“This first person character is an unreliable narrator”
Every time I see someone call Percy Jackson and Katniss Everdeen an “unreliable narrator”, I *immediately* get irritated- and yes those are the examples I’m using because this is what I see the most often
Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t an unreliable narrator a character/voice in a story that either outright lies, lies by omission, and or paints the narrative in a dishonest way to *intentionally* mislead the reader ?
I keep seeing people call these first person characters “unreliable” simply for being biased or not knowing the whole truth- but a character being biased doesn’t make that character unreliable, it just means they’re not objective/omniscient, which is practically EVERY first person character, isn’t it ??
It really fucking confounds me, a character being insecure and us reading them having those thoughts doesn’t make them “unreliable” because they’re “not telling the truth”, they’re not trying to mislead the audience, they just have low self esteem- “Percy Jackson is an unreliable narrator because he thinks he’s a loser when he’s actually not”- that’s not what an unreliable narrator is
It’s even more aggravating in the case of Katniss when the whole og trilogy has a constant theme of propaganda- and clearly shows that every character, INCLUDING KATNISS, has their biases BECAUSE of the environment they live in -no Katniss isn’t “unreliable” because she’s “a better archer than she says she is” or because “she doesn’t realize she’s in love with Peeta”- that’s not what an unreliable narrator is , these characters have their biases/perspectives BECAUSE of who they are/what they’re going through, not because they’re trying to mislead the audience
It makes me confused as to what people mean/what people want- Is an unreliable narrator really just a character that “doesn’t tell the truth unequivocally no matter what” to some people ? Do people want characters that are more “objective”? Why ? That would make books significantly less fun to read, right ?? 😭
I dunno, I feel like in general I’m seeing people misuse literary terms on social media all the fucking time and it’s genuinely starting to irk me 💀 like if you aren’t sure what it means just look it up ? I’m getting really tired of people not understanding what words mean 😭
EDIT: For some reason, I literally cannot see the comments, idk why and it’s a shame but 🤷🏾♀️ I mean shit, idk what to do about it
anyways, I see (some) of what people are saying about intent, so I double checked my definitions, and it’s seems like more of a sliding scale then an exact descriptor- and atp I might be being pedantic, but the reason why I say they’re “biased” but not “unreliable” -despite the fact that being non objective by definition can make a character unreliable, is because I feel like calling any character that has any amount of bias or doesn’t know the whole truth (yet- or ever) -makes practically every first person character an unreliable narrator ?
Because then it would seem like the only way to have a “truly reliable narrator”, is if they knew everything right off the bat, were right all the time, and were completely non objective, and I really can’t think of any characters like that ? I can’t even think of a way for a character to be a “truly reliable narrator” and still have an arc, dramatic irony, etc etc.- so maybe they don’t have to be aware of the fact that they’re not as “true” as they believe themselves to be-
but I still feel like calling characters having moments of insecurity, or being dense-examples of them being unreliable narrators is a stretch, because if that’s all it takes, then any character with any minor flaw is unreliable, and I just don’t believe that to be the case 🤷🏾♀️
Edit 2: nvm I can see the comments now ! Don’t know wtf happened but they’re back lmao