u/StrelokIsABitch

Was tweaking with this technologies in diferent games, checking 2 examples; from 130 to 260, and from 200 to 260 (fps capped) on my 260hz display.

Perhaps its placebo, but the image clarity with less artifact was the one with the higher base fps, even if the fps is capped.

Im sure someone knows better about this technologies, if its the case please explain to me if the artifacts are the same no matter the base fps, or im just wasting performance etc.

Inexeperienced with it; in somes games ive tried L and M and the shimmering was too much, but in others I tried K and the ghosting is really noticeable. What would you recommend?

https://preview.redd.it/sdrqyf7fsjyg1.png?width=779&format=png&auto=webp&s=b677f8b4ea328f5fe77955cca4369fec590aa551

Ive seen that using recommended option only uses preset A; Ive also tested manually preset B for comparison and I may be blind, but I dont see any improvement in visual image between A and B.

I recently bought a new rig (from GTX 1650 to 5070TI), so im new with the new technologies the RTX gives. Frame gen in particular is so good in particular I use It on x4 in pretty much all games where I can enable It since I have a high refresh rate display, but latency is something I cant get myself to understand;

I get between 30-50 ms latency, But I dont feel any diference regarding input lag or games having a "floaty" feeling, but I dont know if im shooting myself in the foot with a high latency in games where I need to have snappier inputs.