I started seeing negligence as a literal chain
When I studied for the bar I started thinking about negligence as a literal chain. Duty, breach, causation, damages. Each link connected to the next, each one carrying weight. Seeing it this way made the doctrine feel like something I could move through as a chain reaction, instead of a set of separate hurdles.
Damages is the link that hits when you are already carrying everything else. By the time you reach it, you are tired, and the whole story feels heavier.
I made a short song about the damages chain, the moment where the link breaks and everything shifts. It is part of the larger chain I use to keep negligence connected. It works like a memory palace, a path you can follow so the doctrine feels like a story and not just a list.
Sharing in case someone else is deep in Torts and needs a way to feel damages as much as understand it. Hope this helps!