u/SpinachNo2517

This will not be the slam dunk win in your favor that you think it will be. You will not win millions for defamation of slander. There is too much evidence stacked against you.

While it is true that some individuals may have taken their actions too far, that does not erase the significant amount of evidence that exists regarding your own conduct. Based on that evidence, this is far from the clear-cut case you appear to believe it is.

The evidence depicts a consistent pattern of behavior that raises serious concerns regarding honesty, judgment, and parenting. Solid documentation that indicates that you spent extensive periods of time broadcasting live on social media—often for 12 to 24 hours per day, multiple times each week. During these broadcasts, your attention was frequently focused on entertainment and online engagement rather than your parental responsibilities.

During those livestreams, you devoted your attention to activities such as diamond art, clam slams, licking toilets, eating feces, dancing, singing, and other entertainment, rather than focusing on your child’s needs.

A court or government agency may consider whether the amount of time devoted to livestreaming negatively affected your child’s well-being. Areas that may be evaluated include supervision, hygiene, emotional well-being, cognitive and physical development, education, and whether your child’s basic needs were consistently met.

The totality of the evidence may also provide context as to why members of the public became concerned and attempted to encourage you to end the livestreams and prioritize your child’s care. While some individuals may have responded inappropriately or taken matters too far, that does not necessarily negate the underlying concerns reflected in the available evidence.

Ultimately, the judge will evaluate all of the evidence presented by both sides and determine what weight, if any, should be given to each piece of evidence.

The only one who deserves a RO is C against his parents for the rest of this life.

If during the continuance the lawyer reaches out to providers she has used in her FAKE medical documents saga and in July the lawyer calls a witness up to the stand and the lawyer turns to G and asks her “Do you recognize this man?” And when G says “No”…the lawyer replies “Well that is interesting seeing that you had submitted medial documents with his name and signature” I pray something like happens in July! 😁 She needs to be called out on EVERYTHING once and for all!!!