self-defence, basing their contention on Florida’s Stand Your Ground law, which provides that an individual has no duty to attempt to remove themselves from an apparently deadly scenario before reacting with lethal force.

Despite a judge initially rejecting the defence in March 2017, the defence successfully appealed the decision and Reeves’ fate was left in the hands of the jury. After a lengthy court process and numerous delays, the conclusion of the trial came 8 years after the initial incident when the jury acquitted Reeves on the basis that he had acted in self-defence.


There are a few notable aspects of witness testimony from the incident, much of which was excluded from the trial on the basis of hearsay:

Sources:

Image source: https://www.wtsp.com/article/news/crime/curtis-reeves-trial-day-4-testimony-audio-interview/67-b8a7d199-30e5-47cf-b74d-e424e42eb9b0

u/Sherbetlily — 10 days ago

In the early hours of August 13, 2018, in Frederick, Colorado, Chris Watts murdered his pregnant wife Shanann by strangulation, and their two children Bella and Celeste by smothering them.

He buried Shanann in a shallow grave near an oil-storage facility, and dumped his children's bodies into crude oil tanks. Chris initially maintained his innocence in his family's disappearance, but was arrested on August 15, after confessing in an interview with detectives to murdering Shanann. He later admitted to murdering his children.

u/Sherbetlily — 14 days ago

On July 12th 2024, Gavin Plumb was sentenced to life in prison for soliciting the kidnap, SA, and murder of TV presenter Holly Willoughby

Gavin Plumb, a 36-year-old security guard and father of two from Harlow, Essex, was arrested on October 4, 2023, under accusations of plotting to kidnap, SA, and murder British television presenter Holly Willoughby.

The police were tipped off to Plumb's plot through an online conversation he had had with a man based in the US, during which Plumb asked the man to come to the UK and help kill the TV presenter.

The pair had initially met through a Kik messenger group chat named ‘Abduct Lovers’, which had over 100 members discussing kidnap, SA, and murder fantasies. Over the course of some 300 private messages, Plumb stated that he knew when Willoughby does and does not have security, that she did not have CCTV at home, and what time she got up in the morning. In addition, Plumb outlined details of the planned kidnapping through a number of voice notes:

“Basically, we’re gonna hit it at night, less traffic on the road, etc., chloroform both of them [Willoughby & her husband]. That way they can both be easily restrained. Pick out outfits of hers that we like, and then obviously take her and the outfits with us, and then we’re gone.” (Source)

Most concerningly, Plumb also shared a video of the tools he had acquired over the past 18 months that they would use, including ropes, knives, metal cable ties, BDSM devices, and chloroform. When asked what he would do with Willoughby after he was “done” with her, Plumb said “slit her throat, clean her out and dispose of her”.

Unbeknownst to Plumb, the man with whom he had been sharing the intimate details of his insidious plot was, in fact, an undercover US law enforcement officer based in Minnesota, who quickly passed on the information to the UK authorities. He was arrested on October 4th, 2023 and was remanded in custody awaiting trial.

A forensic search of Plumb’s hard drive uncovered thousands upon thousands of images of Willoughby, including not only genuine images of her but also deepfake p*** images, digitally manipulated to impose Willoughby’s face on the body of various adult entertainers.

During the subsequent criminal trial in June 2024, Plumb’s previous convictions for attempted kidnap were heavily scrutinised: one in 2006 where he had told a woman that he had a gun and to get off with him at the next station; and one in 2008, when he had threatened two 16-year-old girls with a box cutter and attempted to bind their hands behind their backs.

On July 12th 2024, the jury found Plumb guilty on three counts: soliciting murder, encouraging or assisting the commission of the offence of kidnapping, and encouraging or assisting the commission of the offence of rape. He was handed a life-sentence and ordered to serve a minimum of 16 years in prison.

Sources

u/Sherbetlily — 14 days ago

Chad Oulson was shot and killed after throwing popcorn at a man following a verbal altercation in a movie theatre. In 2022, the shooter was acquitted on the basis of Florida’s ‘Stand Your Ground’ law

Just before 1:30pm on January 13, 2014, at a boutique cinema in Wesley Chapel, Florida, Gulf War veteran Chad Oulson got into an argument with a man sat nearby who had berated him for having his phone out and texting while trailers for upcoming movies were playing on screen.

Oulson became irate, telling the man that he was sending a message to a babysitter who was looking after he and his wife’s 22-month-old daughter whilst the couple had gone to catch a movie.

The man, retired police captain and SWAT commander Curtis J. Reeves, then left the theatre to raise the issue with management, but the verbal altercation quickly restarted when he returned to his seat. It was now Oulson’s turn to scold the other man, who he chided for a complaint that he viewed as a petty escalation in retaliation to his texting.

As the argument continued, Oulson then turned in his seat and threw a handful of popcorn at Reeves, striking him in the face. In response, Reeves immediately pulled out his handgun and fatally shot Oulson once in the chest. He was taken to hospital where he died later that day.

In the subsequent murder trial, Reeves’ legal team argued that he had shot Oulson in self-defence, basing their contention on Florida’s Stand Your Ground law, which provides that an individual has no duty to attempt to remove themselves from an apparently deadly scenario before reacting with lethal force.

Despite a judge initially rejecting the defence in March 2017, the defence successfully appealed the decision and Reeves’ fate was left in the hands of the jury. After a lengthy court process and numerous delays, the conclusion of the trial came 8 years after the initial incident when the jury acquitted Reeves on the basis that he had acted in self-defence.


There are a few notable aspects of witness testimony from the incident, much of which was excluded from the trial on the basis of hearsay:

Sources:

Image source: https://www.wtsp.com/article/news/crime/curtis-reeves-trial-day-4-testimony-audio-interview/67-b8a7d199-30e5-47cf-b74d-e424e42eb9b0

u/Sherbetlily — 15 days ago