u/SpellZealousideal168

​

Hey Codex community!

I'm a developer using AI to build real software, not just experiment with prompts.

The biggest problem right now is running into usage limits while I'm working.

That's why I'm looking for someone with an unused official ChatGPT Desktop referral invitation.

If your offer rewards both eligible participants, that's even better!

I'd love to hear from anyone who has spare 500 or 1,000-credit invites.

Comment here or send me a DM.

Every legitimate offer is appreciated!

Does anyone have a spare they could send me? Happy to return the favor if I get one to share later 🙏

​

One change I've been experimenting with when using AI for programming is separating the planning stage from the coding stage.

Instead of:

"Build this application for me."

I prefer something like:

"Analyze this project requirement. Break it into components, identify potential edge cases, and propose an implementation plan. Don't write the code yet."

Then I review the plan before asking for the implementation.

This makes it easier to catch misunderstandings before they turn into hundreds of lines of generated code.

I also like asking:

"Before giving me the final code, list the assumptions you're making."

AI-generated code can be useful, but blindly accepting it can create problems that are harder to find later.

How do you use AI when programming?

​

One thing I've learned from using AI assistants is that the first answer doesn't always need to be the final answer.

Instead of immediately asking for a completely new response, I often ask ChatGPT to critique its own answer.

For example:

"Review your previous answer. Identify anything that is unclear, unsupported, unnecessarily complicated, or potentially incorrect. Then provide an improved version."

Another useful variation is:

"What assumptions did you make when answering this question?"

This can reveal missing context that I didn't realize I had left out.

Obviously, this doesn't guarantee that the answer is correct. The output still needs to be checked when accuracy matters.

Do you usually refine your prompts after the first response, or start over with a new prompt?

​

With the rapid evolution of AI assistants and tools integrated into code editors, the development workflow has changed dramatically.

On one hand, we can structure entire frontend and backend projects in minutes. On the other hand, the generated code still requires careful review and testing.

What has your experience been like?

Do you fully trust AI-generated code, or do you mainly use it as a starting point or first draft?

Share your thoughts and experiences below!

​

Many of us use ChatGPT in a very simple way, but the way we structure our prompts can completely change the results.

A good prompt structure usually includes:

• Role/Context: Tell ChatGPT who it should act as (e.g., "Act as a senior Python developer").

• Clear Task: Define exactly what you want it to do.

• Constraints/Format: Specify limitations or the desired format (e.g., "Summarize in bullet points" or "Avoid complex technical terms").

What prompt techniques do you use most in your daily life?

Let's exchange ideas in the comments!