![Saw this on Rednote, WTF [D]](https://preview.redd.it/t7wxguxqvzth1.png?width=140&height=140&crop=1:1,smart&auto=webp&s=225c600096f3dff46b95069c394b14a560bdead4)
Saw this on Rednote, WTF [D]
Guess we have a dataset for sycophancy and AI content detection
![Saw this on Rednote, WTF [D]](https://preview.redd.it/t7wxguxqvzth1.png?width=140&height=140&crop=1:1,smart&auto=webp&s=225c600096f3dff46b95069c394b14a560bdead4)
Guess we have a dataset for sycophancy and AI content detection
Wyhy this keeps happening to iclr?
The ICLR review policy says if your name appears on 3 or more papers, you will need to serve as a reviewer, and it did not say anything about qualifications. I only have 2 so this doesn't apply to me, but I am not sure if I understand it correctly and thus have some concerns. So say if Alex, a new student, was 4th author on 3 papers in their lab, does it mean he needs to review even if he is not qualified?
This round seems to be very small, but still creating this thread for discussion.
The AC email says the rebuttal is between 28 to 4th. The June 4th on website is the deadline. So I created this post for the discussion. I know it's a MM conference and less about ML but I think many people here are still submitting there.
I want to make a position track decision thread because it is a niche and small track I think discussions will be submerged in the main track discussion track