A two paragraph analysis on the whole genderslop discourse on the concept of "men discovering ideas that women thought of when they were children", because I think its more interesting than the standard battle of the sexes
What I'm having trouble understanding is that I've definitely read or heard about things said by philosophers that made me go "that was something I was spitballing in my head when I was a kid", and I'm not a woman. I was under the impression that this isn't a particularly unique or exclusively female experience. Anyone who has taken an interest in philosophy ought to have come across this phenomenon multiple times. The response to the women who say this is often "no you didn't, you're a liar", which is bewildering to me because "so did I, but I can accurately and succinctly verbalize these concepts now that I am a fully developed adult" is right there, readily available for anyone to say. Its not disparaging, but still manages to contest the notion that you're somehow justified in being condescending just because you weren't uncurious in your formative years.
It should also be noted that we often take for granted that many of these concepts have existed long before we were born and were already interwoven into the ideological zeitgeist, so it would make sense that these are things that you would already be thinking about at a young age. For example, if as an adult you read about a guy named isaac newton who came up with gravitational theory, it would come off as conceited to proudly declare that you already thought of that when you were a child, because of course you did. That's sort of the basic cable of our understanding of reality in the 21st century, so having a hypothesis of it before you ever read about it wouldn't exactly make you precocious. I'm only posting this here because I suspect that my mentation has a blind spot. I'd like to know if there's something I'm missing.